Source author record

Jules Jacobs

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Programming Languages Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Formal Languages and Automata Theory Logic in Computer Science math.CO

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

5topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2026arXiv

Deciding Serializability in Network Systems

We present the SER modeling language for automatically verifying serializability of concurrent programs, i.e., whether every concurrent execution of the program is equivalent to some serial execution. SER programs are suitably restricted to make this problem decidable, while still allowing for an unbounded number of concurrent threads of execution, each potentially running for an unbounded number of steps. Building on prior theoretical results, we give the first automated end-to-end decision procedure that either proves serializability by producing a checkable certificate, or refutes it by producing a counterexample trace. We also present a network-system abstraction to which SER programs compile. Our decision procedure then reduces serializability in this setting to a Petri net reachability query. Furthermore, in order to scale, we curtail the search space via multiple optimizations, including Petri net slicing, semilinear-set compression, and Presburger-formula manipulation. We extensively evaluate our framework and show that, despite the theoretical hardness of the problem, it can successfully handle various models of real-world programs, including stateful firewalls, BGP routers, and more.

preprint2021arXiv

Paradoxes of Probabilistic Programming

Probabilistic programming languages allow programmers to write down conditional probability distributions that represent statistical and machine learning models as programs that use observe statements. These programs are run by accumulating likelihood at each observe statement, and using the likelihood to steer random choices and weigh results with inference algorithms such as importance sampling or MCMC. We argue that naive likelihood accumulation does not give desirable semantics and leads to paradoxes when an observe statement is used to condition on a measure-zero event, particularly when the observe statement is executed conditionally on random data. We show that the paradoxes disappear if we explicitly model measure-zero events as a limit of positive measure events, and that we can execute these type of probabilistic programs by accumulating infinitesimal probabilities rather than probability densities. Our extension improves probabilistic programming languages as an executable notation for probability distributions by making it more well-behaved and more expressive, by allowing the programmer to be explicit about which limit is intended when conditioning on an event of measure zero.

preprint2020arXiv

A magic determinant formula for symmetric polynomials of eigenvalues

Symmetric polynomials of the roots of a polynomial can be written as polynomials of the coefficients, and by applying this to the characteristic polynomial we can write a symmetric polynomial of the eigenvalues $a_{i}$ of an $n\times n$ matrix $A$ as a polynomial of the entries of the matrix. We give a magic formula for this: symbolically substitute $a\mapsto A$ in the symmetric polynomial and replace multiplication by $\det$ . For instance, for a $2\times2$ matrix $A$ with eigenvalues $a_{1},a_{2}$ , \begin{align*} a_1 a_2^2 +a_1^2 a_2 & =\det(A_1, A_2^2)+ \det(A_1^2, A_2) \end{align*} where $A_i^k$ is the $i$ -th column of $A^k$ . One may also take negative powers, allowing us to calculate: \begin{align*} a_1a_2^{-1}+a_1^{-1}a_{2} & =\det(A_{1},A_{2}^{-1})+\det(A_1^{-1},A_{2}) \end{align*} The magic method also works for multivariate symmetric polynomials of the eigenvalues of a set of commuting matrices, e.g. for $2\times2$ matrices $A$ and $B$ with eigenvalues $a_1,a_2$ and $b_{1},b_{2}$ , \begin{align*} a_1 b_1 a_2^2 + a_1^2a_2b_2 & = \det(AB_{1},A_2^2) + \det(A_1^2,AB_2) \end{align*}

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.