Edge-disjoint double rays in infinite graphs: a Halin type result
We show that any graph that contains k edge-disjoint double rays for any k>0 contains also infinitely many edge-disjoint double rays. This was conjectured by Andreae in 1981.
Source author record
Julian Pott
Julian Pott appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Catalog footprint
What is connected
4works
1topics
4close collaborators
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
4 published item(s)
preprint2014arXiv
Linkages in Large Graphs of Bounded Tree-Width
We show that all sufficiently large (2k+3)-connected graphs of bounded tree-width are k-linked. Thomassen has conjectured that all sufficiently large (2k+2)-connected graphs are k-linked.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv
Orthogonality and minimality in the homology of locally finite graphs
Given a finite set $E$, a subset $D\sub E$ (viewed as a function $E\to \F_2$) is orthogonal to a given subspace $\FF$ of the $\F_2$-vector space of functions $E\to \F_2$ as soon as $D$ is orthogonal to every $\sub$-minimal element of $\FF$. This fails in general when $E$ is infinite. However, we prove the above statement for the six subspaces $\FF$ of the edge space of any 3-connected locally finite graph that are relevant to its homology: the topological, algebraic, and finite cycle and cut spaces. This solves a problem of [5]
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
Dual trees must share their ends
We extend to infinite graphs the matroidal characterization of finite graph duality, that two graphs are dual iff they have complementary spanning trees in some common edge set. The naive infinite analogue of this fails. The key in an infinite setting is that dual trees must share between them not only the edges of their host graphs but also their ends: the statement that a set of edges is acyclic and connects all the vertices in one of the graphs iff the remaining edges do the same in its dual will hold only once each of the two graphs' common ends has been assigned to one graph but not the other, and 'cycle' and 'connected' are interpreted topologically in the space containing the respective edges and precisely the ends thus assigned. This property characterizes graph duality: if, conversely, the spanning trees of two infinite graphs are complementary in this end-sharing way, the graphs form a dual pair.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access