BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lee Dicker

Lee Dicker contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Dense Signals, Linear Estimators, and Out-of-Sample Prediction for High-Dimensional Linear Models

Motivated by questions about dense (non-sparse) signals in high-dimensional data analysis, we study the unconditional out-of-sample prediction error (predictive risk) associated with three popular linear estimators for high-dimensional linear models: ridge regression estimators, scalar multiples of the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator (referred to as James-Stein shrinkage estimators), and marginal regression estimators. The results in this paper require no assumptions about sparsity and imply: (i) if prior information about the population predictor covariance is available, then the ridge estimator outperforms the OLS, James-Stein, and marginal estimators; (ii) if little is known about the population predictor covariance, then the James-Stein estimator may be an effective alternative to the ridge estimator; and (iii) the marginal estimator has serious deficiencies for out-of-sample prediction. Both finite sample and asymptotic properties of the estimators are studied in this paper. Though various asymptotic regimes are considered, we focus on the setting where the number of predictors is roughly proportional to the number of observations. Ultimately, the results presented here provide new and detailed practical guidance regarding several well-known non-sparse methods for high-dimensional linear models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Optimal Estimation and Prediction for Dense Signals in High-Dimensional Linear Models

Estimation and prediction problems for dense signals are often framed in terms of minimax problems over highly symmetric parameter spaces. In this paper, we study minimax problems over l2-balls for high-dimensional linear models with Gaussian predictors. We obtain sharp asymptotics for the minimax risk that are applicable in any asymptotic setting where the number of predictors diverges and prove that ridge regression is asymptotically minimax. Adaptive asymptotic minimax ridge estimators are also identified. Orthogonal invariance is heavily exploited throughout the paper and, beyond serving as a technical tool, provides additional insight into the problems considered here. Most of our results follow from an apparently novel analysis of an equivalent non-Gaussian sequence model with orthogonally invariant errors. As with many dense estimation and prediction problems, the minimax risk studied here has rate d/n, where d is the number of predictors and n is the number of observations; however, when d is roughly proportional to n the minimax risk is influenced by the spectral distribution of the predictors and is notably different from the linear minimax risk for the Gaussian sequence model (Pinsker, 1980) that often appears in other dense estimation and prediction problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Parallelism, Uniqueness, and Large-Sample Asymptotics for the Dantzig Selector

The Dantzig selector (Candes and Tao, 2007) is a popular l1-regularization method for variable selection and estimation in linear regression. We present a very weak geometric condition on the observed predictors which is related to parallelism and, when satisfied, ensures the uniqueness of Dantzig selector estimators. The condition holds with probability 1, if the predictors are drawn from a continuous distribution. We discuss the necessity of this condition for uniqueness and also provide a closely related condition which ensures uniqueness of lasso estimators (Tibshirani, 1996). Large sample asymptotics for the Dantzig selector, i.e. almost sure convergence and the asymptotic distribution, follow directly from our uniqueness results and a continuity argument. The limiting distribution of the Dantzig selector is generally non-normal. Though our asymptotic results require that the number of predictors is fixed (similar to (Knight and Fu, 2000)), our uniqueness results are valid for an arbitrary number of predictors and observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

An Alternative Prior Process for Nonparametric Bayesian Clustering

Prior distributions play a crucial role in Bayesian approaches to clustering. Two commonly-used prior distributions are the Dirichlet and Pitman-Yor processes. In this paper, we investigate the predictive probabilities that underlie these processes, and the implicit "rich-get-richer" characteristic of the resulting partitions. We explore an alternative prior for nonparametric Bayesian clustering -- the uniform process -- for applications where the "rich-get-richer" property is undesirable. We also explore the cost of this process: partitions are no longer exchangeable with respect to the ordering of variables. We present new asymptotic and simulation-based results for the clustering characteristics of the uniform process and compare these with known results for the Dirichlet and Pitman-Yor processes. We compare performance on a real document clustering task, demonstrating the practical advantage of the uniform process despite its lack of exchangeability over orderings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access