BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Josef Urban

Josef Urban appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer ScienceMachine LearningDigital LibrariesMathematical SoftwareNeural and Evolutionary ComputingSymbolic ComputationComputation and LanguageNetworking and Internet Architecturemath.LOmath.MG

Catalog footprint

What is connected

37works
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

37 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

130k Lines of Formal Topology in Two Weeks: Simple and Cheap Autoformalization for Everyone?

This is a brief description of a project that has already autoformalized a large portion of the general topology from the Munkres textbook (which has in total 241 pages in 7 chapters and 39 sections). The project has been running since November 21, 2025 and has as of January 4, 2026, produced 160k lines of formalized topology. Most of it (about 130k lines) have been done in two weeks,from December 22 to January 4, for an LLM subscription cost of about \$100. This includes a 3k-line proof of Urysohn's lemma, a 2k-line proof of Urysohn's Metrization theorem, over 10k-line proof of the Tietze extension theorem, and many more (in total over 1.5k lemmas/theorems). The approach is quite simple and cheap: build a long-running feedback loop between an LLM and a reasonably fast proof checker equipped with a core foundational library. The LLM is now instantiated as ChatGPT (mostly 5.2) or Claude Sonnet (4.5) run through the respective Codex or Claude Code command line interfaces. The proof checker is Chad Brown's higher-order set theory system Megalodon, and the core library is Brown's formalization of basic set theory and surreal numbers (including reals, etc). The rest is some prompt engineering and technical choices which we describe here. Based on the fast progress, low cost, virtually unknown ITP/library, and the simple setup available to everyone, we believe that (auto)formalization may become quite easy and ubiquitous in 2026, regardless of which proof assistant is used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Six Insights into 6G: Orientation and Input for Developing Your Strategic 6G Research Plan

This paper is a summary of the findings from a series of workshops which were held by Thinknet 6G and MUENCHNER KREIS in 2021, with the goal to provide orientation and input for developing a strategic 6G research plan. The topics selected for the workshops are aspects of 6G that we expect will have a significant impact on other industries and on society: - 6G as both a communication infrastructure and a sensing infrastructure - The extensive use of artificial intelligence in 6G - The security and resilience of 6G This paper does not go into the technical details of how to develop and implement 6G. Rather, it provides input from experts from both the wireless industry as well as from other sectors about (mostly) non-technical topics that will need to be addressed in parallel with the technical developments, such as new use cases, regulation, communication with the public, and cross-industry cooperation. We have identified six areas that will have a significant impact on the development and use of 6G, and that organizations must consider as they begin their plans and designs for 6G. Based on these six impact areas and on the discussion in the workshops, we compiled a list of the top 10 recommendations for specific areas where organizations should place their focus when developing their strategic plan for 6G. In addition, for our readers who are involved in 6G research, be it at a university, at a research institute or in industrial research, we also included a summary of the top 10 areas that require additional research, again based on the input received in the workshops. A version of this paper is also available at www.thinknet-6g.de. If you had a copy of the preview version of this paper, the text is exactly the same. Only the layout and graphics have changed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Six Questions about 6G

Although 5G (Fifth Generation) mobile technology is still in the rollout phase, research and development of 6G (Sixth Generation) wireless have already begun. This paper is an introduction to 6G wireless networks, covering the main drivers for 6G, some of the expected use cases, some of the technical challenges in 6G, example areas that will require research and new technologies, the expected timeline for 6G development and rollout, and a list of some important 6G initiatives world-wide. It was compiled as part of a series of workshops about 6G held by Thinknet 6G and MUENCHNER KREIS in 2021.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Isabelle ENIGMA

We significantly improve the performance of the E automated theorem prover on the Isabelle Sledgehammer problems by combining learning and theorem proving in several ways. In particular, we develop targeted versions of the ENIGMA guidance for the Isabelle problems, targeted versions of neural premise selection, and targeted strategies for E. The methods are trained in several iterations over hundreds of thousands untyped and typed first-order problems extracted from Isabelle. Our final best single-strategy ENIGMA and premise selection system improves the best previous version of E by 25.3% in 15 seconds, outperforming also all other previous ATP and SMT systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Learning Equational Theorem Proving

