Researcher profile

Kewang Chen

Kewang Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Composite Anderson acceleration method with dynamic window-sizes and optimized damping

In this paper, we propose and analyze a set of fully non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithms with dynamic window sizes and optimized damping. Although Anderson acceleration (AA) has been used for decades to speed up nonlinear solvers in many applications, most authors are simply using and analyzing the stationary version of Anderson acceleration (sAA) with fixed window size and a constant damping factor. The behavior and potential of the non-stationary version of Anderson acceleration methods remain an open question. Since most efficient linear solvers use composable algorithmic components. Similar ideas can be used for AA to solve nonlinear systems. Thus in the present work, to develop non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithms, we first propose two systematic ways to dynamically alternate the window size $m$ by composition. One simple way to package sAA(m) with sAA(n) in each iteration is applying sAA(m) and sAA(n) separately and then average their results. It is an additive composite combination. The other more important way is the multiplicative composite combination, which means we apply sAA(m) in the outer loop and apply sAA(n) in the inner loop. By doing this, significant gains can be achieved. Secondly, to make AA to be a fully non-stationary algorithm, we need to combine these strategies with our recent work on the non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithm with optimized damping (AAoptD), which is another important direction of producing non-stationary AA and nice performance gains have been observed. Moreover, we also investigate the rate of convergence of these non-stationary AA methods under suitable assumptions. Finally, our numerical results show that some of these proposed non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithms converge faster than the stationary sAA method and they may significantly reduce the storage and time to find the solution in many cases.

preprint2022arXiv

Non-stationary Anderson acceleration with optimized damping

Anderson acceleration (AA) has a long history of use and a strong recent interest due to its potential ability to dramatically improve the linear convergence of the fixed-point iteration. Most authors are simply using and analyzing the stationary version of Anderson acceleration (sAA) with a constant damping factor or without damping. Little attention has been paid to nonstationary algorithms. However, damping can be useful and is sometimes crucial for simulations in which the underlying fixed-point operator is not globally contractive. The role of this damping factor has not been fully understood. In the present work, we consider the non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithm with optimized damping (AAoptD) in each iteration to further speed up linear and nonlinear iterations by applying one extra inexpensive optimization. We analyze this procedure and develop an efficient and inexpensive implementation scheme. We also show that, compared with the stationary Anderson acceleration with fixed window size sAA(m), optimizing the damping factors is related to dynamically packaging sAA(m) and sAA(1) in each iteration (alternating window size $m$ is another direction of producing non-stationary AA). Moreover, we show by extensive numerical experiments that the proposed non-stationary Anderson acceleration with optimized damping procedure often converges much faster than stationary AA with constant damping or without damping.