BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Cornelis Vuik

Cornelis Vuik contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysisphysics.flu-dyn

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Simulation of CO2 Storage using a Parameterization Method for Essential Trapping Physics: FluidFlower Benchmark Study

An efficient compositional framework is developed for simulation of CO2 storage in saline aquifers during a full-cycle injection, migration and post-migration processes. Essential trapping mechanisms, including structural, dissolution, and residual trapping, which operate at different time scales are accurately captured in the presented unified framework. In particular, a parameterization method is proposed to efficiently describe the relevant physical processes. The proposed framework is validated by comparing the dynamics of gravity-induced convective transport with that reported in the literature. Results show good agreement for both the characteristics of descending fingers and the associated dissolution rate. The developed simulator is then applied to study the FluidFlower benchmark model. An experimental setup with heterogeneous geological layers is discretized into a two-dimensional computational domain where numerical simulation is performed. Impacts of hysteresis and the diffusion of CO2 in liquid phase on the migration and trapping of CO2 plume are investigated. Inclusion of the hysteresis effect does not affect plume migration in this benchmark model, whereas diffusion plays an important role in promoting convective mixing. This work casts a promising approach to predict the migration of the CO2 plume, and to assess the amount of trapping from different mechanisms for long-term CO2 storage.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Composite Anderson acceleration method with dynamic window-sizes and optimized damping

In this paper, we propose and analyze a set of fully non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithms with dynamic window sizes and optimized damping. Although Anderson acceleration (AA) has been used for decades to speed up nonlinear solvers in many applications, most authors are simply using and analyzing the stationary version of Anderson acceleration (sAA) with fixed window size and a constant damping factor. The behavior and potential of the non-stationary version of Anderson acceleration methods remain an open question. Since most efficient linear solvers use composable algorithmic components. Similar ideas can be used for AA to solve nonlinear systems. Thus in the present work, to develop non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithms, we first propose two systematic ways to dynamically alternate the window size $m$ by composition. One simple way to package sAA(m) with sAA(n) in each iteration is applying sAA(m) and sAA(n) separately and then average their results. It is an additive composite combination. The other more important way is the multiplicative composite combination, which means we apply sAA(m) in the outer loop and apply sAA(n) in the inner loop. By doing this, significant gains can be achieved. Secondly, to make AA to be a fully non-stationary algorithm, we need to combine these strategies with our recent work on the non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithm with optimized damping (AAoptD), which is another important direction of producing non-stationary AA and nice performance gains have been observed. Moreover, we also investigate the rate of convergence of these non-stationary AA methods under suitable assumptions. Finally, our numerical results show that some of these proposed non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithms converge faster than the stationary sAA method and they may significantly reduce the storage and time to find the solution in many cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Non-stationary Anderson acceleration with optimized damping

Anderson acceleration (AA) has a long history of use and a strong recent interest due to its potential ability to dramatically improve the linear convergence of the fixed-point iteration. Most authors are simply using and analyzing the stationary version of Anderson acceleration (sAA) with a constant damping factor or without damping. Little attention has been paid to nonstationary algorithms. However, damping can be useful and is sometimes crucial for simulations in which the underlying fixed-point operator is not globally contractive. The role of this damping factor has not been fully understood. In the present work, we consider the non-stationary Anderson acceleration algorithm with optimized damping (AAoptD) in each iteration to further speed up linear and nonlinear iterations by applying one extra inexpensive optimization. We analyze this procedure and develop an efficient and inexpensive implementation scheme. We also show that, compared with the stationary Anderson acceleration with fixed window size sAA(m), optimizing the damping factors is related to dynamically packaging sAA(m) and sAA(1) in each iteration (alternating window size $m$ is another direction of producing non-stationary AA). Moreover, we show by extensive numerical experiments that the proposed non-stationary Anderson acceleration with optimized damping procedure often converges much faster than stationary AA with constant damping or without damping.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Role of PDE-Based Parameterization Techniques in Gradient-Based IGA Shape Optimization Applications

This paper proposes a shape optimization algorithm based on the principles of Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) in which the parameterization of the geometry enters the problem formulation as an additional PDE-constraint. Inspired by the isoparametric principle of IGA, the parameterization and the governing state equation are treated using the same numerical technique. This leads to a scheme that is comparatively easy to differentiate, allowing for a fully symbolic derivation of the gradient and subsequent gradient-based optimization. To improve the efficiency and robustness of the scheme, the basis is re-selected during each optimization iteration and adjusted to the current needs. The scheme is validated in two test cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access