We develop Stratified Shortest Solution Imitation Learning (3SIL) to learn equational theorem proving in a deep reinforcement learning (RL) setting. The self-trained models achieve state-of-the-art performance in proving problems generated by one of the top open conjectures in quasigroup theory, the Abelian Inner Mapping (AIM) Conjecture. To develop the methods, we first use two simpler arithmetic rewriting tasks that share tree-structured proof states and sparse rewards with the AIM problems. On these tasks, 3SIL is shown to significantly outperform several established RL and imitation learning methods. The final system is then evaluated in a standalone and cooperative mode on the AIM problems. The standalone 3SIL-trained system proves in 60 seconds more theorems (70.2%) than the complex, hand-engineered Waldmeister system (65.5%). In the cooperative mode, the final system is combined with the Prover9 system, proving in 2 seconds what standalone Prover9 proves in 60 seconds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Can Neural Networks Learn Symbolic Rewriting?

This work investigates if the current neural architectures are adequate for learning symbolic rewriting. Two kinds of data sets are proposed for this research -- one based on automated proofs and the other being a synthetic set of polynomial terms. The experiments with use of the current neural machine translation models are performed and its results are discussed. Ideas for extending this line of research are proposed, and its relevance is motivated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

ENIGMA Anonymous: Symbol-Independent Inference Guiding Machine (system description)

We describe an implementation of gradient boosting and neural guidance of saturation-style automated theorem provers that does not depend on consistent symbol names across problems. For the gradient-boosting guidance, we manually create abstracted features by considering arity-based encodings of formulas. For the neural guidance, we use symbol-independent graph neural networks (GNNs) and their embedding of the terms and clauses. The two methods are efficiently implemented in the E prover and its ENIGMA learning-guided framework. To provide competitive real-time performance of the GNNs, we have developed a new context-based approach to evaluation of generated clauses in E. Clauses are evaluated jointly in larger batches and with respect to a large number of already selected clauses (context) by the GNN that estimates their collectively most useful subset in several rounds of message passing. This means that approximative inference rounds done by the GNN are efficiently interleaved with precise symbolic inference rounds done inside E. The methods are evaluated on the MPTP large-theory benchmark and shown to achieve comparable real-time performance to state-of-the-art symbol-based methods. The methods also show high complementarity, solving a large number of hard Mizar problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

First Neural Conjecturing Datasets and Experiments

We describe several datasets and first experiments with creating conjectures by neural methods. The datasets are based on the Mizar Mathematical Library processed in several forms and the problems extracted from it by the MPTP system and proved by the E prover using the ENIGMA guidance. The conjecturing experiments use the Transformer architecture and in particular its GPT-2 implementation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Guiding Inferences in Connection Tableau by Recurrent Neural Networks

We present a dataset and experiments on applying recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for guiding clause selection in the connection tableau proof calculus. The RNN encodes a sequence of literals from the current branch of the partial proof tree to a hidden vector state; using it, the system selects a clause for extending the proof tree. The training data and learning setup are described, and the results are discussed and compared with state of the art using gradient boosted trees. Additionally, we perform a conjecturing experiment in which the RNN does not just select an existing clause, but completely constructs the next tableau goal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Prolog Technology Reinforcement Learning Prover

We present a reinforcement learning toolkit for experiments with guiding automated theorem proving in the connection calculus. The core of the toolkit is a compact and easy to extend Prolog-based automated theorem prover called plCoP. plCoP builds on the leanCoP Prolog implementation and adds learning-guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search as done in the rlCoP system. Other components include a Python interface to plCoP and machine learners, and an external proof checker that verifies the validity of plCoP proofs. The toolkit is evaluated on two benchmarks and we demonstrate its extendability by two additions: (1) guidance is extended to reduction steps and (2) the standard leanCoP calculus is extended with rewrite steps and their learned guidance. We argue that the Prolog setting is suitable for combining statistical and symbolic learning methods. The complete toolkit is publicly released.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stateful Premise Selection by Recurrent Neural Networks

