BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Johannes Carmesin

Johannes Carmesin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.COmath.LOmath.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

28works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

28 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Canonical trees of tree-decompositions

We prove that every graph has a canonical tree of tree-decompositions that distinguishes all principal tangles (these include the ends and various kinds of large finite dense structures) efficiently. Here `trees of tree-decompositions' are a slightly weaker notion than `tree-decompositions' but much more well-behaved than `tree-like metric spaces'. This theorem is best possible in the sense that we give an example that `trees of tree-decompositions' cannot be strengthened to `tree-decompositions' in the above theorem. This implies results of Dunwoody and Krön as well as of Carmesin, Diestel, Hundertmark and Stein. Beyond that for locally finite graphs our result gives for each $k\in\mathbb N$ canonical tree-decompositions that distinguish all $k$-distinguishable ends efficiently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Reconstruction of infinite matroids from their 3-connected minors

We show that any infinite matroid can be reconstructed from the torsos of a tree-decomposition over its 2-separations, together with local information at the ends of the tree. We show that if the matroid is tame then this local information is simply a choice of whether circuits are permitted to use that end. The same is true if each torso is planar, with all gluing elements on a common face.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

$k$-Blocks: a connectivity invariant for graphs

A $k$-block in a graph $G$ is a maximal set of at least $k$ vertices no two of which can be separated in $G$ by fewer than $k$ other vertices. The block number $β(G)$ of $G$ is the largest integer $k$ such that $G$ has a $k$-block. We investigate how $β$ interacts with density invariants of graphs, such as their minimum or average degree. We further present algorithms that decide whether a graph has a $k$-block, or which find all its $k$-blocks. The connectivity invariant $β(G)$ has a dual width invariant, the block-width ${\rm bw}(G)$ of $G$. Our algorithms imply the duality theorem $β= {\rm bw}$: a graph has a block-decomposition of width and adhesion $< k$ if and only if it contains no $k$-block.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Canonical tree-decompositions of a graph that display its $k$-blocks

A $k$-block in a graph $G$ is a maximal set of at least $k$ vertices no two of which can be separated in $G$ by removing less than $k$ vertices. It is separable if there exists a tree-decomposition of adhesion less than $k$ of $G$ in which this $k$-block appears as a part. Carmesin, Diestel, Hamann, Hundertmark and Stein proved that every finite graph has a canonical tree-decomposition of adhesion less than $k$ that distinguishes all its $k$-blocks and tangles of order $k$. We construct such tree-decompositions with the additional property that every separable $k$-block is equal to the unique part in which it is contained. This proves a conjecture of Diestel.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Canonical tree-decompositions of finite graphs I. Existence and algorithms

We construct tree-decompositions of graphs that distinguish all their k-blocks and tangles of order k, for any fixed integer k. We describe a family of algorithms to construct such decompositions, seeking to maximize their diversity subject to the requirement that they commute with graph isomorphisms. In particular, all the decompositions constructed are invariant under the automorphisms of the graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Connectivity and tree structure in finite graphs

Considering systems of separations in a graph that separate every pair of a given set of vertex sets that are themselves not separated by these separations, we determine conditions under which such a separation system contains a nested subsystem that still separates those sets and is invariant under the automorphisms of the graph. As an application, we show that the $k$-blocks -- the maximal vertex sets that cannot be separated by at most $k$ vertices -- of a graph $G$ live in distinct parts of a suitable tree-decomposition of $G$ of adhesion at most $k$, whose decomposition tree is invariant under the automorphisms of $G$. This extends recent work of Dunwoody and Krön and, like theirs, generalizes a similar theorem of Tutte for $k=2$. Under mild additional assumptions, which are necessary, our decompositions can be combined into one overall tree-decomposition that distinguishes, for all $k$ simultaneously, all the $k$-blocks of a finite graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Topological infinite gammoids, and a new Menger-type theorem for infinite graphs

Answering a question of Diestel, we develop a topological notion of gammoids in infinite graphs which, unlike traditional infinite gammoids, always define a matroid. As our main tool, we prove for any infinite graph $G$ with vertex sets $A$ and $B$ that if every finite subset of $A$ is linked to $B$ by disjoint paths, then the whole of $A$ can be linked to the closure of $B$ by disjoint paths or rays in a natural topology on $G$ and its ends. This latter theorem re-proves and strengthens the infinite Menger theorem of Aharoni and Berger for `well-separated' sets $A$ and $B$. It also implies the topological Menger theorem of Diestel for locally finite graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Infinite graphic matroids Part I

