Researcher profile

Keitaro Nakasai

Keitaro Nakasai contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Software Engineering Machine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline

2works

0followers

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Measuring Cognitive Load of Software Developers Based on Nasal Skin Temperature

It has recently become increasingly important to measure the cognitive load of developers. This is because continuing with a development under a high cognitive load may cause human errors. Therefore, to automatically measure the cognitive load, existing studies have used biometric measures such as brain waves and the heart rate. However, developers are often required to equip certain devices when measuring them, and can therefore be physically burdened. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of non-invasive biometric measures based on the nasal skin temperature. The nasal skin temperature has been widely used in other fields to measure mental status. In the present experiment, the subjects created small Java programs, and we estimated their cognitive load using the proposed biometric measures based on the nasal skin temperature. As a result, the proposed biometric measures were shown to be more effective than non-biometric measures. Hence, biometric measures based on nasal skin temperature are promising for estimating the cognitive load of developers.

preprint2020arXiv

A Simulation Study of Bandit Algorithms to Address External Validity of Software Fault Prediction

Various software fault prediction models and techniques for building algorithms have been proposed. Many studies have compared and evaluated them to identify the most effective ones. However, in most cases, such models and techniques do not have the best performance on every dataset. This is because there is diversity of software development datasets, and therefore, there is a risk that the selected model or technique shows bad performance on a certain dataset. To avoid selecting a low accuracy model, we apply bandit algorithms to predict faults. Consider a case where player has 100 coins to bet on several slot machines. Ordinary usage of software fault prediction is analogous to the player betting all 100 coins in one slot machine. In contrast, bandit algorithms bet one coin on each machine (i.e., use prediction models) step-by-step to seek the best machine. In the experiment, we developed an artificial dataset that includes 100 modules, 15 of which include faults. Then, we developed various artificial fault prediction models and selected them dynamically using bandit algorithms. The Thomson sampling algorithm showed the best or second-best prediction performance compared with using only one prediction model.