Researcher profile

Joseph K. Blitzstein

Joseph K. Blitzstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Representation for the Gauss-Laplace Transmutation

Under certain conditions, a symmetric unimodal continuous random variable $ξ$ can be represented as a scale mixture of the standard Normal distribution $Z$, i.e., $ξ= \sqrt{W} Z$, where the mixing distribution $W$ is independent of $Z.$ It is well known that if the mixing distribution is inverse Gamma, then $ξ$ is student's $t$ distribution. However, it is less well known that if the mixing distribution is Gamma, then $ξ$ is a Laplace distribution. Several existing proofs of the latter result rely on complex calculus and change of variables in integrals. We offer two simple and intuitive proofs based on representation and moment generating functions.

preprint2011arXiv

Valued Ties Tell Fewer Lies, II: Why Not To Dichotomize Network Edges With Bounded Outdegrees

Various methods have been proposed for creating a binary version of a complex network with valued ties. Rather than the default method of choosing a single threshold value about which to dichotomize, we consider a method of choosing the highest k outbound arcs from each person and assigning a binary tie, as this has the advantage of minimizing the isolation of nodes that may otherwise be weakly connected. However, simulations and real data sets establish that this method is worse than the default thresholding method and should not be generally considered to deal with valued networks.

preprint2011arXiv

Valued Ties Tell Fewer Lies: Why Not To Dichotomize Network Edges With Thresholds

In order to conduct analyses of networked systems where connections between individuals take on a range of values - counts, continuous strengths or ordinal rankings - a common technique is to dichotomize the data according to their positions with respect to a threshold value. However, there are two issues to consider: how the results of the analysis depend on the choice of threshold, and what role the presence of noise has on a system with respect to a fixed threshold value. We show that while there are principled criteria of keeping information from the valued graph in the dichotomized version, they produce such a wide range of binary graphs that only a fraction of the relevant information will be kept. Additionally, while dichotomization of predictors in linear models has a known asymptotic efficiency loss, the same process applied to network edges in a time series model will lead to an efficiency loss that grows larger as the network increases in size.