BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Juho Lauri

Juho Lauri appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Discrete Mathematicsmath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityArtificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageDatabasesDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingInformation RetrievalSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Finding path motifs in large temporal graphs using algebraic fingerprints

We study a family of pattern-detection problems in vertex-colored temporal graphs. In particular, given a vertex-colored temporal graph and a multiset of colors as a query, we search for temporal paths in the graph that contain the colors specified in the query. These types of problems have several applications, for example in recommending tours for tourists or detecting abnormal behavior in a network of financial transactions. For the family of pattern-detection problems we consider, we establish complexity results and design an algebraic-algorithmic framework based on constrained multilinear sieving. We demonstrate that our solution scales to massive graphs with up to a billion edges for a multiset query with five colors and up to hundred million edges for a multiset query with ten colors, despite the problems being NP-hard. Our implementation, which is publicly available, exhibits practical edge-linear scalability and is highly optimized. For instance, in a real-world graph dataset with more than six million edges and a multiset query with ten colors, we can extract an optimum solution in less than eight minutes on a Haswell desktop with four cores.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning fine-grained search space pruning and heuristics for combinatorial optimization

Combinatorial optimization problems arise in a wide range of applications from diverse domains. Many of these problems are NP-hard and designing efficient heuristics for them requires considerable time and experimentation. On the other hand, the number of optimization problems in the industry continues to grow. In recent years, machine learning techniques have been explored to address this gap. We propose a framework for leveraging machine learning techniques to scale-up exact combinatorial optimization algorithms. In contrast to the existing approaches based on deep-learning, reinforcement learning and restricted Boltzmann machines that attempt to directly learn the output of the optimization problem from its input (with limited success), our framework learns the relatively simpler task of pruning the elements in order to reduce the size of the problem instances. In addition, our framework uses only interpretable learning models based on intuitive features and thus the learning process provides deeper insights into the optimization problem and the instance class, that can be used for designing better heuristics. For the classical maximum clique enumeration problem, we show that our framework can prune a large fraction of the input graph (around 99 % of nodes in case of sparse graphs) and still detect almost all of the maximum cliques. This results in several fold speedups of state-of-the-art algorithms. Furthermore, the model used in our framework highlights that the chi-squared value of neighborhood degree has a statistically significant correlation with the presence of a node in a maximum clique, particularly in dense graphs which constitute a significant challenge for modern solvers. We leverage this insight to design a novel heuristic for this problem outperforming the state-of-the-art. Our heuristic is also of independent interest for maximum clique detection and enumeration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Perfect Italian domination on planar and regular graphs

A perfect Italian dominating function of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $f : V \to \{0,1,2\}$ such that for every vertex $f(v) = 0$, it holds that $\sum_{u \in N(v)} f(u) = 2$, i.e., the weight of the labels assigned by $f$ to the neighbors of $v$ is exactly two. The weight of a perfect Italian function is the sum of the weights of the vertices. The perfect Italian domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ^p_I(G)$, is the minimum weight of any perfect Italian dominating function of $G$. While introducing the parameter, Haynes and Henning (Discrete Appl. Math. (2019), 164--177) also proposed the problem of determining the best possible constants $c_\mathcal{G}$ such that $γ^p_I(G) \leq c_\mathcal{G} \times n$ for all graphs of order $n$ when $G$ is in a particular class $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs. They proved that $c_\mathcal{G} = 1$ when $\mathcal{G}$ is the class of bipartite graphs, and raised the question for planar graphs and regular graphs. We settle their question precisely for planar graphs by proving that $c_\mathcal{G} = 1$ and for cubic graphs by proving that $c_\mathcal{G} = 2/3$. For split graphs, we also show that $c_\mathcal{G} = 1$. In addition, we characterize the graphs $G$ with $γ^p_I(G)$ equal to 2 and 3 and determine the exact value of the parameter for several simple structured graphs. We conclude by proving that it is NP-complete to decide whether a given bipartite planar graph admits a perfect Italian dominating function of weight $k$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Towards Quantifying the Distance between Opinions

Increasingly, critical decisions in public policy, governance, and business strategy rely on a deeper understanding of the needs and opinions of constituent members (e.g. citizens, shareholders). While it has become easier to collect a large number of opinions on a topic, there is a necessity for automated tools to help navigate the space of opinions. In such contexts understanding and quantifying the similarity between opinions is key. We find that measures based solely on text similarity or on overall sentiment often fail to effectively capture the distance between opinions. Thus, we propose a new distance measure for capturing the similarity between opinions that leverages the nuanced observation -- similar opinions express similar sentiment polarity on specific relevant entities-of-interest. Specifically, in an unsupervised setting, our distance measure achieves significantly better Adjusted Rand Index scores (up to 56x) and Silhouette coefficients (up to 21x) compared to existing approaches. Similarly, in a supervised setting, our opinion distance measure achieves considerably better accuracy (up to 20% increase) compared to extant approaches that rely on text similarity, stance similarity, and sentiment similarity

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Upper Bounding Rainbow Connection Number by Forest Number

