Researcher profile

K. Svozil

K. Svozil contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint1995arXiv

Effective Quantum Observables

Thought experiments about the physical nature of set theoretical counterexamples to the axiom of choice motivate the investigation of peculiar constructions, e.g. an infinite dimensional Hilbert space with a modular quantum logic. Applying a concept due to BENIOFF, we identify the intrinsically effective Hamiltonians with those observables of quantum theory which may coexist with a failure of the axiom of choice. Here a self adjoint operator is intrinsically effective, iff the Schroedinger equation of its generated semigroup is soluble by means of eigenfunction series expansions.

preprint1994arXiv

Strong Determinism vs. Computability

Are minds subject to laws of physics? Are the laws of physics computable? Are conscious thought processes computable? Currently there is little agreement as to what are the right answers to these questions. Penrose goes one step further and asserts that: {\it a radical new theory is indeed needed, and I am suggesting, moreover, that this theory, when it is found, will be of an essentially non-computational character.} The aim of this paper is three fold: 1) to examine the incompatibility between the hypothesis of strong determinism and computability, 2) to give new examples of uncomputable physical laws, and 3) to discuss the relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem in refuting the claim that an algorithmic theory---like strong AI---can provide an adequate theory of mind. Finally, we question the adequacy of the theory of computation to discuss physical laws and thought processes.