BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Katharina T. Huber

Katharina T. Huber appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.COPopulations and EvolutionQuantitative MethodsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.MG

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Forest-based networks

In evolutionary studies it is common to use phylogenetic trees to represent the evolutionary history of a set of species. However, in case the transfer of genes or other genetic information between the species or their ancestors has occurred in the past, a tree may not provide a complete picture of their history. In such cases,tree-based phylogenetic networks can provide a useful, more refined representation of the species evolution. Such a network is essentially a phylogenetic tree with some arcs added between the tree edges so as to represent reticulate events such as gene transfer. Even so, this model does not permit the representation of evolutionary scenarios where reticulate events have taken place between different subfamilies or lineages of species. To represent such scenarios, in this paper we introduce the notion of a forest-based phylogenetic network, that is, a collection of leaf-disjoint phylogenetic trees on a set of species with arcs added between the edges of distinct trees within the collection. Forest-based networks include the recently introduced class of overlaid species forests which are used to model introgression. As we shall see, even though the definition of forest-based networks is closely related to that of tree-based networks, they lead to new mathematical theory which complements that of tree-based networks. As well as studying the relationship of forest-based networks with other classes of phylogenetic networks, such as tree-child networks and universal tree-based networks, we present some characterizations of some special classes of forest-based networks. We expect that our results will be useful for developing new models and algorithms to understand reticulate evolution, such as gene transfer between collections of bacteria that live in different environments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The hybrid number of a ploidy profile

Polyploidization, whereby an organism inherits multiple copies of the genome of their parents, is an important evolutionary event that has been observed in plants and animals. One way to study such events is in terms of the ploidy number of the species that make up a dataset of interest. It is therefore natural to ask: How much information about the evolutionary past of the set of species that form a dataset can be gleaned from the ploidy numbers of the species? To help answer this question, we introduce and study the novel concept of a ploidy profile which allows us to formalize it in terms of a multiplicity vector indexed by the species the dataset is comprised of. Using the framework of a phylogenetic network, we present a closed formula for computing the hybrid number (i.e. the minimal number of polyploidization events required to explain a ploidy profile) of a large class of ploidy profiles. This formula relies on the construction of a certain phylogenetic network from the simplification sequence of a ploidy profile and the hybrid number of the ploidy profile with which this construction is initialized. Both of them can be computed easily in case the ploidy numbers that make up the ploidy profile are not too large. To help illustrate the applicability of our approach, we apply it to a simplified version of a publicly available Viola dataset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Recognizing and realizing cactus metrics

The problem of realizing finite metric spaces in terms of weighted graphs has many applications. For example, the mathematical and computational properties of metrics that can be realized by trees have been well-studied and such research has laid the foundation of the reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from evolutionary distances. However, as trees may be too restrictive to accurately represent real-world data or phenomena, it is important to understand the relationship between more general graphs and distances. In this paper, we introduce a new type of metric called a cactus metric, that is, a metric that can be realized by a cactus graph. We show that, just as with tree metrics, a cactus metric has a unique optimal realization. In addition, we describe an algorithm that can recognize whether or not a metric is a cactus metric and, if so, compute its optimal realization in $O(n^3)$ time, where $n$ is the number of points in the space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Transforming phylogenetic networks: Moving beyond tree space

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that are used to represent reticulate evolution. Unrooted phylogenetic networks form a special class of such networks, which naturally generalize unrooted phylogenetic trees. In this paper we define two operations on unrooted phylogenetic networks, one of which is a generalization of the well-known nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) operation on phylogenetic trees. We show that any unrooted phylogenetic network can be transformed into any other such network using only these operations. This generalizes the well-known fact that any phylogenetic tree can be transformed into any other such tree using only NNI operations. It also allows us to define a generalization of tree space and to define some new metrics on unrooted phylogenetic networks. To prove our main results, we employ some fascinating new connections between phylogenetic networks and cubic graphs that we have recently discovered. Our results should be useful in developing new strategies to search for optimal phylogenetic networks, a topic that has recently generated some interest in the literature, as well as for providing new ways to compare networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bridging the gap between rooted and unrooted phylogenetic networks

