BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Juan M. Cardenas

Juan M. Cardenas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical AnalysisMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A high order unfitted hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for linear elasticity

This work analyzes a high order hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) method for the linear elasticity problem in a domain not necessarily polyhedral. The domain is approximated by a polyhedral computational domain where the HDG solution can be computed. The introduction of the rotation as one of the unknowns allows us to use the gradient of the displacements to obtain an explicit representation of the boundary data in the computational domain. The boundary data is transferred from the true boundary to the computational boundary by line integrals, where the integrand depends on the Cauchy stress tensor and the rotation. Under closeness assumptions between the computational and true boundaries, the scheme is shown to be well-posed and optimal error estimates are provided even in the nearly incompressible. Numerical experiments in two-dimensions are presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

CAS4DL: Christoffel Adaptive Sampling for function approximation via Deep Learning

The problem of approximating smooth, multivariate functions from sample points arises in many applications in scientific computing, e.g., in computational Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) for science and engineering. In these applications, the target function may represent a desired quantity of interest of a parameterized Partial Differential Equation (PDE). Due to the large cost of solving such problems, where each sample is computed by solving a PDE, sample efficiency is a key concerning these applications. Recently, there has been increasing focus on the use of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) and Deep Learning (DL) for learning such functions from data. In this work, we propose an adaptive sampling strategy, CAS4DL (Christoffel Adaptive Sampling for Deep Learning) to increase the sample efficiency of DL for multivariate function approximation. Our novel approach is based on interpreting the second to last layer of a DNN as a dictionary of functions defined by the nodes on that layer. With this viewpoint, we then define an adaptive sampling strategy motivated by adaptive sampling schemes recently proposed for linear approximation schemes, wherein samples are drawn randomly with respect to the Christoffel function of the subspace spanned by this dictionary. We present numerical experiments comparing CAS4DL with standard Monte Carlo (MC) sampling. Our results demonstrate that CAS4DL often yields substantial savings in the number of samples required to achieve a given accuracy, particularly in the case of smooth activation functions, and it shows a better stability in comparison to MC. These results therefore are a promising step towards fully adapting DL towards scientific computing applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards optimal sampling for learning sparse approximation in high dimensions

In this chapter, we discuss recent work on learning sparse approximations to high-dimensional functions on data, where the target functions may be scalar-, vector- or even Hilbert space-valued. Our main objective is to study how the sampling strategy affects the sample complexity -- that is, the number of samples that suffice for accurate and stable recovery -- and to use this insight to obtain optimal or near-optimal sampling procedures. We consider two settings. First, when a target sparse representation is known, in which case we present a near-complete answer based on drawing independent random samples from carefully-designed probability measures. Second, we consider the more challenging scenario when such representation is unknown. In this case, while not giving a full answer, we describe a general construction of sampling measures that improves over standard Monte Carlo sampling. We present examples using algebraic and trigonometric polynomials, and for the former, we also introduce a new procedure for function approximation on irregular (i.e., nontensorial) domains. The effectiveness of this procedure is shown through numerical examples. Finally, we discuss a number of structured sparsity models, and how they may lead to better approximations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access