BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jules Hedges

Jules Hedges appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game TheoryLogic in Computer Sciencemath.CTProgramming Languagesmath.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Compositional modelling of network games

The analysis of games played on graph-like structures is of increasing importance due to the prevalence of social networks, both virtual and physical, in our daily life. As well as being relevant in computer science, mathematical analysis and computer simulations of such distributed games are vital methodologies in economics, politics and epidemiology, amongst other fields. Our contribution is to give compositional semantics of a family of such games as a well-behaved mapping, a strict monoidal functor, from a category of open graphs (syntax) to a category of open games (semantics). As well as introducing the theoretical framework, we identify some applications of compositionality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The game semantics of game theory

We use a reformulation of compositional game theory to reunite game theory with game semantics, by viewing an open game as the System and its choice of contexts as the Environment. Specifically, the system is jointly controlled by $n \geq 0$ noncooperative players, each independently optimising a real-valued payoff. The goal of the system is to play a Nash equilibrium, and the goal of the environment is to prevent it. The key to this is the realisation that lenses (from functional programming) form a dialectica category, which have an existing game-semantic interpretation. In the second half of this paper, we apply these ideas to build a compact closed category of `computable open games' by replacing the underlying dialectica category with a wave-style geometry of interaction category, specifically the Int-construction applied to the cartesian monoidal category of directed-complete partial orders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Compositionality and String Diagrams for Game Theory

We introduce string diagrams as a formal mathematical, graphical language to represent, compose, program and reason about games. The language is well established in quantum physics, quantum computing and quantum linguistic with the semantics given by category theory. We apply this language to the game theoretical setting and show examples how to use it for some economic games where we highlight the compositional nature of our higher-order game theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Higher-Order Decision Theory

Classical decision theory models behaviour in terms of utility maximisation where utilities represent rational preference relations over outcomes. However, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations suggest that we need to go beyond this framework. We propose to represent goals by higher-order functions or operators that take other functions as arguments where the max and argmax operators are special cases. Our higher-order functions take a context function as their argument where a context represents a process from actions to outcomes. By that we can define goals being dependent on the actions and the process in addition to outcomes only. This formulation generalises outcome based preferences to context-dependent goals. We show how to uniformly represent within our higher-order framework classical utility maximisation but also various other extensions that have been debated in economics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Higher-Order Game Theory

In applied game theory the motivation of players is a key element. It is encoded in the payoffs of the game form and often based on utility functions. But there are cases were formal descriptions in the form of a utility function do not exist. In this paper we introduce a representation of games where players' goals are modeled based on so-called higher-order functions. Our representation provides a general and powerful way to mathematically summarize players' intentions. In our framework utility functions as well as preference relations are special cases to describe players' goals. We show that in higher-order functions formal descriptions of players may still exist where utility functions do not using a classical example, a variant of Keynes' beauty contest. We also show that equilibrium conditions based on Nash can be easily adapted to our framework. Lastly, this framework serves as a stepping stone to powerful tools from computer science that can be usefully applied to economic game theory in the future such as computational and computability aspects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

String diagrams for game theory

This paper presents a monoidal category whose morphisms are games (in the sense of game theory, not game semantics) and an associated diagrammatic language. The two basic operations of a monoidal category, namely categorical composition and tensor product, correspond roughly to sequential and simultaneous composition of games. This leads to a compositional theory in which we can reason about properties of games in terms of corresponding properties of the component parts. In particular, we give a definition of Nash equilibrium which is recursive on the causal structure of the game. The key technical idea in this paper is the use of continuation passing style for reasoning about the future consequences of players' choices, closely based on applications of selection functions in game theory. Additionally, the clean categorical foundation gives many opportunities for generalisation, for example to learning agents.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The selection monad as a CPS transformation

A computation in the continuation monad returns a final result given a continuation, ie. it is a function with type $(X \to R) \to R$. If we instead return the intermediate result at $X$ then our computation is called a selection function. Selection functions appear in diverse areas of mathematics and computer science (especially game theory, proof theory and topology) but the existing literature does not heavily emphasise the fact that the selection monad is a CPS translation. In particular it has so far gone unnoticed that the selection monad has a call/cc-like operator with interesting similarities and differences to the usual call/cc, which we explore experimentally using Haskell. Selection functions can be used whenever we find the intermediate result more interesting than the final result. For example a SAT solver computes an assignment to a boolean function, and then its continuation decides whether it is a satisfying assignment, and we find the assignment itself more interesting than the fact that it is or is not satisfying. In game theory we find the move chosen by a player more interesting than the outcome that results from that move. The author and collaborators are developing a theory of games in which selection functions are viewed as generalised notions of rationality, used to model players. By realising that strategic contexts in game theory are examples of continuations we can see that classical game theory narrowly misses being in CPS, and that a small change of viewpoint yields a theory of games that is better behaved, and especially more compositional.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Higher-order Framework for Decision Problems and Games

We introduce a new unified framework for modelling both decision problems and finite games based on quantifiers and selection functions. We show that the canonical utility maximisation is one special case of a quantifier and that our more abstract framework provides several additional degrees of freedom in modelling. In particular, incomplete preferences, non-maximising heuristics, and context-dependent motives can be taken into account when describing an agent's goal. We introduce a suitable generalisation of Nash equilibrium for games in terms of quantifiers and selection functions. Moreover, we introduce a refinement of Nash that captures context-dependency of goals. Modelling in our framework is compositional as the parts of the game are modular and can be easily exchanged. We provide an extended example where we illustrate concepts and highlight the benefits of our alternative modelling approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Dialectica models of additive-free linear logic

This paper presents a construction which transforms categorical models of additive-free propositional linear logic, closely based on de Paiva's dialectica categories and Oliva's functional interpretations of classical linear logic. The construction is defined using dependent type theory, which proves to be a useful tool for reasoning about dialectica categories. Abstractly, we have a closure operator on the class of models: it preserves soundness and completeness and has a monad-like structure. When applied to categories of games we obtain `games with bidding', which are hybrids of dialectica and game models, and we prove completeness theorems for two specific such models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Monad Transformers for Backtracking Search

This paper extends Escardo and Oliva's selection monad to the selection monad transformer, a general monadic framework for expressing backtracking search algorithms in Haskell. The use of the closely related continuation monad transformer for similar purposes is also discussed, including an implementation of a DPLL-like SAT solver with no explicit recursion. Continuing a line of work exploring connections between selection functions and game theory, we use the selection monad transformer with the nondeterminism monad to obtain an intuitive notion of backward induction for a certain class of nondeterministic games.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access