Researcher profile

Karthi Balasubramanian

Karthi Balasubramanian contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Comment on 'Interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv Complexity Measure in the context of Biomedical Signal Analysis'

In this Communication, we express our reservations on some aspects of the interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv Complexity measure (LZ) by Mateo et al. in "Interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv complexity measure in the context of biomedical signal analysis," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2282-2288, Nov. 2006. In particular, we comment on the dependence of the LZ complexity measure on number of harmonics, frequency content and amplitude modulation. We disagree with the following statements made by Mateo et al. 1. "LZ is not sensitive to the number of harmonics in periodic signals." 2. "LZ increases as the frequency of a sinusoid increases." 3. "Amplitude modulation of a signal doesnot result in an increase in LZ." We show the dependence of LZ complexity measure on harmonics and amplitude modulation by using a modified version of the synthetic signal that has been used in the original paper. Also, the second statement is a generic statement which is not entirely true. This is true only in the low frequency regime and definitely not true in moderate and high frequency regimes.

preprint2012arXiv

Classification of Periodic, Chaotic and Random Sequences using NSRPS Complexity Measure

Data compression algorithms are generally perceived as being of interest for data communication and storage purposes only. However, their use in the field of data classification and analysis is also of equal importance. Automatic data classification and analysis finds use in varied fields like bioinformatics, language and sequence recognition and authorship attribution. Different complexity measures proposed in literature like Shannon entropy, Relative entropy, Kolmogrov and Algorithmic complexity have drawbacks that make these methods ineffective in analyzing short sequences that are typical in population dynamics and other fields. In this paper, we study Non-Sequential Recursive Pair Substitution (NSRPS), a lossless compression algorithm first proposed by Ebeling {\it et al.} [Math. Biosc. 52, 1980] and Jiménez-Montaño {\it et al.} [arXiv:cond-mat/0204134, 2002]). Using this algorithm, a new complexity measure was recently proposed (Nagaraj {\it et al.} [arXiv:nlin.CD/1101.4341v1, 2011]). In this work, we use NSRPS complexity measure for analyzing and classifying symbolic sequences generated by 1D chaotic dynamical systems. Even with learning data-sets of length as small as 25 and test data-sets of length as small as 10, NSRPS measure is able to accurately classify the test sequence as periodic, chaotic or random. For such short data lengths, methods which use entropy measure and traditional lossless compression algorithm like LZ77 [A.Lempel and J.Ziv, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory {\bf 22}, 75 (1976)] (used for instance by {\it Gzip}, {\it Winzip} etc.) fails.