BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Juergen Branke

Juergen Branke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.OCNeural and Evolutionary ComputingArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Bayesian Optimization with Preference Exploration using a Monotonic Neural Network Ensemble

Many real-world black-box optimization problems have multiple conflicting objectives. Rather than attempting to approximate the entire set of Pareto-optimal solutions, interactive preference learning allows to focus the search on the most relevant subset. However, few previous studies have exploited the fact that utility functions are usually monotonic. In this paper, we address the Bayesian Optimization with Preference Exploration (BOPE) problem and propose using a neural network ensemble as a utility surrogate model. This approach naturally integrates monotonicity and supports pairwise comparison data. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches and exhibits robustness to noise in utility evaluations. An ablation study highlights the critical role of monotonicity in enhancing performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tackling Neural Architecture Search With Quality Diversity Optimization

Neural architecture search (NAS) has been studied extensively and has grown to become a research field with substantial impact. While classical single-objective NAS searches for the architecture with the best performance, multi-objective NAS considers multiple objectives that should be optimized simultaneously, e.g., minimizing resource usage along the validation error. Although considerable progress has been made in the field of multi-objective NAS, we argue that there is some discrepancy between the actual optimization problem of practical interest and the optimization problem that multi-objective NAS tries to solve. We resolve this discrepancy by formulating the multi-objective NAS problem as a quality diversity optimization (QDO) problem and introduce three quality diversity NAS optimizers (two of them belonging to the group of multifidelity optimizers), which search for high-performing yet diverse architectures that are optimal for application-specific niches, e.g., hardware constraints. By comparing these optimizers to their multi-objective counterparts, we demonstrate that quality diversity NAS in general outperforms multi-objective NAS with respect to quality of solutions and efficiency. We further show how applications and future NAS research can thrive on QDO.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Reproducibility in Evolutionary Computation

Experimental studies are prevalent in Evolutionary Computation (EC), and concerns about the reproducibility and replicability of such studies have increased in recent times, reflecting similar concerns in other scientific fields. In this article, we discuss, within the context of EC, the different types of reproducibility and suggest a classification that refines the badge system of the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) adopted by ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization (https://dlnext.acm.org/journal/telo). We identify cultural and technical obstacles to reproducibility in the EC field. Finally, we provide guidelines and suggest tools that may help to overcome some of these reproducibility obstacles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Bayesian Optimisation vs. Input Uncertainty Reduction

Simulators often require calibration inputs estimated from real world data and the quality of the estimate can significantly affect simulation output. Particularly when performing simulation optimisation to find an optimal solution, the uncertainty in the inputs significantly affects the quality of the found solution. One remedy is to search for the solution that has the best performance on average over the uncertain range of inputs yielding an optimal compromise solution. We consider the more general setting where a user may choose between either running simulations or instead collecting real world data. A user may choose an input and a solution and observe the simulation output, or instead query an external data source improving the input estimate enabling the search for a more focused, less compromised solution. We explicitly examine the trade-off between simulation and real data collection in order to find the optimal solution of the simulator with the true inputs. Using a value of information procedure, we propose a novel unified simulation optimisation procedure called Bayesian Information Collection and Optimisation (BICO) that, in each iteration, automatically determines which of the two actions (running simulations or data collection) is more beneficial. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is able to automatically determine an appropriate balance between optimisation and data collection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

BOP-Elites, a Bayesian Optimisation algorithm for Quality-Diversity search

Quality Diversity (QD) algorithms such as MAP-Elites are a class of optimisation techniques that attempt to find a set of high-performing points from an objective function while enforcing behavioural diversity of the points over one or more interpretable, user chosen, feature functions. In this paper we propose the Bayesian Optimisation of Elites (BOP-Elites) algorithm that uses techniques from Bayesian Optimisation to explicitly model both quality and diversity with Gaussian Processes. By considering user defined regions of the feature space as 'niches' our task is to find the optimal solution in each niche. We propose a novel acquisition function to intelligently choose new points that provide the highest expected improvement to the ensemble problem of identifying the best solution in every niche. In this way each function evaluation enriches our modelling and provides insight to the whole problem, naturally balancing exploration and exploitation of the search space. The resulting algorithm is very effective in identifying the parts of the search space that belong to a niche in feature space, and finding the optimal solution in each niche. It is also significantly more sample efficient than simpler benchmark approaches. BOP-Elites goes further than existing QD algorithms by quantifying the uncertainty around our predictions and offering additional illumination of the search space through surrogate models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Exploiting Transitivity for Top-k Selection with Score-Based Dueling Bandits

We consider the problem of top-k subset selection in Dueling Bandit problems with score information. Real-world pairwise ranking problems often exhibit a high degree of transitivity and prior work has suggested sampling methods that exploit such transitivity through the use of parametric preference models like the Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) and Thurstone models. To date, this work has focused on cases where sample outcomes are win/loss binary responses. We extend this to selection problems where sampling results contain quantitative information by proposing a Thurstonian style model and adapting the Pairwise Optimal Computing Budget Allocation for subset selection (POCBAm) sampling method to exploit this model for efficient sample selection. We compare the empirical performance against standard POCBAm and other competing algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access