BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Guillaume E. Scholz

Guillaume E. Scholz appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.CODiscrete Mathematics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Compatible split systems on a multiset

A split system on a multiset $\mathcal M$ is a set of bipartitions of $\mathcal M$. Such a split system $\mathfrak S$ is compatible if it can be represented by a tree in such a way that the vertices of the tree are labelled by the elements in $\mathcal M$, the removal of each edge in the tree yields a bipartition in $\mathfrak S$ by taking the labels of the two resulting components, and every bipartition in $\mathfrak S$ can be obtained from the tree in this way. In this contribution, we present a novel characterization for compatible split systems, and for split systems admitting a unique tree representation. In addition, we show that a conjecture on compatibility stated in 2008 holds for some large classes of split systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Forest-based networks

In evolutionary studies it is common to use phylogenetic trees to represent the evolutionary history of a set of species. However, in case the transfer of genes or other genetic information between the species or their ancestors has occurred in the past, a tree may not provide a complete picture of their history. In such cases,tree-based phylogenetic networks can provide a useful, more refined representation of the species evolution. Such a network is essentially a phylogenetic tree with some arcs added between the tree edges so as to represent reticulate events such as gene transfer. Even so, this model does not permit the representation of evolutionary scenarios where reticulate events have taken place between different subfamilies or lineages of species. To represent such scenarios, in this paper we introduce the notion of a forest-based phylogenetic network, that is, a collection of leaf-disjoint phylogenetic trees on a set of species with arcs added between the edges of distinct trees within the collection. Forest-based networks include the recently introduced class of overlaid species forests which are used to model introgression. As we shall see, even though the definition of forest-based networks is closely related to that of tree-based networks, they lead to new mathematical theory which complements that of tree-based networks. As well as studying the relationship of forest-based networks with other classes of phylogenetic networks, such as tree-child networks and universal tree-based networks, we present some characterizations of some special classes of forest-based networks. We expect that our results will be useful for developing new models and algorithms to understand reticulate evolution, such as gene transfer between collections of bacteria that live in different environments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

From Modular Decomposition Trees to Level-1 Networks: Pseudo-Cographs, Polar-Cats and Prime Polar-Cats

The modular decomposition of a graph $G$ is a natural construction to capture key features of $G$ in terms of a labeled tree $(T,t)$ whose vertices are labeled as "series" ($1$), "parallel" ($0$) or "prime". However, full information of $G$ is provided by its modular decomposition tree $(T,t)$ only, if $G$ does not contain prime modules. In this case, $(T,t)$ explains $G$, i.e., $\{x,y\}\in E(G)$ if and only if the lowest common ancestor $\mathrm{lca}_T(x,y)$ of $x$ and $y$ has label "$1$". This information, however, gets lost whenever $(T,t)$ contains vertices with label "prime". In this contribution, we aim at replacing "prime" vertices in $(T,t)$ by simple 0/1-labeled cycles, which leads to the concept of rooted labeled level-1 networks $(N,t)$. We characterize graphs that can be explained by such level-1 networks $(N,t)$, which generalizes the concept of graphs that can be explained by labeled trees, that is, cographs. We provide three novel graph classes: \emph{polar-cats} are a proper subclass of \emph{pseudo-cographs} which forms a proper subclass of \emph{prime polar-cats}. In particular, every cograph is a pseudo-cograph and prime polar-cats are precisely those graphs that can be explained by a labeled level-1 network. The class of prime polar-cats is defined in terms of the modular decomposition of graphs and the property that all prime modules "induce" polar-cats. We provide a plethora of structural results and characterizations for graphs of these new classes. In addition, we show under which conditions there is a unique least-resolved labeled level-1 network that explains a given graph and provide linear-time algorithms to recognize all these types of graphs and to construct level-1 networks to explain them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bridging the gap between rooted and unrooted phylogenetic networks

The need for structures capable of accommodating complex evolutionary signals such as those found in, for example, wheat has fueled research into phylogenetic networks. Such structures generalize the standard phylogenetic tree model by also allowing cycles and have been introduced in rooted and unrooted form. In contrast to phylogenetic trees, however, surprisingly little is known about the interplay between both types thus hampering our ability to make much needed progress for rooted phylogenetic networks by drawing on insights from their much better understood unrooted counterparts. Unrooted phylogenetic networks are underpinned by split systems and by focusing on them we establish a first link between both types. More precisely, we develop a link between 1-nested phylogenetic networks which are examples of rooted phylogenetic networks and the well-studied median networks (aka Buneman graph) which are examples of unrooted phylogenetic networks. In particular, we show that not only can a 1-nested network be obtained from a median network but also that that network is, in a well-defined sense, optimal. Along the way, we characterize circular split systems in terms of the novel $\mathcal I$-intersection closure of a split system and establish the 1-nested analogue of the fundamental "Splits Equivalence Theorem" for phylogenetic trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access