In this work, we develop a new learning-based method for selecting facts (premises) when proving new goals over large formal libraries. Unlike previous methods that choose sets of facts independently of each other by their rank, the new method uses the notion of \emph{state} that is updated each time a choice of a fact is made. Our stateful architecture is based on recurrent neural networks which have been recently very successful in stateful tasks such as language translation. The new method is combined with data augmentation techniques, evaluated in several ways on a standard large-theory benchmark, and compared to state-of-the-art premise approach based on gradient boosted trees. It is shown to perform significantly better and to solve many new problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tactic Learning and Proving for the Coq Proof Assistant

We present a system that utilizes machine learning for tactic proof search in the Coq Proof Assistant. In a similar vein as the TacticToe project for HOL4, our system predicts appropriate tactics and finds proofs in the form of tactic scripts. To do this, it learns from previous tactic scripts and how they are applied to proof states. The performance of the system is evaluated on the Coq Standard Library. Currently, our predictor can identify the correct tactic to be applied to a proof state 23.4% of the time. Our proof searcher can fully automatically prove 39.3% of the lemmas. When combined with the CoqHammer system, the two systems together prove 56.7% of the library's lemmas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Tactician (extended version): A Seamless, Interactive Tactic Learner and Prover for Coq

We present Tactician, a tactic learner and prover for the Coq Proof Assistant. Tactician helps users make tactical proof decisions while they retain control over the general proof strategy. To this end, Tactician learns from previously written tactic scripts and gives users either suggestions about the next tactic to be executed or altogether takes over the burden of proof synthesis. Tactician's goal is to provide users with a seamless, interactive, and intuitive experience together with robust and adaptive proof automation. In this paper, we give an overview of Tactician from the user's point of view, regarding both day-to-day usage and issues of package dependency management while learning in the large. Finally, we give a peek into Tactician's implementation as a Coq plugin and machine learning platform.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Extracting Higher-Order Goals from the Mizar Mathematical Library

Certain constructs allowed in Mizar articles cannot be represented in first-order logic but can be represented in higher-order logic. We describe a way to obtain higher-order theorem proving problems from Mizar articles that make use of these constructs. In particular, higher-order logic is used to represent schemes, a global choice construct and set level binders. The higher-order automated theorem provers Satallax and LEO-II have been run on collections of these problems and the results are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Semantic Parsing of Mathematics by Context-based Learning from Aligned Corpora and Theorem Proving

We study methods for automated parsing of informal mathematical expressions into formal ones, a main prerequisite for deep computer understanding of informal mathematical texts. We propose a context-based parsing approach that combines efficient statistical learning of deep parse trees with their semantic pruning by type checking and large-theory automated theorem proving. We show that the methods very significantly improve on previous results in parsing theorems from the Flyspeck corpus.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

BliStr: The Blind Strategymaker

BliStr is a system that automatically develops strategies for E prover on a large set of problems. The main idea is to interleave (i) iterated low-timelimit local search for new strategies on small sets of similar easy problems with (ii) higher-timelimit evaluation of the new strategies on all problems. The accumulated results of the global higher-timelimit runs are used to define and evolve the notion of "similar easy problems", and to control the selection of the next strategy to be improved. The technique was used to significantly strengthen the set of E strategies used by the MaLARea, PS-E, E-MaLeS, and E systems in the CASC@Turing 2012 competition, particularly in the Mizar division. Similar improvement was obtained on the problems created from the Flyspeck corpus.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Certified Connection Tableaux Proofs for HOL Light and TPTP