The need for structures capable of accommodating complex evolutionary signals such as those found in, for example, wheat has fueled research into phylogenetic networks. Such structures generalize the standard phylogenetic tree model by also allowing cycles and have been introduced in rooted and unrooted form. In contrast to phylogenetic trees, however, surprisingly little is known about the interplay between both types thus hampering our ability to make much needed progress for rooted phylogenetic networks by drawing on insights from their much better understood unrooted counterparts. Unrooted phylogenetic networks are underpinned by split systems and by focusing on them we establish a first link between both types. More precisely, we develop a link between 1-nested phylogenetic networks which are examples of rooted phylogenetic networks and the well-studied median networks (aka Buneman graph) which are examples of unrooted phylogenetic networks. In particular, we show that not only can a 1-nested network be obtained from a median network but also that that network is, in a well-defined sense, optimal. Along the way, we characterize circular split systems in terms of the novel $\mathcal I$-intersection closure of a split system and establish the 1-nested analogue of the fundamental "Splits Equivalence Theorem" for phylogenetic trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Folding and unfolding phylogenetic trees and networks

Phylogenetic networks are rooted, labelled directed acyclic graphs which are commonly used to represent reticulate evolution. There is a close relationship between phylogenetic networks and multi-labelled trees (MUL-trees). Indeed, any phylogenetic network $N$ can be 'unfolded' to obtain a MUL-tree $U(N)$ and, conversely, a MUL-tree $T$ can in certain circumstances be 'folded' to obtain a phylogenetic network $F(T)$ that exhibits $T$. In this paper, we study properties of the operations $U$ and $F$ in more detail. In particular, we introduce the class of stable networks, phylogenetic networks $N$ for which $F(U(N))$ is isomorphic to $N$, characterise such networks, and show that that they are related to the well-known class of tree-sibling networks. We also explore how the concept of displaying a tree in a network $N$ can be related to displaying the tree in the MUL-tree $U(N)$. To do this, we develop a phylogenetic analogue of graph fibrations. This allows us to view $U(N)$ as the analogue of the universal cover of a digraph, and to establish a close connection between displaying trees in $U(N)$ and reconciling phylogenetic trees with networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Representing Partitions on Trees

In evolutionary biology, biologists often face the problem of constructing a phylogenetic tree on a set $X$ of species from a multiset $Π$ of partitions corresponding to various attributes of these species. One approach that is used to solve this problem is to try instead to associate a tree (or even a network) to the multiset $Σ_Π$ consisting of all those bipartitions $\{A,X-A\}$ with $A$ a part of some partition in $Π$. The rational behind this approach is that a phylogenetic tree with leaf set $X$ can be uniquely represented by the set of bipartitions of $X$ induced by its edges. Motivated by these considerations, given a multiset $Σ$ of bipartitions corresponding to a phylogenetic tree on $X$, in this paper we introduce and study the set $P(Σ)$ consisting of those multisets of partitions $Π$ of $X$ with $Σ_Π=Σ$. More specifically, we characterize when $P(Σ)$ is non-empty, and also identify some partitions in $P(Σ)$ that are of maximum and minimum size. We also show that it is NP-complete to decide when $P(Σ)$ is non-empty in case $Σ$ is an arbitrary multiset of bipartitions of $X$. Ultimately, we hope that by gaining a better understanding of the mapping that takes an arbitrary partition system $Π$ to the multiset $Σ_Π$, we will obtain new insights into the use of median networks and, more generally, split-networks to visualize sets of partitions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Distinguished minimal toplogical lassos

A classical result in distance based tree-reconstruction characterizes when for a distance $D$ on some finite set $X$ there exist a uniquely determined dendrogram on $X$ (essentially a rooted tree $T=(V,E)$ with leaf set $X$ and no degree two vertices but possibly the root and an edge weighting $ω:E\to \mathbb R_{\geq 0}$) such that the distance $D_{(T,ω)}$ induced by $(T,ω)$ on $X$ is $D$. Moreover, algorithms that quickly reconstruct $(T,ω)$ from $D$ in this case are known. However in many areas where dendrograms are being constructed such as Computational Biology not all distances on $X$ are always available implying that the sought after dendrogram need not be uniquely determined anymore by the available distances with regards to topology of the underlying tree, edge-weighting, or both. To better understand the structural properties a set $\cL\subseteq {X\choose 2}$ has to satisfy to overcome this problem, various types of lassos have been introduced. Here, we focus on the question of when a lasso uniquely determines the topology of a dendrogram's underlying tree, that is, it is a topological lasso for that tree. We show that any set-inclusion minimal topological lasso for such a tree $T$ can be transformed into a 'distinguished' minimal topological lasso $\cL$ for $T$, that is, the graph $(X,\cL)$ is a claw-free block graph. Furthermore, we characterize such lassos in terms of the novel concept of a cluster marker map for $T$ and present results concerning the heritability of such lassos in the context of the subtree and supertree problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Lassoing and corraling rooted phylogenetic trees

