BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Laura B. Balzer

Laura B. Balzer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMachine LearningMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Evaluating shifts in mobility and COVID-19 case rates in U.S. counties: A demonstration of modified treatment policies for causal inference with continuous exposures

Previous research has shown mixed evidence on the associations between mobility data and COVID-19 case rates, analysis of which is complicated by differences between places on factors influencing both behavior and health outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the county-level impact of shifting the distribution of mobility on the growth in COVID-19 case rates from June 1 - November 14, 2020. We utilized a modified treatment policy (MTP) approach, which considers the impact of shifting an exposure away from its observed value. The MTP approach facilitates studying the effects of continuous exposures while minimizing parametric modeling assumptions. Ten mobility indices were selected to capture several aspects of behavior expected to influence and be influenced by COVID-19 case rates. The outcome was defined as the number of new cases per 100,000 residents two weeks ahead of each mobility measure. Primary analyses used targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) with a Super Learner ensemble of machine learning algorithms, considering over 20 potential confounders capturing counties' recent case rates as well as social, economic, health, and demographic variables. For comparison, we also implemented unadjusted analyses. For most weeks considered, unadjusted analyses suggested strong associations between mobility indices and subsequent growth in case rates. However, after confounder adjustment, none of the indices showed consistent associations after hypothetical shifts to reduce mobility. While identifiability concerns limit our ability to make causal claims in this analysis, MTPs are a powerful and underutilized tool for studying the effects of continuous exposures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Evaluating the Impact of State-Level Public Masking Mandates on New COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in the United States: A Demonstration of the Causal Roadmap

At a national-level, we sought to investigate the effect of public masking mandates on COVID-19 in Fall 2020. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate how the relative growth of COVID-19 cases and deaths would have differed if all states had issued a mandate to mask in public by September 1, 2020 versus if all states had delayed issuing such a mandate. To do so, we applied the Causal Roadmap, a formal framework for causal and statistical inference. The outcome was defined as the state-specific relative increase in cumulative cases and in cumulative deaths {21, 30, 45, 60}-days after September 1. Despite the natural experiment in state-level masking policies, the causal effect of interest was not identifiable. Nonetheless, we specified the target statistical parameter as the adjusted rate ratio (aRR): the expected outcome with early implementation divided by the expected outcome with delayed implementation, after adjusting for state-level confounders. To minimize strong estimation assumptions, primary analyses used targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) with Super Learner. After 60-days and at a national-level, early implementation was associated 9% reduction in new COVID-19 cases (aRR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.88-0.95) and a 16% reduction in new COVID-19 deaths (aRR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.76-0.93). Although lack of identifiability prohibited causal interpretations, application of the Causal Roadmap facilitated estimation and inference of statistical associations, providing timely answers to pressing questions in the COVID-19 response.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Two-Stage TMLE to Reduce Bias and Improve Efficiency in Cluster Randomized Trials

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals (e.g., clinics or communities) and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. While offering many advantages, this experimental design introduces challenges that are only partially addressed by existing analytic approaches. First, outcomes are often missing for some individuals within clusters. Failing to appropriately adjust for differential outcome measurement can result in biased estimates and inference. Second, CRTs often randomize limited numbers of clusters, resulting in chance imbalances on baseline outcome predictors between arms. Failing to adaptively adjust for these imbalances and other predictive covariates can result in efficiency losses. To address these methodological gaps, we propose and evaluate a novel two-stage targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) to adjust for baseline covariates in a manner that optimizes precision, after controlling for baseline and post-baseline causes of missing outcomes. Finite sample simulations illustrate that our approach can nearly eliminate bias due to differential outcome measurement, while existing CRT estimators yield misleading results and inferences. Application to real data from the SEARCH community randomized trial demonstrates the gains in efficiency afforded through adaptive adjustment for baseline covariates, after controlling for missingness on individual-level outcomes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access