Source author record

Jonathan Gemmell

Jonathan Gemmell appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Information Retrieval Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Social and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Behavioral Player Rating in Competitive Online Shooter Games

Competitive online games use rating systems for matchmaking; progression-based algorithms that estimate the skill level of players with interpretable ratings in terms of the outcome of the games they played. However, the overall experience of players is shaped by factors beyond the sole outcome of their games. In this paper, we engineer several features from in-game statistics to model players and create ratings that accurately represent their behavior and true performance level. We then compare the estimating power of our behavioral ratings against ratings created with three mainstream rating systems by predicting rank of players in four popular game modes from the competitive shooter genre. Our results show that the behavioral ratings present more accurate performance estimations while maintaining the interpretability of the created representations. Considering different aspects of the playing behavior of players and using behavioral ratings for matchmaking can lead to match-ups that are more aligned with players' goals and interests, consequently resulting in a more enjoyable gaming experience.

preprint2020arXiv

The Evaluation of Rating Systems in Online Free-for-All Games

Online competitive games have become increasingly popular. To ensure an exciting and competitive environment, these games routinely attempt to match players with similar skill levels. Matching players is often accomplished through a rating system. There has been an increasing amount of research on developing such rating systems. However, less attention has been given to the evaluation metrics of these systems. In this paper, we present an exhaustive analysis of six metrics for evaluating rating systems in online competitive games. We compare traditional metrics such as accuracy. We then introduce other metrics adapted from the field of information retrieval. We evaluate these metrics against several well-known rating systems on a large real-world dataset of over 100,000 free-for-all matches. Our results show stark differences in their utility. Some metrics do not consider deviations between two ranks. Others are inordinately impacted by new players. Many do not capture the importance of distinguishing between errors in higher ranks and lower ranks. Among all metrics studied, we recommend Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) because not only does it resolve the issues faced by other metrics, but it also offers flexibility to adjust the evaluations based on the goals of the system

preprint2016arXiv

Infusing Collaborative Recommenders with Distributed Representations

Recommender systems assist users in navigating complex information spaces and focus their attention on the content most relevant to their needs. Often these systems rely on user activity or descriptions of the content. Social annotation systems, in which users collaboratively assign tags to items, provide another means to capture information about users and items. Each of these data sources provides unique benefits, capturing different relationships. In this paper, we propose leveraging multiple sources of data: ratings data as users report their affinity toward an item, tagging data as users assign annotations to items, and item data collected from an online database. Taken together, these datasets provide the opportunity to learn rich distributed representations by exploiting recent advances in neural network architectures. We first produce representations that subjectively capture interesting relationships among the data. We then empirically evaluate the utility of the representations to predict a user's rating on an item and show that it outperforms more traditional representations. Finally, we demonstrate that traditional representations can be combined with representations trained through a neural network to achieve even better results.