BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Kajal Kumari

Kajal Kumari appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
physics.ins-detphysics.app-pheess.IVphysics.data-an

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Do we really need to recalibrate the CT system Configuration for every experiment?

Different technical and physical factors may affect the image quality reconstructed using a Computed Tomography system. We have developed and designed a 2D Gamma Computed Tomography set up to study the effect of some physical parameters. One must decide the number of detectors and set CT geometry parameters or configuration like the fan-beam angle and number of rotations. Usually, geometry parameters are determined based on the objects size. This study shows the influence of the density distribution of same-sized phantom or objects on CT geometry parameters. Due to limited space, industrial applications may not allow a CT system to move around the object (under investigation). On-spot customization of CT system configuration may be required according to similar situations. The same problem is experienced in medical science, material science, and many other fields in which the CT system is widely used for non-destructive imaging. The number of detectors in the scanning array is one major factor that optimizes a CT system. Of course, more detectors are desired for better resolution. Changing the number of detectors requires recalibration of CT geometry. A simulated work is presented to study the influence of the density distribution of same-sized objects and the number of detectors on CT system configuration. The same is verified experimentally also. A comparison between simulated and experimental results shows a good agreement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Effect of scattering and electronic noise upon selection of detectors for Gamma Computerized Tomography

Computed tomography (CT) has become a vital tool in a variety of fields as a result of technological developments and continual improvement. High-quality CT images are desirable for image interpretation and obtaining information from CT images. A variety of things influence the CT image quality. Various research groups have investigated and attempted to improve image quality by examining noise/error associated with CT geometry. This study aims to select detectors for CT, which yield the least amount of noise in projection data. Three distinct gamma-ray detectors that are routinely used in CT have been compared in terms of scattering and electrical noise. The sensitivity of Kanpur Theorem-1 to scattering noise is demonstrated in this work and used to quantify the relative level of scattering noise. The detector measures the signal multiple times, and the standard deviation of the signal is used to calculate the electronic noise. It is observed that IC CsI(Tl) scintillation detector produces low electronic noise and relative scattering noise as compared to conventional electronic detectors; NaI(Tl) and HPGe.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Noise analysis, error estimates, and Gamma Radiation Measurement for limited detector computerized tomography application

Computed Tomography is one of the efficient and vital modalities of non-destructive techniques (NDT). Various factors influence the CT reconstruction result, including limited projection data, detector electronics optimization, background noise, detection noise, discretized nature of projection data, and many more. Radiation hardening and other aging factors that affect the operational settings may require recalibration of electronics parameters. Two well-known exercises are utilized with the motivation to improve reliability and accuracy in inverse recovery. The first exercise brute-forces an optimal candidate from the set of calibration methods for minimum error in inverse recovery. The second exercise, Kanpur Theorem-1 (KT-1) examines if optimal calibration sets electronics to impart minimum noise. The mutual conformity between statistics-derived CLT and Riemann integral transform-based KT-1 is shown first time using gamma radiation measurement. The analysis shows that measurement data with normal distribution inflicts the least noise in inverse recovery.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access