A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are colored the same, and the graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path between each pair of its vertices. The minimum number of colors needed to rainbow-connect a graph $G$ is the rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by $\text{rc}(G)$. A simple way to rainbow-connect a graph $G$ is to color the edges of a spanning tree with distinct colors and then re-use any of these colors to color the remaining edges of $G$. This proves that $\text{rc}(G) \le |V(G)|-1$. We ask whether there is a stronger connection between tree-like structures and rainbow coloring than that is implied by the above trivial argument. For instance, is it possible to find an upper bound of $t(G) -1$ for $\text{rc}(G)$, where $t(G)$ is the number of vertices in the largest induced tree of $G$? The answer turns out to be negative, as there are counter-examples that show that even $c\cdot t(G)$ is not an upper bound for $\text{rc}(G))$ for any given constant $c$. In this work we show that if we consider the forest number $f(G)$, the number of vertices in a maximum induced forest of $G$, instead of $t(G)$, then surprisingly we do get an upper bound. More specifically, we prove that $\text{rc}(G) \leq f(G) + 2$. Our result indicates a stronger connection between rainbow connection and tree-like structures than that was suggested by the simple spanning tree based upper bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Complexity of Rainbow Vertex Connectivity Problems for Restricted Graph Classes

A path in a vertex-colored graph $G$ is \emph{vertex rainbow} if all of its internal vertices have a distinct color. The graph $G$ is said to be \emph{rainbow vertex connected} if there is a vertex rainbow path between every pair of its vertices. Similarly, the graph $G$ is \emph{strongly rainbow vertex connected} if there is a shortest path which is vertex rainbow between every pair of its vertices. We consider the complexity of deciding if a given vertex-colored graph is rainbow or strongly rainbow vertex connected. We call these problems \probRvc and \probSrvc, respectively. We prove both problems remain NP-complete on very restricted graph classes including bipartite planar graphs of maximum degree 3, interval graphs, and $k$-regular graphs for $k \geq 3$. We settle precisely the complexity of both problems from the viewpoint of two width parameters: pathwidth and tree-depth. More precisely, we show both problems remain NP-complete for bounded pathwidth graphs, while being fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by tree-depth. Moreover, we show both problems are solvable in polynomial time for block graphs, while \probSrvc is tractable for cactus graphs and split graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Further Hardness Results on Rainbow and Strong Rainbow Connectivity

A path in an edge-colored graph is \textit{rainbow} if no two edges of it are colored the same. The graph is said to be \textit{rainbow connected} if there is a rainbow path between every pair of vertices. If there is a rainbow shortest path between every pair of vertices, the graph is \textit{strong rainbow connected}. We consider the complexity of the problem of deciding if a given edge-colored graph is rainbow or strong rainbow connected. These problems are called \textsc{Rainbow connectivity} and \textsc{Strong rainbow connectivity}, respectively. We prove both problems remain $\NP$\hyp{}complete on interval outerplanar graphs and $k$-regular graphs for $k \geq 3$. Previously, no graph class was known where the complexity of the two problems would differ. We show that for block graphs, which form a subclass of chordal graphs, \textsc{Rainbow connectivity} is $\NP$\hyp{}complete while \textsc{Strong rainbow connectivity} is in $¶$. We conclude by considering some tractable special cases, and show for instance that both problems are in $\XP$ when parameterized by tree-depth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the fine-grained complexity of rainbow coloring

The Rainbow k-Coloring problem asks whether the edges of a given graph can be colored in $k$ colors so that every pair of vertices is connected by a rainbow path, i.e., a path with all edges of different colors. Our main result states that for any $k\ge 2$, there is no algorithm for Rainbow k-Coloring running in time $2^{o(n^{3/2})}$, unless ETH fails. Motivated by this negative result we consider two parameterized variants of the problem. In Subset Rainbow k-Coloring problem, introduced by Chakraborty et al. [STACS 2009, J. Comb. Opt. 2009], we are additionally given a set $S$ of pairs of vertices and we ask if there is a coloring in which all the pairs in $S$ are connected by rainbow paths. We show that Subset Rainbow k-Coloring is FPT when parameterized by $|S|$. We also study Maximum Rainbow k-Coloring problem, where we are additionally given an integer $q$ and we ask if there is a coloring in which at least $q$ anti-edges are connected by rainbow paths. We show that the problem is FPT when parameterized by $q$ and has a kernel of size $O(q)$ for every $k\ge 2$ (thus proving that the problem is FPT), extending the result of Ananth et al. [FSTTCS 2011].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The square of the 9-hypercube is 14-colorable

The $n$-hypercube, denoted by $Q_n$, has a vertex for each bit string of length $n$ with two vertices adjacent whenever their Hamming distance is one. The minimum number of colors needed to color $Q_n$ such that no two vertices at a distance at most $k$ receive the same color is denoted by $χ_{\bar{k}}(n)$. Equivalently, $χ_{\bar{k}}(n)$ denotes the minimum number of binary codes with minimum distance at least $k+1$ required to partition the $n$-dimensional Hamming space. Using a computer search, we improve upon the known upper bound for $n=9$ by showing that $13 \leq χ_{\bar{2}}(9) \leq 14$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the Complexity of Rainbow Coloring Problems

An edge-colored graph $G$ is said to be rainbow connected if between each pair of vertices there exists a path which uses each color at most once. The rainbow connection number, denoted by $rc(G)$, is the minimum number of colors needed to make $G$ rainbow connected. Along with its variants, which consider vertex colorings and/or so-called strong colorings, the rainbow connection number has been studied from both the algorithmic and graph-theoretic points of view. In this paper we present a range of new results on the computational complexity of computing the four major variants of the rainbow connection number. In particular, we prove that the \textsc{Strong Rainbow Vertex Coloring} problem is $NP$-complete even on graphs of diameter $3$. We show that when the number of colors is fixed, then all of the considered problems can be solved in linear time on graphs of bounded treewidth. Moreover, we provide a linear-time algorithm which decides whether it is possible to obtain a rainbow coloring by saving a fixed number of colors from a trivial upper bound. Finally, we give a linear-time algorithm for computing the exact rainbow connection numbers for three variants of the problem on graphs of bounded vertex cover number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access