Researcher profile

Karin Stacke

Karin Stacke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Learning Representations with Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Histopathology Applications

Unsupervised learning has made substantial progress over the last few years, especially by means of contrastive self-supervised learning. The dominating dataset for benchmarking self-supervised learning has been ImageNet, for which recent methods are approaching the performance achieved by fully supervised training. The ImageNet dataset is however largely object-centric, and it is not clear yet what potential those methods have on widely different datasets and tasks that are not object-centric, such as in digital pathology. While self-supervised learning has started to be explored within this area with encouraging results, there is reason to look closer at how this setting differs from natural images and ImageNet. In this paper we make an in-depth analysis of contrastive learning for histopathology, pin-pointing how the contrastive objective will behave differently due to the characteristics of histopathology data. We bring forward a number of considerations, such as view generation for the contrastive objective and hyper-parameter tuning. In a large battery of experiments, we analyze how the downstream performance in tissue classification will be affected by these considerations. The results point to how contrastive learning can reduce the annotation effort within digital pathology, but that the specific dataset characteristics need to be considered. To take full advantage of the contrastive learning objective, different calibrations of view generation and hyper-parameters are required. Our results pave the way for realizing the full potential of self-supervised learning for histopathology applications.

preprint2020arXiv

A Study of Deep Learning Colon Cancer Detection in Limited Data Access Scenarios

Digitization of histopathology slides has led to several advances, from easy data sharing and collaborations to the development of digital diagnostic tools. Deep learning (DL) methods for classification and detection have shown great potential, but often require large amounts of training data that are hard to collect, and annotate. For many cancer types, the scarceness of data creates barriers for training DL models. One such scenario relates to detecting tumor metastasis in lymph node tissue, where the low ratio of tumor to non-tumor cells makes the diagnostic task hard and time-consuming. DL-based tools can allow faster diagnosis, with potentially increased quality. Unfortunately, due to the sparsity of tumor cells, annotating this type of data demands a high level of effort from pathologists. Using weak annotations from slide-level images have shown great potential, but demand access to a substantial amount of data as well. In this study, we investigate mitigation strategies for limited data access scenarios. Particularly, we address whether it is possible to exploit mutual structure between tissues to develop general techniques, wherein data from one type of cancer in a particular tissue could have diagnostic value for other cancers in other tissues. Our case is exemplified by a DL model for metastatic colon cancer detection in lymph nodes. Could such a model be trained with little or even no lymph node data? As alternative data sources, we investigate 1) tumor cells taken from the primary colon tumor tissue, and 2) cancer data from a different organ (breast), either as is or transformed to the target domain (colon) using Cycle-GANs. We show that the suggested approaches make it possible to detect cancer metastasis with no or very little lymph node data, opening up for the possibility that existing, annotated histopathology data could generalize to other domains.