In the recent years, the Metis prover based on ordered paramodulation and model elimination has replaced the earlier built-in methods for general-purpose proof automation in HOL4 and Isabelle/HOL. In the annual CASC competition, the leanCoP system based on connection tableaux has however performed better than Metis. In this paper we show how the leanCoP's core algorithm can be implemented inside HOLLight. leanCoP's flagship feature, namely its minimalistic core, results in a very simple proof system. This plays a crucial role in extending the MESON proof reconstruction mechanism to connection tableaux proofs, providing an implementation of leanCoP that certifies its proofs. We discuss the differences between our direct implementation using an explicit Prolog stack, to the continuation passing implementation of MESON present in HOLLight and compare their performance on all core HOLLight goals. The resulting prover can be also used as a general purpose TPTP prover. We compare its performance against the resolution based Metis on TPTP and other interesting datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Developing Corpus-based Translation Methods between Informal and Formal Mathematics: Project Description

The goal of this project is to (i) accumulate annotated informal/formal mathematical corpora suitable for training semi-automated translation between informal and formal mathematics by statistical machine-translation methods, (ii) to develop such methods oriented at the formalization task, and in particular (iii) to combine such methods with learning-assisted automated reasoning that will serve as a strong semantic component. We describe these ideas, the initial set of corpora, and some initial experiments done over them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Learning-assisted Theorem Proving with Millions of Lemmas

Large formal mathematical libraries consist of millions of atomic inference steps that give rise to a corresponding number of proved statements (lemmas). Analogously to the informal mathematical practice, only a tiny fraction of such statements is named and re-used in later proofs by formal mathematicians. In this work, we suggest and implement criteria defining the estimated usefulness of the HOL Light lemmas for proving further theorems. We use these criteria to mine the large inference graph of the lemmas in the HOL Light and Flyspeck libraries, adding up to millions of the best lemmas to the pool of statements that can be re-used in later proofs. We show that in combination with learning-based relevance filtering, such methods significantly strengthen automated theorem proving of new conjectures over large formal mathematical libraries such as Flyspeck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Machine Learner for Automated Reasoning 0.4 and 0.5

Machine Learner for Automated Reasoning (MaLARea) is a learning and reasoning system for proving in large formal libraries where thousands of theorems are available when attacking a new conjecture, and a large number of related problems and proofs can be used to learn specific theorem-proving knowledge. The last version of the system has by a large margin won the 2013 CASC LTB competition. This paper describes the motivation behind the methods used in MaLARea, discusses the general approach and the issues arising in evaluation of such system, and describes the Mizar@Turing100 and CASC'24 versions of MaLARea.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Machine Learning of Coq Proof Guidance: First Experiments

We report the results of the first experiments with learning proof dependencies from the formalizations done with the Coq system. We explain the process of obtaining the dependencies from the Coq proofs, the characterization of formulas that is used for the learning, and the evaluation method. Various machine learning methods are compared on a dataset of 5021 toplevel Coq proofs coming from the CoRN repository. The best resulting method covers on average 75% of the needed proof dependencies among the first 100 predictions, which is a comparable performance of such initial experiments on other large-theory corpora.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

MaLeS: A Framework for Automatic Tuning of Automated Theorem Provers

MaLeS is an automatic tuning framework for automated theorem provers. It provides solutions for both the strategy finding as well as the strategy scheduling problem. This paper describes the tool and the methods used in it, and evaluates its performance on three automated theorem provers: E, LEO-II and Satallax. An evaluation on a subset of the TPTP library problems shows that on average a MaLeS-tuned prover solves 8.67% more problems than the prover with its default settings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Parallelizing Mizar

This paper surveys and describes the implementation of parallelization of the Mizar proof checking and of related Mizar utilities. The implementation makes use of Mizar's compiler-like division into several relatively independent passes, with typically quite different processing speeds. The information produced in earlier (typically much faster) passes can be used to parallelize the later (typically much slower) passes. The parallelization now works by splitting the formalization into a suitable number of pieces that are processed in parallel, assembling from them together the required results. The implementation is evaluated on examples from the Mizar library, and future extensions are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Formal Mathematics on Display: A Wiki for Flyspeck

