BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Karim Ali

Karim Ali appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer VisionComputer Science and Game TheoryCryptography and SecurityMachine LearningNeural and Evolutionary ComputingSoftware Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Game-Theoretic Malware Detection

Malware attacks are costly. To mitigate against such attacks, organizations deploy malware detection tools that help them detect and eventually resolve those threats. While running only the best available tool does not provide enough coverage of the potential attacks, running all available tools is prohibitively expensive in terms of financial cost and computing resources. Therefore, an organization typically runs a set of tools that maximizes their coverage given a limited budget. However, how should an organization choose that set? Attackers are strategic, and will change their behavior to preferentially exploit the gaps left by a deterministic choice of tools. To avoid leaving such easily-exploited gaps, the defender must choose a random set. In this paper, we present an approach to compute an optimal randomization over size-bounded sets of available security analysis tools by modeling the relationship between attackers and security analysts as a leader-follower Stackelberg security game. We estimate the parameters of our model by combining the information from the VirusTotal dataset with the more detailed reports from the National Vulnerability Database. In an empirical comparison, our approach outperforms a set of natural baselines under a wide range of assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Time-Based Conclusion Stability of Cross-Project Defect Prediction Models

Researchers in empirical software engineering often make claims based on observable data such as defect reports. Unfortunately, in many cases, these claims are generalized beyond the data sets that have been evaluated. Will the researcher's conclusions hold a year from now for the same software projects? Perhaps not. Recent studies show that in the area of Software Analytics, conclusions over different data sets are usually inconsistent. In this article, we empirically investigate whether conclusions in the area of defect prediction truly exhibit stability throughout time or not. Our investigation applies a time-aware evaluation approach where models are trained only on the past, and evaluations are executed only on the future. Through this time-aware evaluation, we show that depending on which time period we evaluate defect predictors, their performance, in terms of F-Score, the area under the curve (AUC), and Mathews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), varies and their results are not consistent. The next release of a product, which is significantly different from its prior release, may drastically change defect prediction performance. Therefore, without knowing about the conclusion stability, empirical software engineering researchers should limit their claims of performance within the contexts of evaluation, because broad claims about defect prediction performance might be contradicted by the next upcoming release of a product under analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Learning Deep Object Detectors from 3D Models

Crowdsourced 3D CAD models are becoming easily accessible online, and can potentially generate an infinite number of training images for almost any object category.We show that augmenting the training data of contemporary Deep Convolutional Neural Net (DCNN) models with such synthetic data can be effective, especially when real training data is limited or not well matched to the target domain. Most freely available CAD models capture 3D shape but are often missing other low level cues, such as realistic object texture, pose, or background. In a detailed analysis, we use synthetic CAD-rendered images to probe the ability of DCNN to learn without these cues, with surprising findings. In particular, we show that when the DCNN is fine-tuned on the target detection task, it exhibits a large degree of invariance to missing low-level cues, but, when pretrained on generic ImageNet classification, it learns better when the low-level cues are simulated. We show that our synthetic DCNN training approach significantly outperforms previous methods on the PASCAL VOC2007 dataset when learning in the few-shot scenario and improves performance in a domain shift scenario on the Office benchmark.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

What Do Deep CNNs Learn About Objects?

Deep convolutional neural networks learn extremely powerful image representations, yet most of that power is hidden in the millions of deep-layer parameters. What exactly do these parameters represent? Recent work has started to analyse CNN representations, finding that, e.g., they are invariant to some 2D transformations Fischer et al. (2014), but are confused by particular types of image noise Nguyen et al. (2014). In this work, we delve deeper and ask: how invariant are CNNs to object-class variations caused by 3D shape, pose, and photorealism?

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access