BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jules Jacobs

Jules Jacobs contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Programming LanguagesDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingFormal Languages and Automata TheoryLogic in Computer Sciencemath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Deciding Serializability in Network Systems

We present the SER modeling language for automatically verifying serializability of concurrent programs, i.e., whether every concurrent execution of the program is equivalent to some serial execution. SER programs are suitably restricted to make this problem decidable, while still allowing for an unbounded number of concurrent threads of execution, each potentially running for an unbounded number of steps. Building on prior theoretical results, we give the first automated end-to-end decision procedure that either proves serializability by producing a checkable certificate, or refutes it by producing a counterexample trace. We also present a network-system abstraction to which SER programs compile. Our decision procedure then reduces serializability in this setting to a Petri net reachability query. Furthermore, in order to scale, we curtail the search space via multiple optimizations, including Petri net slicing, semilinear-set compression, and Presburger-formula manipulation. We extensively evaluate our framework and show that, despite the theoretical hardness of the problem, it can successfully handle various models of real-world programs, including stateful firewalls, BGP routers, and more.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Paradoxes of Probabilistic Programming

Probabilistic programming languages allow programmers to write down conditional probability distributions that represent statistical and machine learning models as programs that use observe statements. These programs are run by accumulating likelihood at each observe statement, and using the likelihood to steer random choices and weigh results with inference algorithms such as importance sampling or MCMC. We argue that naive likelihood accumulation does not give desirable semantics and leads to paradoxes when an observe statement is used to condition on a measure-zero event, particularly when the observe statement is executed conditionally on random data. We show that the paradoxes disappear if we explicitly model measure-zero events as a limit of positive measure events, and that we can execute these type of probabilistic programs by accumulating infinitesimal probabilities rather than probability densities. Our extension improves probabilistic programming languages as an executable notation for probability distributions by making it more well-behaved and more expressive, by allowing the programmer to be explicit about which limit is intended when conditioning on an event of measure zero.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A magic determinant formula for symmetric polynomials of eigenvalues

Symmetric polynomials of the roots of a polynomial can be written as polynomials of the coefficients, and by applying this to the characteristic polynomial we can write a symmetric polynomial of the eigenvalues $a_{i}$ of an $n\times n$ matrix $A$ as a polynomial of the entries of the matrix. We give a magic formula for this: symbolically substitute $a\mapsto A$ in the symmetric polynomial and replace multiplication by $\det$. For instance, for a $2\times2$ matrix $A$ with eigenvalues $a_{1},a_{2}$, \begin{align*} a_1 a_2^2 +a_1^2 a_2 & =\det(A_1, A_2^2)+ \det(A_1^2, A_2) \end{align*} where $A_i^k$ is the $i$-th column of $A^k$. One may also take negative powers, allowing us to calculate: \begin{align*} a_1a_2^{-1}+a_1^{-1}a_{2} & =\det(A_{1},A_{2}^{-1})+\det(A_1^{-1},A_{2}) \end{align*} The magic method also works for multivariate symmetric polynomials of the eigenvalues of a set of commuting matrices, e.g. for $2\times2$ matrices $A$ and $B$ with eigenvalues $a_1,a_2$ and $b_{1},b_{2}$, \begin{align*} a_1 b_1 a_2^2 + a_1^2a_2b_2 & = \det(AB_{1},A_2^2) + \det(A_1^2,AB_2) \end{align*}

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access