The Agora system is a prototype "Wiki for Formal Mathematics", with an aim to support developing and documenting large formalizations of mathematics in a proof assistant. The functions implemented in Agora include in-browser editing, strong AI/ATP proof advice, verification, and HTML rendering. The HTML rendering contains hyperlinks and provides on-demand explanation of the proof state for each proof step. In the present paper we show the prototype Flyspeck Wiki as an instance of Agora for HOL Light formalizations. The wiki can be used for formalizations of mathematics and for writing informal wiki pages about mathematics. Such informal pages may contain islands of formal text, which is used here for providing an initial cross-linking between Hales's informal Flyspeck book, and the formal Flyspeck development. The Agora platform intends to address distributed wiki-style collaboration on large formalization projects, in particular both the aspect of immediate editing, verification and rendering of formal code, and the aspect of gradual and mutual refactoring and correspondence of the initial informal text and its formalization. Here, we highlight these features within the Flyspeck Wiki.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

HOL(y)Hammer: Online ATP Service for HOL Light

HOL(y)Hammer is an online AI/ATP service for formal (computer-understandable) mathematics encoded in the HOL Light system. The service allows its users to upload and automatically process an arbitrary formal development (project) based on HOL Light, and to attack arbitrary conjectures that use the concepts defined in some of the uploaded projects. For that, the service uses several automated reasoning systems combined with several premise selection methods trained on all the project proofs. The projects that are readily available on the server for such query answering include the recent versions of the Flyspeck, Multivariate Analysis and Complex Analysis libraries. The service runs on a 48-CPU server, currently employing in parallel for each task 7 AI/ATP combinations and 4 decision procedures that contribute to its overall performance. The system is also available for local installation by interested users, who can customize it for their own proof development. An Emacs interface allowing parallel asynchronous queries to the service is also provided. The overall structure of the service is outlined, problems that arise and their solutions are discussed, and an initial account of using the system is given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Lemma Mining over HOL Light

Large formal mathematical libraries consist of millions of atomic inference steps that give rise to a corresponding number of proved statements (lemmas). Analogously to the informal mathematical practice, only a tiny fraction of such statements is named and re-used in later proofs by formal mathematicians. In this work, we suggest and implement criteria defining the estimated usefulness of the HOL Light lemmas for proving further theorems. We use these criteria to mine the large inference graph of all lemmas in the core HOL Light library, adding thousands of the best lemmas to the pool of named statements that can be re-used in later proofs. The usefulness of the new lemmas is then evaluated by comparing the performance of automated proving of the core HOL Light theorems with and without such added lemmas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

ATP and Presentation Service for Mizar Formalizations

This paper describes the Automated Reasoning for Mizar (MizAR) service, which integrates several automated reasoning, artificial intelligence, and presentation tools with Mizar and its authoring environment. The service provides ATP assistance to Mizar authors in finding and explaining proofs, and offers generation of Mizar problems as challenges to ATP systems. The service is based on a sound translation from the Mizar language to that of first-order ATP systems, and relies on the recent progress in application of ATP systems in large theories containing tens of thousands of available facts. We present the main features of MizAR services, followed by an account of initial experiments in finding proofs with the ATP assistance. Our initial experience indicates that the tool offers substantial help in exploring the Mizar library and in preparing new Mizar articles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Dependencies in Formal Mathematics: Applications and Extraction for Coq and Mizar

Two methods for extracting detailed formal dependencies from the Coq and Mizar system are presented and compared. The methods are used for dependency extraction from two large mathematical repositories: the Coq Repository at Nijmegen and the Mizar Mathematical Library. Several applications of the detailed dependency analysis are described and proposed. Motivated by the different applications, we discuss the various kinds of dependencies that we are interested in,and the suitability of various dependency extraction methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Point-and-write --- Documenting Formal Mathematics by Reference

This paper describes the design and implementation of mechanisms for light-weight inclusion of formal mathematics in informal mathematical writings, particularly in a Web-based setting. This is conceptually done in three stages: (i) by choosing a suitable representation layer (based on RDF) for encoding the information about available resources of formal mathematics, (ii) by exporting this information from formal libraries, and (iii) by providing syntax and implementation for including formal mathematics in informal writings. We describe the use case of an author referring to formal text from an informal narrative, and discuss design choices entailed by this use case. Furthermore, we describe an implementation of the use case within the Agora prototype: a Wiki for collaborating on formalized mathematics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Premise Selection for Mathematics by Corpus Analysis and Kernel Methods

