Source author record

Levent Tuncel

Levent Tuncel appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.OC Data Structures and Algorithms Discrete Mathematics math.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2015arXiv

Approximation Ratio of LD Algorithm for Multi-Processor Scheduling and the Coffman-Sethi Conjecture

Coffman and Sethi proposed a heuristic algorithm, called LD, for multi-processor scheduling, to minimize makespan over flowtime-optimal schedules. LD algorithm is a natural extension of a very well-known list scheduling algorithm, Longest Processing Time (LPT) list scheduling, to our bicriteria scheduling problem. Moreover, in 1976, Coffman and Sethi conjectured that LD algorithm has precisely the following worst-case performance bound: $\frac{5}{4} - \frac{3}{4(4m-1)}$, where m is the number of machines. In this paper, utilizing some recent work by the authors and Huang, from 2013, which exposed some very strong combinatorial properties of various presumed minimal counterexamples to the conjecture, we provide a proof of this conjecture. The problem and the LD algorithm have connections to other fundamental problems (such as the assembly line-balancing problem) and to other algorithms.

preprint2014arXiv

A Perturbed Sums of Squares Theorem for Polynomial Optimization and its Applications

We consider a property of positive polynomials on a compact set with a small perturbation. When applied to a Polynomial Optimization Problem (POP), the property implies that the optimal value of the corresponding SemiDefinite Programming (SDP) relaxation with sufficiently large relaxation order is bounded from below by $(f^\ast - ε)$ and from above by $f^\ast + ε(n+1)$, where $f^\ast$ is the optimal value of the POP. We propose new SDP relaxations for POP based on modifications of existing sums-of-squares representation theorems. An advantage of our SDP relaxations is that in many cases they are of considerably smaller dimension than those originally proposed by Lasserre. We present some applications and the results of our computational experiments.

preprint2014arXiv

Local Superlinear Convergence of Polynomial-Time Interior-Point Methods for Hyperbolic Cone Optimization Problems

In this paper, we establish the local superlinear convergence property of some polynomial-time interior-point methods for an important family of conic optimization problems. The main structural property used in our analysis is the logarithmic homogeneity of self-concordant barrier function, which must have {\em negative curvature}. We propose a new path-following predictor-corrector scheme, which work only in the dual space. It is based on an easily computable gradient proximity measure, which ensures an automatic transformation of the global linear rate of convergence to the local superlinear one under some mild assumptions. Our step-size procedure for the predictor step is related to the maximum step size maintaining feasibility. As the optimal solution set is approached, our algorithm automatically tightens the neighborhood of the central path proportionally to the current duality gap.

preprint2013arXiv

Worst-Case Performance Analysis of Some Approximation Algorithms for Minimizing Makespan and Flow-Time

In 1976, Coffman and Sethi conjectured that a natural extension of LPT list scheduling to the bicriteria scheduling problem of minimizing makespan over flowtime optimal schedules, called LD algorithm, has a simple worst-case performance bound: (5m-2)/(4m-1), where m is the number of machines. We study structure of potential minimal counterexamples to this conjecture and prove that the conjecture holds for the cases (i) n > 5m, (ii) m = 2, (iii) m = 3, and (iv) m greater than or equal to 4, n less than or equal to 3m, where n is the number of jobs. We further conclude that to verify the conjecture, it suffices to analyze the following case: for every m greater than or equal to 4, n is either equal to 4m or 5m.