BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joshua Meyers

Joshua Meyers contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.IMDatabasesMachine Learningmath.CT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fast Left Kan Extensions Using The Chase

We show how computation of left Kan extensions can be reduced to computation of free models of cartesian (finite-limit) theories. We discuss how the standard and parallel chase compute weakly free models of regular theories and free models of cartesian theories, and compare the concept of "free model" with a similar concept from database theory known as "universal model". We prove that, as algorithms for computing finite free models of cartesian theories, the standard and parallel chase are complete under fairness assumptions. Finally, we describe an optimized implementation of the parallel chase specialized to left Kan extensions that achieves an order of magnitude improvement in our performance benchmarks compared to the next fastest left Kan extension algorithm we are aware of.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimising LSST Observing Strategy for Weak Lensing Systematics

The LSST survey will provide unprecedented statistical power for measurements of dark energy. Consequently, controlling systematic uncertainties is becoming more important than ever. The LSST observing strategy will affect the statistical uncertainty and systematics control for many science cases; here, we focus on weak lensing systematics. The fact that the LSST observing strategy involves hundreds of visits to the same sky area provides new opportunities for systematics mitigation. We explore these opportunities by testing how different dithering strategies (pointing offsets and rotational angle of the camera in different exposures) affect additive weak lensing shear systematics on a baseline operational simulation, using the $ρ-$statistics formalism. Some dithering strategies improve systematics control at the end of the survey by a factor of up to $\sim 3-4$ better than others. We find that a random translational dithering strategy, applied with random rotational dithering at every filter change, is the most effective of those strategies tested in this work at averaging down systematics. Adopting this dithering algorithm, we explore the effect of varying the area of the survey footprint, exposure time, number of exposures in a visit, and exposure to the Galactic plane. We find that any change that increases the average number of exposures (in filters relevant to weak lensing) reduces the additive shear systematics. Some ways to achieve this increase may not be favorable for the weak lensing statistical constraining power or for other probes, and we explore the relative trade-offs between these options given constraints on the overall survey parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Synthesizing Property & Casualty Ratemaking Datasets using Generative Adversarial Networks

Due to confidentiality issues, it can be difficult to access or share interesting datasets for methodological development in actuarial science, or other fields where personal data are important. We show how to design three different types of generative adversarial networks (GANs) that can build a synthetic insurance dataset from a confidential original dataset. The goal is to obtain synthetic data that no longer contains sensitive information but still has the same structure as the original dataset and retains the multivariate relationships. In order to adequately model the specific characteristics of insurance data, we use GAN architectures adapted for multi-categorical data: a Wassertein GAN with gradient penalty (MC-WGAN-GP), a conditional tabular GAN (CTGAN) and a Mixed Numerical and Categorical Differentially Private GAN (MNCDP-GAN). For transparency, the approaches are illustrated using a public dataset, the French motor third party liability data. We compare the three different GANs on various aspects: ability to reproduce the original data structure and predictive models, privacy, and ease of use. We find that the MC-WGAN-GP synthesizes the best data, the CTGAN is the easiest to use, and the MNCDP-GAN guarantees differential privacy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access