Smart premise selection is essential when using automated reasoning as a tool for large-theory formal proof development. A good method for premise selection in complex mathematical libraries is the application of machine learning to large corpora of proofs. This work develops learning-based premise selection in two ways. First, a newly available minimal dependency analysis of existing high-level formal mathematical proofs is used to build a large knowledge base of proof dependencies, providing precise data for ATP-based re-verification and for training premise selection algorithms. Second, a new machine learning algorithm for premise selection based on kernel methods is proposed and implemented. To evaluate the impact of both techniques, a benchmark consisting of 2078 large-theory mathematical problems is constructed,extending the older MPTP Challenge benchmark. The combined effect of the techniques results in a 50% improvement on the benchmark over the Vampire/SInE state-of-the-art system for automated reasoning in large theories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Theorem Proving in Large Formal Mathematics as an Emerging AI Field

In the recent years, we have linked a large corpus of formal mathematics with automated theorem proving (ATP) tools, and started to develop combined AI/ATP systems working in this setting. In this paper we first relate this project to the earlier large-scale automated developments done by Quaife with McCune's Otter system, and to the discussions of the QED project about formalizing a significant part of mathematics. Then we summarize our adventure so far, argue that the QED dreams were right in anticipating the creation of a very interesting semantic AI field, and discuss its further research directions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Large Formal Wikis: Issues and Solutions

We present several steps towards large formal mathematical wikis. The Coq proof assistant together with the CoRN repository are added to the pool of systems handled by the general wiki system described in \cite{DBLP:conf/aisc/UrbanARG10}. A smart re-verification scheme for the large formal libraries in the wiki is suggested for Mizar/MML and Coq/CoRN, based on recently developed precise tracking of mathematical dependencies. We propose to use features of state-of-the-art filesystems to allow real-time cloning and sandboxing of the entire libraries, allowing also to extend the wiki to a true multi-user collaborative area. A number of related issues are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Licensing the Mizar Mathematical Library

The Mizar Mathematical Library (MML) is a large corpus of formalised mathematical knowledge. It has been constructed over the course of many years by a large number of authors and maintainers. Yet the legal status of these efforts of the Mizar community has never been clarified. In 2010, after many years of loose deliberations, the community decided to investigate the issue of licensing the content of the MML, thereby clarifying and crystallizing the status of the texts, the text's authors, and the library's long-term maintainers. The community has settled on a copyright and license policy that suits the peculiar features of Mizar and its community. In this paper we discuss the copyright and license solutions. We offer our experience in the hopes that the communities of other libraries of formalised mathematical knowledge might take up the legal and scientific problems that we addressed for Mizar.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A Wiki for Mizar: Motivation, Considerations, and Initial Prototype

Formal mathematics has so far not taken full advantage of ideas from collaborative tools such as wikis and distributed version control systems (DVCS). We argue that the field could profit from such tools, serving both newcomers and experts alike. We describe a preliminary system for such collaborative development based on the Git DVCS. We focus, initially, on the Mizar system and its library of formalized mathematics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Automated Reasoning and Presentation Support for Formalizing Mathematics in Mizar

This paper presents a combination of several automated reasoning and proof presentation tools with the Mizar system for formalization of mathematics. The combination forms an online service called MizAR, similar to the SystemOnTPTP service for first-order automated reasoning. The main differences to SystemOnTPTP are the use of the Mizar language that is oriented towards human mathematicians (rather than the pure first-order logic used in SystemOnTPTP), and setting the service in the context of the large Mizar Mathematical Library of previous theorems,definitions, and proofs (rather than the isolated problems that are solved in SystemOnTPTP). These differences poses new challenges and new opportunities for automated reasoning and for proof presentation tools. This paper describes the overall structure of MizAR, and presents the automated reasoning systems and proof presentation tools that are combined to make MizAR a useful mathematical service.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access