Source author record

Li-Sheng Zhang

Li-Sheng Zhang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Enforcing continuous symmetries in physics-informed neural network for solving forward and inverse problems of partial differential equations

As a typical application of deep learning, physics-informed neural network (PINN) {has been} successfully used to find numerical solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs), but how to improve the limited accuracy is still a great challenge for PINN. In this work, we introduce a new method, symmetry-enhanced physics informed neural network (SPINN) where the invariant surface conditions induced by the Lie symmetries or non-classical symmetries of PDEs are embedded into the loss function in PINN, to improve the accuracy of PINN for solving the forward and inverse problems of PDEs. We test the effectiveness of SPINN for the forward problem via two groups of ten independent numerical experiments using different numbers of collocation points and neurons for the heat equation, Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation and potential Burgers {equations} respectively, and for the inverse problem by considering different layers and neurons as well as different training points for the Burgers equation in potential form. The numerical results show that SPINN performs better than PINN with fewer training points and simpler architecture of neural network. Furthermore, we discuss the computational overhead of SPINN in terms of the relative computational cost to PINN and show that the training time of SPINN has no obvious increases, even less than PINN for certain cases.