The construction of a dendogram on a set of individuals is a key component of a genomewide association study. However even with modern sequencing technologies the distances on the individuals required for the construction of such a structure may not always be reliable making it tempting to exclude them from an analysis. This, in turn, results in an input set for dendogram construction that consists of only partial distance information which raises the following fundamental question. For what subset of its leaf set can we reconstruct uniquely the dendogram from the distances that it induces on that subset. By formalizing a dendogram in terms of an edge-weighted, rooted phylogenetic tree on a pre-given finite set X with |X|>2 whose edge-weighting is equidistant and a set of partial distances on X in terms of a set L of 2-subsets of X, we investigate this problem in terms of when such a tree is lassoed, that is, uniquely determined by the elements in L. For this we consider four different formalizations of the idea of "uniquely determining" giving rise to four distinct types of lassos. We present characterizations for all of them in terms of the child-edge graphs of the interior vertices of such a tree. Our characterizations imply in particular that in case the tree in question is binary then all four types of lasso must coincide.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Recognizing Treelike k-Dissimilarities

A k-dissimilarity D on a finite set X, |X| >= k, is a map from the set of size k subsets of X to the real numbers. Such maps naturally arise from edge-weighted trees T with leaf-set X: Given a subset Y of X of size k, D(Y) is defined to be the total length of the smallest subtree of T with leaf-set Y . In case k = 2, it is well-known that 2-dissimilarities arising in this way can be characterized by the so-called "4-point condition". However, in case k > 2 Pachter and Speyer recently posed the following question: Given an arbitrary k-dissimilarity, how do we test whether this map comes from a tree? In this paper, we provide an answer to this question, showing that for k >= 3 a k-dissimilarity on a set X arises from a tree if and only if its restriction to every 2k-element subset of X arises from some tree, and that 2k is the least possible subset size to ensure that this is the case. As a corollary, we show that there exists a polynomial-time algorithm to determine when a k-dissimilarity arises from a tree. We also give a 6-point condition for determining when a 3-dissimilarity arises from a tree, that is similar to the aforementioned 4-point condition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Reconstructing fully-resolved trees from triplet cover distances

It is a classical result that any finite tree with positively weighted edges, and without vertices of degree 2, is uniquely determined by the weighted path distance between each pair of leaves. Moreover, it is possible for a (small) strict subset $\cl$ of leaf pairs to suffice for reconstructing the tree and its edge weights, given just the distances between the leaf pairs in $\cl$. It is known that any set $\cl$ with this property for a tree in which all interior vertices have degree 3 must form a {\em cover} for $T$ -- that is, for each interior vertex $v$ of $T$, $\cl$ must contain a pair of leaves from each pair of the three components of $T-v$. Here we provide a partial converse of this result by showing that if a set $\cl$ of leaf pairs forms a cover of a certain type for such a tree $T$ then $T$ and its edge weights can be uniquely determined from the distances between the pairs of leaves in $\cl$. Moreover, there is a polynomial-time algorithm for achieving this reconstruction. The result establishes a special case of a recent question concerning `triplet covers', and is relevant to a problem arising in evolutionary genomics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

A Note on Encodings of Phylogenetic Networks of Bounded Level

Driven by the need for better models that allow one to shed light into the question how life's diversity has evolved, phylogenetic networks have now joined phylogenetic trees in the center of phylogenetics research. Like phylogenetic trees, such networks canonically induce collections of phylogenetic trees, clusters, and triplets, respectively. Thus it is not surprising that many network approaches aim to reconstruct a phylogenetic network from such collections. Related to the well-studied perfect phylogeny problem, the following question is of fundamental importance in this context: When does one of the above collections encode (i.e. uniquely describe) the network that induces it? In this note, we present a complete answer to this question for the special case of a level-1 (phylogenetic) network by characterizing those level-1 networks for which an encoding in terms of one (or equivalently all) of the above collections exists. Given that this type of network forms the first layer of the rich hierarchy of level-k networks, k a non-negative integer, it is natural to wonder whether our arguments could be extended to members of that hierarchy for higher values for k. By giving examples, we show that this is not the case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access