Source author record

Jonatan Gomez

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
4topics
2close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2025arXiv

On the Stieltjes Approximation Error to Logarithmic Integral

We study the approximation error ε(x)=li⁡∗(x)−li⁡(x)\varepsilon(x)=\operatorname{li}_{*}(x)-\operatorname{li}(x) arising from the classical Stieltjes asymptotic expansion for the logarithmic integral. Our analysis is based on the discrete values εk=ε(ek)\varepsilon_k=\varepsilon(e^{k}) and their increments Δk=εk+1−εk,Δ_k=\varepsilon_{k+1}-\varepsilon_k, for which we derive new unconditional analytic bounds. Using precise integral representations for each increment ΔkΔ_k, together with sharp upper and lower estimates for the associated kernel integrals, we obtain computable and uniform bounds for εk\varepsilon_k for all k≥1k\ge 1, and hence for ε(x)\varepsilon(x) for all x≥ex\ge e. We prove the following unconditional bounds: 132πln⁡(x)+o(1ln⁡(x))≤ε(x)≤132πln⁡(x)+o(1ln⁡(x))for all e≤x≤e1000,\begin{array}{l} \displaystyle \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2π}{\ln(x)}} + o\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(x)}}\right) \le \varepsilon(x) \le \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2π}{\ln(x)}} + o\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(x)}}\right) \text{for all } e \le x \le e^{1000}, \end{array} 132πln⁡(x)+o(1ln⁡(x))−Cl≤ε(x)≤132πln⁡(x)+o(1ln⁡(x))+Crfor all x>e1000 with Cl=0.0000035462 and Cr=0.0000021511.\begin{array}{l} \displaystyle \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2π}{\ln(x)}} + o\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(x)}}\right) - C_{l} \le \varepsilon(x) \le \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2π}{\ln(x)}} + o\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(x)}}\right) + C_{r} \text{for all } x>e^{1000} \text{ with } C_{l} = 0.0000035462\text{ and } C_{r}=0.0000021511. \end{array} These results establish the first fully explicit global bounds for the Stieltjes approximation error. Finally, our findings strongly support the conjectural behaviour: ε(x)=132πln⁡(x)+o ⁣(1ln⁡(x)),x≥e. \varepsilon(x) = \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2π}{\ln(x)}} + o\!\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(x)}}\right), \qquad x\ge e.

preprint2023arXiv

On Primorial Numbers

Prime numbers have attracted the attention of mathematiciansand enthusiasts for millenniums due to their simple definition and remarkable properties. In this paper, we study primorial numbers (the product of the first prime numbers) to define primorial sets, primorial intervals, primorial tables, and primorial totative numbers. We establish relationships between prime numbers and primorial totative numbers and between admissible k-tuples of prime numbers and admissible k-tuples of primorial totative. Finally, we study the Goldbach conjecture and derive four Goldbach conjectures using primordial intervals, twin, cousin, and sexy prime numbers.

preprint2023arXiv

The Prime Number Theorem and Primorial Numbers

Counting the number of prime numbers up to a certain natural number and describing the asymptotic behavior of such a counting function has been studied by famous mathematicians like Gauss, Legendre, Dirichlet, and Euler. The prime number theorem determines that such asymptotic behavior is similar to the asymptotic behavior of the number divided by its natural logarithm. In this paper, we take advantage of a multiplicative representation of a number and the properties of the logarithm function to express the prime number theorem in terms of primorial numbers, and n-primorial totative numbers. A primorial number is the multiplication of the first n prime numbers while n-primorial totatives are the numbers that are coprime to the n-th primorial number. By doing this we can define several different functions that can be used to approximate the behavior of the prime counting function asymptotically.

preprint2020arXiv

Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization

The major difficulty in Multi-objective Optimization Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) is how to find an appropriate solution that is able to converge towards the true Pareto Front with high diversity. Most existing methodologies, which have demonstrated their niche on various practical problems involving two and three objectives, face significant challenges in the dependency of the selection of the EA parameters. Moreover, the process of setting such parameters is considered time-consuming, and several research works have tried to deal with this problem. This paper proposed a new Multi-objective Algorithm as an extension of the Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary algorithm (HAEA) called MoHAEA. MoHAEA allows dynamic adaptation of the application of operator probabilities (rates) to evolve with the solution of the multi-objective problems combining the dominance- and decomposition-based approaches. MoHAEA is compared with four states of the art MOEAs, namely MOEA/D, paλλ-MOEA/D, MOEA/D-AWA, and NSGA-II on ten widely used multi-objective test problems. Experimental results indicate that MoHAEA outperforms the benchmark algorithms in terms of how it is able to find a well-covered and well-distributed set of points on the Pareto Front.

preprint2020arXiv

Obtaining Basic Algebra Formulas with Genetic Programming and Functional Rewriting

In this paper, we develop a set of genetic programming operators and an initialization population process based on concepts of functional programming rewriting for boosting inductive genetic programming. Such genetic operators are used within a hybrid adaptive evolutionary algorithm that evolves operator rates at the same time it evolves the solution. Solutions are represented using recursive functions where genome is encoded as an ordered list of trees and phenotype is written in a simple functional programming language that uses rewriting as operational semantic (computational model). The fitness is the number of examples successfully deduced over the cardinal of the set of examples. Parents are selected following a tournament selection mechanism and the next population is obtained following a steady-state strategy. The evolutionary process can use some previous functions (programs) induced as background knowledge. We compare the performance of our technique in a set of hard problems (for classical genetic programming). In particular, we take as test-bed the problem of obtaining equivalent algebraic expressions of some notable products (such as square of a binomial, and cube of a binomial), and the recursive formulas of sum of the first n and squares of the first n natural numbers.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.