BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Kjetil Røysland

Kjetil Røysland contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologymath.PRmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Hypothetical Treatment Accelerations: Estimating Causal Effects of Kidney Transplants from Observational Data

Patients with end-stage kidney disease can expect to wait for several years before they receive a transplant, all the while their health deteriorates. How would the survival change if we managed to reduce these waiting times? To provide an answer, we present a continuous-time marginal structural model (MSM) of hypothetical scenarios in which the time until treatment is changed. In these scenarios, the treatment process is defined on a hypothetical time scale where time passes at a different rate compared to the time actually observed. Changing the time of the treatment process corresponds to changing the joint probability distribution, thereby making it possible to identify and estimate hypothetical parameters from observational data using previously developed methodology. We demonstrate this treatment-accelerated MSM using observational data from a Norwegian cohort of elderly patients with kidney failure. This model can potentially be useful to health authorities looking to assess the impacts of reducing the waiting times for organ transplantation in a given patient population.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Time-dependent mediators in survival analysis: Modelling direct and indirect effects with the additive hazards model

We discuss causal mediation analyses for survival data and propose a new approach based on the additive hazards model. The emphasis is on a dynamic point of view, that is, understanding how the direct and indirect effects develop over time. Hence, importantly, we allow for a time varying mediator. To define direct and indirect effects in such a longitudinal survival setting we take an interventional approach (Didelez (2018)) where treatment is separated into one aspect affecting the mediator and a different aspect affecting survival. In general, this leads to a version of the non-parametric g-formula (Robins (1986)). In the present paper, we demonstrate that combining the g-formula with the additive hazards model and a sequential linear model for the mediator process results in simple and interpretable expressions for direct and indirect effects in terms of relative survival as well as cumulative hazards. Our results generalise and formalise the method of dynamic path analysis (Fosen et al. (2006), Strohmaier et al. (2015)). An application to data from a clinical trial on blood pressure medication is given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Transforming cumulative hazard estimates

Time to event outcomes are often evaluated on the hazard scale, but interpreting hazards may be difficult. Recently, there has been concern in the causal inference literature that hazards actually have a built in selection-effect that prevents simple causal interpretations. This is even a problem in randomized controlled trials, where hazard ratios have become a standard measure of treatment effects. Modeling on the hazard scale is nevertheless convenient, e.g. to adjust for covariates. Using hazards for intermediate calculations may therefore be desirable. Here, we provide a generic method for transforming hazard estimates consistently to other scales at which these built in selection effects are avoided. The method is based on differential equations, and generalize a well known relation between the Nelson-Aalen and Kaplan-Meier estimators. Using the martingale central limit theorem we also find that covariances can be estimated consistently for a large class of estimators, thus allowing for rapid calculations of confidence intervals. Hence, given cumulative hazard estimates based on e.g. Aalen's additive hazard model, we can obtain many other parameters without much more effort. We present several examples and associated estimators. Coverage and convergence speed is explored using simulations, suggesting that reliable estimates can be obtained in real-life scenarios.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Counterfactual analyses with graphical models based on local independence

We show that one can perform causal inference in a natural way for continuous-time scenarios using tools from stochastic analysis. This provides new alternatives to the positivity condition for inverse probability weighting. The probability distribution that would govern the frequency of observations in the counterfactual scenario can be characterized in terms of a so-called martingale problem. The counterfactual and factual probability distributions may be related through a likelihood ratio given by a stochastic differential equation. We can perform inference for counterfactual scenarios based on the original observations, re-weighted according to this likelihood ratio. This is possible if the solution of the stochastic differential equation is uniformly integrable, a property that can be determined by comparing the corresponding factual and counterfactual short-term predictions. Local independence graphs are directed, possibly cyclic, graphs that represent short-term prediction among sufficiently autonomous stochastic processes. We show through an example that these graphs can be used to identify and provide consistent estimators for counterfactual parameters in continuous time. This is analogous to how Judea Pearl uses graphical information to identify causal effects in finite state Bayesian networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A martingale approach to continuous-time marginal structural models

Marginal structural models were introduced in order to provide estimates of causal effects from interventions based on observational studies in epidemiological research. The key point is that this can be understood in terms of Girsanov's change of measure. This offers a mathematical interpretation of marginal structural models that has not been available before. We consider both a model of an observational study and a model of a hypothetical randomized trial. These models correspond to different martingale measures -- the observational measure and the randomized trial measure -- on some underlying space. We describe situations where the randomized trial measure is absolutely continuous with respect to the observational measure. The resulting continuous-time likelihood ratio process with respect to these two probability measures corresponds to the weights in discrete-time marginal structural models. In order to do inference for the hypothetical randomized trial, we can simulate samples using observational data weighted by this likelihood ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access