BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

John Shi

John Shi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SPMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Graph Signal Processing: Dualizing GSP Sampling in the Vertex and Spectral Domains

Vertex based and spectral based GSP sampling has been studied recently. The literature recognizes that methods in one domain do not have a counterpart in the other domain. This paper shows that in fact one can develop a unified graph signal sampling theory with analogous interpretations in both domains just like sampling in traditional DSP. To achieve it, we introduce a spectral shift $M$ acting in the spectral domain rather than shift $A$ that acts in the vertex domain. This leads to a GSP theory that starts from the spectral domain, for example, linear shift invariant (LSI) filtering in the spectral domain is with polynomials $P(M)$. We then develop GSP vertex and spectral domain dual versions for each of the four standard sampling steps of subsampling, decimation, upsampling, and interpolation. We show how GSP sampling reduces to DSP sampling when the graph is the directed time cycle graph. Simple examples illustrate the impact of choices that are available in GSP sampling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Companion Model -- a Canonical Model in Graph Signal Processing

This paper introduces a $\textit{canonical}$ graph signal model defined by a $\textit{canonical}$ graph and a $\textit{canonical}$ shift, the $\textit{companion}$ graph and the $\textit{companion}$ shift. These are canonical because, under standard conditions, we show that any graph signal processing (GSP) model can be transformed into the canonical model. The transform that obtains this is the graph $z$-transform ($\textrm{G$z$T}$) that we introduce. The GSP canonical model comes closest to the discrete signal processing (DSP) time signal models: the structure of the companion shift decomposes into a line shift and a signal continuation just like the DSP shift and the GSP canonical graph is a directed line graph with a terminal condition reflecting the signal continuation condition. We further show that, surprisingly, in the canonical model, convolution of graph signals is fast convolution by the DSP FFT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Pooling in Graph Convolutional Neural Networks

Graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs) are a powerful extension of deep learning techniques to graph-structured data problems. We empirically evaluate several pooling methods for GCNNs, and combinations of those graph pooling methods with three different architectures: GCN, TAGCN, and GraphSAGE. We confirm that graph pooling, especially DiffPool, improves classification accuracy on popular graph classification datasets and find that, on average, TAGCN achieves comparable or better accuracy than GCN and GraphSAGE, particularly for datasets with larger and sparser graph structures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access