BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Kathrin Bujna

Kathrin Bujna appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Machine LearningData Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Hard-Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Models

Training the parameters of statistical models to describe a given data set is a central task in the field of data mining and machine learning. A very popular and powerful way of parameter estimation is the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Among the most widely used families of statistical models are mixture models, especially, mixtures of Gaussian distributions. A popular hard-clustering variant of the MLE problem is the so-called complete-data maximum likelihood estimation (CMLE) method. The standard approach to solve the CMLE problem is the Classification-Expectation-Maximization (CEM) algorithm. Unfortunately, it is only guaranteed that the algorithm converges to some (possibly arbitrarily poor) stationary point of the objective function. In this paper, we present two algorithms for a restricted version of the CMLE problem. That is, our algorithms approximate reasonable solutions to the CMLE problem which satisfy certain natural properties. Moreover, they compute solutions whose cost (i.e. complete-data log-likelihood values) are at most a factor $(1+ε)$ worse than the cost of the solutions that we search for. Note the CMLE problem in its most general, i.e. unrestricted, form is not well defined and allows for trivial optimal solutions that can be thought of as degenerated solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Complexity and Approximation of the Fuzzy K-Means Problem

The fuzzy $K$-means problem is a generalization of the classical $K$-means problem to soft clusterings, i.e. clusterings where each points belongs to each cluster to some degree. Although popular in practice, prior to this work the fuzzy $K$-means problem has not been studied from a complexity theoretic or algorithmic perspective. We show that optimal solutions for fuzzy $K$-means cannot, in general, be expressed by radicals over the input points. Surprisingly, this already holds for very simple inputs in one-dimensional space. Hence, one cannot expect to compute optimal solutions exactly. We give the first $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithms for the fuzzy $K$-means problem. First, we present a deterministic approximation algorithm whose runtime is polynomial in $N$ and linear in the dimension $D$ of the input set, given that $K$ is constant, i.e. a polynomial time approximation algorithm given a fixed $K$. We achieve this result by showing that for each soft clustering there exists a hard clustering with comparable properties. Second, by using techniques known from coreset constructions for the $K$-means problem, we develop a deterministic approximation algorithm that runs in time almost linear in $N$ but exponential in the dimension $D$. We complement these results with a randomized algorithm which imposes some natural restrictions on the input set and whose runtime is comparable to some of the most efficient approximation algorithms for $K$-means, i.e. linear in the number of points and the dimension, but exponential in the number of clusters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Theoretical and Experimental Comparison of the EM and SEM Algorithm

In this paper we provide a new analysis of the SEM algorithm. Unlike previous work, we focus on the analysis of a single run of the algorithm. First, we discuss the algorithm for general mixture distributions. Second, we consider Gaussian mixture models and show that with high probability the update equations of the EM algorithm and its stochastic variant are almost the same, given that the input set is sufficiently large. Our experiments confirm that this still holds for a large number of successive update steps. In particular, for Gaussian mixture models, we show that the stochastic variant runs nearly twice as fast.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access