BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lalith Suresh

Lalith Suresh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
DatabasesDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingNetworking and Internet ArchitectureSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Transactions Make Debugging Easy

We propose TROD, a novel transaction-oriented framework for debugging modern distributed web applications and online services. Our critical insight is that if applications store all state in databases and only access state transactionally, TROD can use lightweight always-on tracing to track the history of application state changes and data provenance, and then leverage the captured traces and transaction logs to faithfully replay or even test modified code retroactively on any past event. We demonstrate how TROD can simplify programming and debugging in production applications, list several research challenges and directions, and encourage the database and systems communities to drastically rethink the synergy between the way people develop and debug applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

PL2: Towards Predictable Low Latency in Rack-Scale Networks

High performance rack-scale offerings package disaggregated pools of compute, memory and storage hardware in a single rack to run diverse workloads with varying requirements, including applications that need low and predictable latency. The intra-rack network is typically high speed Ethernet, which can suffer from congestion leading to packet drops and may not satisfy the stringent tail latency requirements for some workloads (including remote memory/storage accesses). In this paper, we design a Predictable Low Latency(PL2) network architecture for rack-scale systems with Ethernet as interconnecting fabric. PL2 leverages programmable Ethernet switches to carefully schedule packets such that they incur no loss with NIC and switch queues maintained at small, near-zero levels. In our 100 Gbps rack-prototype, PL2 keeps 99th-percentile memcached RPC latencies under 60us even when the RPCs compete with extreme offered-loads of 400%, without losing traffic. Network transfers for a machine learning training task complete 30% faster than a receiver-driven scheme implementation modeled after Homa (222ms vs 321ms 99%ile latency per iteration).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access