Source author record

Jyothish Soman

Jyothish Soman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Utilising Graph Machine Learning within Drug Discovery and Development

Graph Machine Learning (GML) is receiving growing interest within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries for its ability to model biomolecular structures, the functional relationships between them, and integrate multi-omic datasets - amongst other data types. Herein, we present a multidisciplinary academic-industrial review of the topic within the context of drug discovery and development. After introducing key terms and modelling approaches, we move chronologically through the drug development pipeline to identify and summarise work incorporating: target identification, design of small molecules and biologics, and drug repurposing. Whilst the field is still emerging, key milestones including repurposed drugs entering in vivo studies, suggest graph machine learning will become a modelling framework of choice within biomedical machine learning.

preprint2020arXiv

Sparse Dynamic Distribution Decomposition: Efficient Integration of Trajectory and Snapshot Time Series Data

Dynamic Distribution Decomposition (DDD) was introduced in Taylor-King et. al. (PLOS Comp Biol, 2020) as a variation on Dynamic Mode Decomposition. In brief, by using basis functions over a continuous state space, DDD allows for the fitting of continuous-time Markov chains over these basis functions and as a result continuously maps between distributions. The number of parameters in DDD scales by the square of the number of basis functions; we reformulate the problem and restrict the method to compact basis functions which leads to the inference of sparse matrices only -- hence reducing the number of parameters. Finally, we demonstrate how DDD is suitable to integrate both trajectory time series (paired between subsequent time points) and snapshot time series (unpaired time points). Methods capable of integrating both scenarios are particularly relevant for the analysis of biomedical data, whereby studies observe population at fixed time points (snapshots) and individual patient journeys with repeated follow ups (trajectories).