An infinite matroid is graphic if all of its finite minors are graphic and the intersection of any circuit with any cocircuit is finite. We show that a matroid is graphic if and only if it can be represented by a graph-like topological space: that is, a graph-like space in the sense of Thomassen and Vella. This extends Tutte's characterization of finite graphic matroids. The representation we construct has many pleasant topological properties. Working in the representing space, we prove that any circuit in a 3-connected graphic matroid is countable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Infinite Matroids and Determinacy of Games

Solving a problem of Diestel and Pott, we construct a large class of infinite matroids. These can be used to provide counterexamples against the natural extension of the Well-quasi-ordering-Conjecture to infinite matroids and to show that the class of planar infinite matroids does not have a universal matroid. The existence of these matroids has a connection to Set Theory in that it corresponds to the Determinacy of certain games. To show that our construction gives matroids, we introduce a new very simple axiomatization of the class of countable tame matroids.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The ubiquity of Psi-matroids

Solving (for tame matroids) a problem of Aigner-Horev, Diestel and Postle, we prove that every tame matroid M can be reconstructed from its canonical tree decomposition into 3-connected pieces, circuits and cocircuits together with information about which ends of the decomposition tree are used by M . For every locally finite graph G, we show that every tame matroid whose circuits are topological circles of G and whose cocircuits are bonds of G is determined by the set Psi of ends it uses, that is, it is a Psi-matroid.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

An excluded minors method for infinite matroids

The notion of thin sums matroids was invented to extend the notion of representability to non-finitary matroids. A matroid is tame if every circuit-cocircuit intersection is finite. We prove that a tame matroid is a thin sums matroid over a finite field k if and only if all its finite minors are representable over k. We expect that the method we use to prove this will make it possible to lift many theorems about finite matroids representable over a finite field to theorems about tame thin sums matroids over these fields. We give three examples of this: various characterisations of binary tame matroids and of regular tame matroids, and unique representability of ternary tame matroids.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Infinite matroid union

We consider the problem of determining whether the union of two infinite matroids is a matroid. We introduce a superclass of the finitary matroids, the nearly finitary matroids, and prove that the union of two nearly finitary matroids is a nearly finitary matroid. On the other hand, we prove that the union of two arbitrary infinite matroids is not necessarily a matroid. Indeed, we show (under a weak additional assumption) that the nearly finitary matroids are essentially the largest class of matroids for which one can have a union theorem. We then extend the base packing theorem for finite matroids to finite families of co-finitary matroids. This, in turn, yields a matroidal proof for the tree-packing results for infinite graphs due to Diestel and Tutte.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Matroid intersection, base packing and base covering for infinite matroids

As part of the recent developments in infinite matroid theory, there have been a number of conjectures about how standard theorems of finite matroid theory might extend to the infinite setting. These include base packing, base covering, and matroid intersection and union. We show that several of these conjectures are equivalent, so that each gives a perspective on the same central problem of infinite matroid theory. For finite matroids, these equivalences give new and simpler proofs for the finite theorems corresponding to these conjectures. This new point of view also allows us to extend, and simplify the proofs of, some cases where these conjectures were known to be true.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Matroids with an infinite circuit-cocircuit intersection

We construct some matroids that have a circuit and a cocircuit with infinite intersection. This answers a question of Bruhn, Diestel, Kriesell, Pendavingh and Wollan. It further shows that the axiom system for matroids proposed by Dress does not axiomatize all infinite matroids. We show that one of the matroids we define is a thin sums matroid whose dual isn't a thin sums matroid.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On the intersection of infinite matroids

We show that the infinite matroid intersection conjecture of Nash-Williams implies the infinite Menger theorem proved recently by Aharoni and Berger. We prove that this conjecture is true whenever one matroid is nearly finitary and the second is the dual of a nearly finitary matroid, where the nearly finitary matroids form a superclass of the finitary matroids. In particular, this proves the infinite matroid intersection conjecture for finite-cycle matroids of 2-connected, locally finite graphs with only a finite number of vertex-disjoint rays.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A characterization of the locally finite networks admitting non-constant harmonic functions of finite energy

We characterize the locally finite networks admitting non-constant harmonic functions of finite energy. Our characterization unifies the necessary existence criteria of Thomassen and of Lyons and Peres with the sufficient criterion of Soardi. We also extend a necessary existence criterion for non-elusive non-constant harmonic functions of finite energy due to Georgakopoulos.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access