BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Juan Viu-Sos

Juan Viu-Sos appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.NTmath.AGmath.DSmath.GRmath.GT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the equality of periods of Kontsevich-Zagier

Effective periods were defined by Kontsevich and Zagier as complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are values of absolutely convergent integrals of $\mathbb{Q}$-rational functions over $\mathbb{Q}$-semi-algebraic domains in $\mathbb{R}^d$. The Kontsevich-Zagier period conjecture states that any two different integral expressions of a period are related by a finite sequence of transformations only using three rules respecting the rationality of functions and domains: integral addition by integrands or domains, change of variables and Stokes' formula. In this paper, we introduce two geometric interpretations of this conjecture, seen as a generalization of Hilbert's third problem involving either compact semi-algebraic sets or rational polyhedra equipped with piece-wise algebraic forms. Based on known partial results for analogous Hilbert's third problems, we study possible geometric schemes to prove this conjecture and their potential obstructions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A semi-canonical reduction for periods of Kontsevich-Zagier

The ${\overline{\mathbb Q}}$-algebra of periods was introduced by Kontsevich and Zagier as complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are values of absolutely convergent integrals of ${\mathbb Q}$-rational functions over ${\mathbb Q}$-semi-algebraic domains in ${\mathbb R}^d$. The Kontsevich-Zagier period conjecture affirms that any two different integral expressions of a given period are related by a finite sequence of transformations only using three rules respecting the rationality of the functions and domains: additions of integrals by integrands or domains, change of variables and Stokes formula. In this paper, we prove that every non-zero real period can be represented as the volume of a compact ${\overline{\mathbb Q}}\cap{\mathbb R}$-semi-algebraic set, obtained from any integral representation by an effective algorithm satisfying the rules allowed by the Kontsevich-Zagier period conjecture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Ineffectiveness of homotopical invariants on Nakanishi's 4-move conjecture

A $4$-move is a local operation for links consisting in replacing two parallel arcs by four half twists. At the present time, it is not known if this induces an unkotting operation for knots. Studying the Dabkowski-Sahi invariant, we prove that any invariant of knots based on the fundamental group $π_1(S^3\setminus K)$ and preserved by $4$-moves is constant among the isotopy classes of knots.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Motivic Zeta Functions on $\mathds{Q}$-Gorenstein Varieties

We study motivic zeta functions for $\mathds{Q}$-divisors in a $\mathds{Q}$-Gorenstein variety. By using a toric partial resolution of singularities we reduce this study to the local case of two normal crossing divisors where the ambient space is an abelian quotient singularity. For the latter we provide a closed formula which is worked out directly on the quotient singular variety. As a first application we provide a family of surface singularities where the use of weighted blow-ups reduces the set of candidate poles drastically. We also present an example of a quotient singularity under the action of a nonabelian group, from which we compute some invariants of motivic nature after constructing a $\mathds{Q}$-resolution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Combinatorics of line arrangements and dynamics of polynomial vector fields

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a real line arrangement and $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A})$ the module of $\mathcal{A}$--derivations. First, we give a dynamical interpretation of $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A})$ as the set of polynomial vector fields which posses $\mathcal{A}$ as invariant set. We characterize polynomial vector fields having an infinite number of invariant lines. Then we prove that the minimal degree of polynomial vector fields fixing only a finite set of lines in $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A})$ is not determined by the combinatorics of $\mathcal{A}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Combinatorics of line arrangements and polynomial vector fields

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a real line arrangement and $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A})$ the module of $\mathcal{A}$-derivations view as the set of polynomial vector fields which possess $\mathcal{A}$ as an invariant set. We first characterize polynomial vector fields having an infinite number of invariant lines. Then we prove that the minimal degree of polynomial vector fields fixing only a finite set of lines in $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A})$ is not determined by the combinatorics of $\mathcal{A}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access