Source author record

John W. Chinneck

John W. Chinneck appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Faster Maximum Feasible Subsystem Solutions for Dense Constraint Matrices

Finding the largest cardinality feasible subset of an infeasible set of linear constraints is the Maximum Feasible Subsystem problem (MAX FS). Solving this problem is crucial in a wide range of applications such as machine learning and compressive sensing. Although MAX FS is NP-hard, useful heuristic algorithms exist, but these can be slow for large problems. We extend the existing heuristics for the case of dense constraint matrices to greatly increase their speed while preserving or improving solution quality. We test the extended algorithms on two applications that have dense constraint matrices: binary classification, and sparse recovery in compressive sensing. In both cases, speed is greatly increased with no loss of accuracy.

preprint2020arXiv

Maximum Feasible Subsystem Algorithms for Recovery of Compressively Sensed Speech

The goal in signal compression is to reduce the size of the input signal without a significant loss in the quality of the recovered signal. One way to achieve this goal is to apply the principles of compressive sensing, but this has not been particularly successful for real-world signals that are insufficiently sparse, such as speech. We present three new algorithms based on solutions for the maximum feasible subsystem problem (MAX FS) that improve on the state of the art in recovery of compressed speech signals: more highly compressed signals can be successfully recovered with greater quality. The new recovery algorithms deliver sparser solutions when compared with those obtained using traditional compressive sensing recovery algorithms. When tested by recovering compressively sensed speech signals in the TIMIT speech database, the recovered speech has better perceptual quality than speech recovered using traditional compressive sensing recovery algorithms.