BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Lance Fortnow

Lance Fortnow appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityComputer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and Algorithmsmath.LOmath.PRmath.STStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Multi-outcome and Multidimensional Market Scoring Rules

Hanson's market scoring rules allow us to design a prediction market that still gives useful information even if we have an illiquid market with a limited number of budget-constrained agents. Each agent can "move" the current price of a market towards their prediction. While this movement still occurs in multi-outcome or multidimensional markets we show that no market-scoring rule, under reasonable conditions, always moves the price directly towards beliefs of the agents. We present a modified version of a market scoring rule for budget-limited traders, and show that it does have the property that, from any starting position, optimal trade by a budget-limited trader will result in the market being moved towards the trader's true belief. This mechanism also retains several attractive strategic properties of the market scoring rule.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Complexity Classes of Equivalence Problems Revisited

To determine if two lists of numbers are the same set, we sort both lists and see if we get the same result. The sorted list is a canonical form for the equivalence relation of set equality. Other canonical forms arise in graph isomorphism algorithms, and the equality of permutation groups given by generators. To determine if two graphs are cospectral (have the same eigenvalues), however, we compute their characteristic polynomials and see if they are the same; the characteristic polynomial is a complete invariant for the equivalence relation of cospectrality. This is weaker than a canonical form, and it is not known whether a polynomial-time canonical form for cospectrality exists. Note that it is a priori possible for an equivalence relation to be decidable in polynomial time without either a complete invariant or canonical form. Blass and Gurevich (SIAM J. Comput., 1984) ask whether these conditions on equivalence relations -- having an FP canonical form, having an FP complete invariant, and simply being in P -- are in fact different. They showed that this question requires non-relativizing techniques to resolve. Here we extend their results, and give new connections to probabilistic and quantum computation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Repeated Matching Pennies with Limited Randomness

We consider a repeated Matching Pennies game in which players have limited access to randomness. Playing the (unique) Nash equilibrium in this n-stage game requires n random bits. Can there be Nash equilibria that use less than n random coins? Our main results are as follows: We give a full characterization of approximate equilibria, showing that, for any e in [0, 1], the game has a e-Nash equilibrium if and only if both players have (1 - e)n random coins. When players are bound to run in polynomial time, Nash equilibria can exist if and only if one-way functions exist. It is possible to trade-off randomness for running time. In particular, under reasonable assumptions, if we give one player only O(log n) random coins but allow him to run in arbitrary polynomial time and we restrict his opponent to run in time n^k, for some fixed k, then we can sustain an Nash equilibrium. When the game is played for an infinite amount of rounds with time discounted utilities, under reasonable assumptions, we can reduce the amount of randomness required to achieve a e-Nash equilibrium to n, where n is the number of random coins necessary to achieve an approximate Nash equilibrium in the general case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Inseparability and Strong Hypotheses for Disjoint NP Pairs

This paper investigates the existence of inseparable disjoint pairs of NP languages and related strong hypotheses in computational complexity. Our main theorem says that, if NP does not have measure 0 in EXP, then there exist disjoint pairs of NP languages that are P-inseparable, in fact TIME(2^(n^k))-inseparable. We also relate these conditions to strong hypotheses concerning randomness and genericity of disjoint pairs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Robust Simulations and Significant Separations

We define and study a new notion of "robust simulations" between complexity classes which is intermediate between the traditional notions of infinitely-often and almost-everywhere, as well as a corresponding notion of "significant separations". A language L has a robust simulation in a complexity class C if there is a language in C which agrees with L on arbitrarily large polynomial stretches of input lengths. There is a significant separation of L from C if there is no robust simulation of L in C. The new notion of simulation is a cleaner and more natural notion of simulation than the infinitely-often notion. We show that various implications in complexity theory such as the collapse of PH if NP = P and the Karp-Lipton theorem have analogues for robust simulations. We then use these results to prove that most known separations in complexity theory, such as hierarchy theorems, fixed polynomial circuit lower bounds, time-space tradeoffs, and the theorems of Allender and Williams, can be strengthened to significant separations, though in each case, an almost everywhere separation is unknown. Proving our results requires several new ideas, including a completely different proof of the hierarchy theorem for non-deterministic polynomial time than the ones previously known.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions

Given samples from two distributions over an $n$-element set, we wish to test whether these distributions are statistically close. We present an algorithm which uses sublinear in $n$, specifically, $O(n^{2/3}ε^{-8/3}\log n)$, independent samples from each distribution, runs in time linear in the sample size, makes no assumptions about the structure of the distributions, and distinguishes the cases when the distance between the distributions is small (less than $\max\{ε^{4/3}n^{-1/3}/32, εn^{-1/2}/4\}$) or large (more than $ε$) in $\ell_1$ distance. This result can be compared to the lower bound of $Ω(n^{2/3}ε^{-2/3})$ for this problem given by Valiant. Our algorithm has applications to the problem of testing whether a given Markov process is rapidly mixing. We present sublinear for several variants of this problem as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1998arXiv

Separating complexity classes using autoreducibility

A set is autoreducible if it can be reduced to itself by a Turing machine that does not ask its own input to the oracle. We use autoreducibility to separate the polynomial-time hierarchy from polynomial space by showing that all Turing-complete sets for certain levels of the exponential-time hierarchy are autoreducible but there exists some Turing-complete set for doubly exponential space that is not. Although we already knew how to separate these classes using diagonalization, our proofs separate classes solely by showing they have different structural properties, thus applying Post's Program to complexity theory. We feel such techniques may prove unknown separations in the future. In particular, if we could settle the question as to whether all Turing-complete sets for doubly exponential time are autoreducible, we would separate either polynomial time from polynomial space, and nondeterministic logarithmic space from nondeterministic polynomial time, or else the polynomial-time hierarchy from exponential time. We also look at the autoreducibility of complete sets under nonadaptive, bounded query, probabilistic and nonuniform reductions. We show how settling some of these autoreducibility questions will also read to new complexity class separations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access