BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joseph O. Deasy

Joseph O. Deasy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Visioneess.IVMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Wasserstein Image Local Analysis: Histogram of Orientations, Smoothing and Edge Detection

The Histogram of Oriented Gradient is a widely used image feature, which describes local image directionality based on numerical differentiation. Due to its ill-posed nature, small noise may lead to large errors. Conventional HOG may fail to produce meaningful directionality results in the presence of noise, which is common in medical radiographic imaging. We approach the directionality problem from a novel perspective by the use of the optimal transport map of a local image patch to a uni-color patch of its mean. We decompose the transport map into sub-work costs in different directions. We evaluated the ability of the optimal transport to quantify tumor heterogeneity from brain MRI images of patients with glioblastoma multiforme from the TCIA. By considering the entropy difference of the extracted local directionality within tumor regions, we found that patients with higher entropy in their images, had statistically significant worse overall survival (p $=0.008$), which indicates that tumors exhibiting flows in many directions may be more malignant, perhaps reflecting high tumor histologic grade, a reflection of histologic disorganization. We also explored the possibility of solving classical image processing problems such as smoothing and edge detection via optimal transport. By looking for a 2-color patch with minimum transport distance to a local patch, we derive a nonlinear shock filter, which preserves edges. Moreover, we found that the color difference of the computed 2-color patch indicates whether there is a large change in color, i.e., an edge in the given patch. In summary, we expand the usefulness of optimal transport as an image local analysis tool, to extract robust measures of imaging tumor heterogeneity for outcomes prediction as well as image pre-processing. Because of its robust nature, we find it offers several advantages over the classical approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Nested-block self-attention for robust radiotherapy planning segmentation

Although deep convolutional networks have been widely studied for head and neck (HN) organs at risk (OAR) segmentation, their use for routine clinical treatment planning is limited by a lack of robustness to imaging artifacts, low soft tissue contrast on CT, and the presence of abnormal anatomy. In order to address these challenges, we developed a computationally efficient nested block self-attention (NBSA) method that can be combined with any convolutional network. Our method achieves computational efficiency by performing non-local calculations within memory blocks of fixed spatial extent. Contextual dependencies are captured by passing information in a raster scan order between blocks, as well as through a second attention layer that causes bi-directional attention flow. We implemented our approach on three different networks to demonstrate feasibility. Following training using 200 cases, we performed comprehensive evaluations using conventional and clinical metrics on a separate set of 172 test scans sourced from external and internal institution datasets without any exclusion criteria. NBSA required a similar number of computations (15.7 gflops) as the most efficient criss-cross attention (CCA) method and generated significantly more accurate segmentations for brain stem (Dice of 0.89 vs. 0.86) and parotid glands (0.86 vs. 0.84) than CCA. NBSA's segmentations were less variable than multiple 3D methods, including for small organs with low soft-tissue contrast such as the submandibular glands (surface Dice of 0.90).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Multiple resolution residual network for automatic thoracic organs-at-risk segmentation from CT

We implemented and evaluated a multiple resolution residual network (MRRN) for multiple normal organs-at-risk (OAR) segmentation from computed tomography (CT) images for thoracic radiotherapy treatment (RT) planning. Our approach simultaneously combines feature streams computed at multiple image resolutions and feature levels through residual connections. The feature streams at each level are updated as the images are passed through various feature levels. We trained our approach using 206 thoracic CT scans of lung cancer patients with 35 scans held out for validation to segment the left and right lungs, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord. This approach was tested on 60 CT scans from the open-source AAPM Thoracic Auto-Segmentation Challenge dataset. Performance was measured using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Our approach outperformed the best-performing method in the grand challenge for hard-to-segment structures like the esophagus and achieved comparable results for all other structures. Median DSC using our method was 0.97 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.97-0.98) for the left and right lungs, 0.93 (IQR: 0.93-0.95) for the heart, 0.78 (IQR: 0.76-0.80) for the esophagus, and 0.88 (IQR: 0.86-0.89) for the spinal cord.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Kernel Wasserstein Distance

The Wasserstein distance is a powerful metric based on the theory of optimal transport. It gives a natural measure of the distance between two distributions with a wide range of applications. In contrast to a number of the common divergences on distributions such as Kullback-Leibler or Jensen-Shannon, it is (weakly) continuous, and thus ideal for analyzing corrupted data. To date, however, no kernel methods for dealing with nonlinear data have been proposed via the Wasserstein distance. In this work, we develop a novel method to compute the L2-Wasserstein distance in a kernel space implemented using the kernel trick. The latter is a general method in machine learning employed to handle data in a nonlinear manner. We evaluate the proposed approach in identifying computerized tomography (CT) slices with dental artifacts in head and neck cancer, performing unsupervised hierarchical clustering on the resulting Wasserstein distance matrix that is computed on imaging texture features extracted from each CT slice. Our experiments show that the kernel approach outperforms classical non-kernel approaches in identifying CT slices with artifacts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access