Researcher profile

Kwangjun Ahn

Kwangjun Ahn contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Agnostic Learnability of Halfspaces via Logistic Loss

We investigate approximation guarantees provided by logistic regression for the fundamental problem of agnostic learning of homogeneous halfspaces. Previously, for a certain broad class of "well-behaved" distributions on the examples, Diakonikolas et al. (2020) proved an $\tildeΩ(\textrm{OPT})$ lower bound, while Frei et al. (2021) proved an $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\textrm{OPT}})$ upper bound, where $\textrm{OPT}$ denotes the best zero-one/misclassification risk of a homogeneous halfspace. In this paper, we close this gap by constructing a well-behaved distribution such that the global minimizer of the logistic risk over this distribution only achieves $Ω(\sqrt{\textrm{OPT}})$ misclassification risk, matching the upper bound in (Frei et al., 2021). On the other hand, we also show that if we impose a radial-Lipschitzness condition in addition to well-behaved-ness on the distribution, logistic regression on a ball of bounded radius reaches $\tilde{O}(\textrm{OPT})$ misclassification risk. Our techniques also show for any well-behaved distribution, regardless of radial Lipschitzness, we can overcome the $Ω(\sqrt{\textrm{OPT}})$ lower bound for logistic loss simply at the cost of one additional convex optimization step involving the hinge loss and attain $\tilde{O}(\textrm{OPT})$ misclassification risk. This two-step convex optimization algorithm is simpler than previous methods obtaining this guarantee, all of which require solving $O(\log(1/\textrm{OPT}))$ minimization problems.

preprint2022arXiv

Understanding Nesterov's Acceleration via Proximal Point Method

The proximal point method (PPM) is a fundamental method in optimization that is often used as a building block for designing optimization algorithms. In this work, we use the PPM method to provide conceptually simple derivations along with convergence analyses of different versions of Nesterov's accelerated gradient method (AGM). The key observation is that AGM is a simple approximation of PPM, which results in an elementary derivation of the update equations and stepsizes of AGM. This view also leads to a transparent and conceptually simple analysis of AGM's convergence by using the analysis of PPM. The derivations also naturally extend to the strongly convex case. Ultimately, the results presented in this paper are of both didactic and conceptual value; they unify and explain existing variants of AGM while motivating other accelerated methods for practically relevant settings.

preprint2022arXiv

Understanding the unstable convergence of gradient descent

Most existing analyses of (stochastic) gradient descent rely on the condition that for $L$-smooth costs, the step size is less than $2/L$. However, many works have observed that in machine learning applications step sizes often do not fulfill this condition, yet (stochastic) gradient descent still converges, albeit in an unstable manner. We investigate this unstable convergence phenomenon from first principles, and discuss key causes behind it. We also identify its main characteristics, and how they interrelate based on both theory and experiments, offering a principled view toward understanding the phenomenon.

preprint2021arXiv

Riemannian Perspective on Matrix Factorization

We study the non-convex matrix factorization approach to matrix completion via Riemannian geometry. Based on an optimization formulation over a Grassmannian manifold, we characterize the landscape based on the notion of principal angles between subspaces. For the fully observed case, our results show that there is a region in which the cost is geodesically convex, and outside of which all critical points are strictly saddle. We empirically study the partially observed case based on our findings.

preprint2020arXiv

A simpler strong refutation of random $k$-XOR

Strong refutation of random CSPs is a fundamental question in theoretical computer science that has received particular attention due to the long-standing gap between the information-theoretic limit and the computational limit. This gap is recently bridged by Raghavendra, Rao and Schramm where they study sub-exponential algorithms for the regime between the two limits. In this work, we take a simpler approach to their algorithm and analysis.

preprint2020arXiv

From Nesterov's Estimate Sequence to Riemannian Acceleration

We propose the first global accelerated gradient method for Riemannian manifolds. Toward establishing our result we revisit Nesterov's estimate sequence technique and develop an alternative analysis for it that may also be of independent interest. Then, we extend this analysis to the Riemannian setting, localizing the key difficulty due to non-Euclidean structure into a certain ``metric distortion.'' We control this distortion by developing a novel geometric inequality, which permits us to propose and analyze a Riemannian counterpart to Nesterov's accelerated gradient method.

preprint2020arXiv

On Tight Convergence Rates of Without-replacement SGD

For solving finite-sum optimization problems, SGD without replacement sampling is empirically shown to outperform SGD. Denoting by $n$ the number of components in the cost and $K$ the number of epochs of the algorithm , several recent works have shown convergence rates of without-replacement SGD that have better dependency on $n$ and $K$ than the baseline rate of $O(1/(nK))$ for SGD. However, there are two main limitations shared among those works: the rates have extra poly-logarithmic factors on $nK$, and denoting by $κ$ the condition number of the problem, the rates hold after $κ^c\log(nK)$ epochs for some $c>0$. In this work, we overcome these limitations by analyzing step sizes that vary across epochs.

preprint2020arXiv

SGD with shuffling: optimal rates without component convexity and large epoch requirements

We study without-replacement SGD for solving finite-sum optimization problems. Specifically, depending on how the indices of the finite-sum are shuffled, we consider the RandomShuffle (shuffle at the beginning of each epoch) and SingleShuffle (shuffle only once) algorithms. First, we establish minimax optimal convergence rates of these algorithms up to poly-log factors. Notably, our analysis is general enough to cover gradient dominated nonconvex costs, and does not rely on the convexity of individual component functions unlike existing optimal convergence results. Secondly, assuming convexity of the individual components, we further sharpen the tight convergence results for RandomShuffle by removing the drawbacks common to all prior arts: large number of epochs required for the results to hold, and extra poly-log factor gaps to the lower bound.