BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jorge Nocedal

Jorge Nocedal contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Trust Region Method for the Optimization of Noisy Functions

Classical trust region methods were designed to solve problems in which function and gradient information are exact. This paper considers the case when there are bounded errors (or noise) in the above computations and proposes a simple modification of the trust region method to cope with these errors. The new algorithm only requires information about the size of the errors in the function evaluations and incurs no additional computational expense. It is shown that, when applied to a smooth (but not necessarily convex) objective function, the iterates of the algorithm visit a neighborhood of stationarity infinitely often, and that the rest of the sequence cannot stray too far away, as measured by function values. Numerical results illustrate how the classical trust region algorithm may fail in the presence of noise, and how the proposed algorithm ensures steady progress towards stationarity in these cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the Numerical Performance of Derivative-Free Optimization Methods Based on Finite-Difference Approximations

The goal of this paper is to investigate an approach for derivative-free optimization that has not received sufficient attention in the literature and is yet one of the simplest to implement and parallelize. It consists of computing gradients of a smoothed approximation of the objective function (and constraints), and employing them within established codes. These gradient approximations are calculated by finite differences, with a differencing interval determined by the noise level in the functions and a bound on the second or third derivatives. It is assumed that noise level is known or can be estimated by means of difference tables or sampling. The use of finite differences has been largely dismissed in the derivative-free optimization literature as too expensive in terms of function evaluations and/or as impractical when the objective function contains noise. The test results presented in this paper suggest that such views should be re-examined and that the finite-difference approach has much to be recommended. The tests compared NEWUOA, DFO-LS and COBYLA against the finite-difference approach on three classes of problems: general unconstrained problems, nonlinear least squares, and general nonlinear programs with equality constraints.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Constrained and Composite Optimization via Adaptive Sampling Methods

The motivation for this paper stems from the desire to develop an adaptive sampling method for solving constrained optimization problems in which the objective function is stochastic and the constraints are deterministic. The method proposed in this paper is a proximal gradient method that can also be applied to the composite optimization problem min f(x) + h(x), where f is stochastic and h is convex (but not necessarily differentiable). Adaptive sampling methods employ a mechanism for gradually improving the quality of the gradient approximation so as to keep computational cost to a minimum. The mechanism commonly employed in unconstrained optimization is no longer reliable in the constrained or composite optimization settings because it is based on pointwise decisions that cannot correctly predict the quality of the proximal gradient step. The method proposed in this paper measures the result of a complete step to determine if the gradient approximation is accurate enough; otherwise a more accurate gradient is generated and a new step is computed. Convergence results are established both for strongly convex and general convex f. Numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the practical behavior of the method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access