BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

John Derrick

John Derrick appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer ScienceSoftware EngineeringDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingProgramming Languages

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Defining and Verifying Durable Opacity: Correctness for Persistent Software Transactional Memory

Non-volatile memory (NVM), aka persistent memory, is a new paradigm for memory that preserves its contents even after power loss. The expected ubiquity of NVM has stimulated interest in the design of novel concepts ensuring correctness of concurrent programming abstractions in the face of persistency. So far, this has lead to the design of a number of persistent concurrent data structures, built to satisfy an associated notion of correctness: durable linearizability. In this paper, we transfer the principle of durable concurrent correctness to the area of software transactional memory (STM). Software transactional memory algorithms allow for concurrent access to shared state. Like linearizability for concurrent data structures, opacity is the established notion of correctness for STMs. First, we provide a novel definition of durable opacity extending opacity to handle crashes and recovery in the context of NVM. Second, we develop a durably opaque version of an existing STM algorithm, namely the Transactional Mutex Lock (TML). Third, we design a proof technique for durable opacity based on refinement between TML and an operational characterisation of durable opacity by adapting the TMS2 specification. Finally, we apply this proof technique to show that the durable version of TML is indeed durably opaque. The correctness proof is mechanized within Isabelle.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Causal Linearizability

Most work on the verification of concurrent objects for shared memory assumes sequential consistency, but most multicore processors support only weak memory models that do not provide sequential consistency. Furthermore, most verification efforts focus on the linearizability of concurrent objects, but there are existing implementations optimized to run on weak memory models that are not linearizable. In this paper, we address these problems by introducing causal linearizability, a correctness condition for concurrent objects running on weak memory models. Like linearizability itself, causal linearizability enables concurrent objects to be composed, under weak constraints on the client's behaviour. We specify these constraints by introducing a notion of operation-race freedom, where programs that satisfy this property are guaranteed to behave as if their shared objects were in fact linearizable. We apply these ideas to objects from the Linux kernel, optimized to run on TSO, the memory model of the x86 processor family.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Proceedings 17th International Workshop on Refinement

We are proud to present the papers from the 17th Refinement Workshop, co-located with FM 2015 held in Oslo, Norway on June 22nd, 2015. Refinement is one of the cornerstones of a formal approach to software engineering: the process of developing a more detailed design or implementation from an abstract specification through a sequence of mathematically-based steps that maintain correctness with respect to the original specification. This 17th workshop continued a 20+ year tradition under the auspices of the British Computer Society (BCS) FACS special interest group. This is the third volume that has appeared as an EPTCS proceedings, and we would like to thank the editorial board (and in particular Rob van Glabbeek) for their help and cooperation in making this happen. The organisers would like to thank everyone: the authors, BCS-FACS, EPTCS, and the organisers of FM 2015 for their help in organising this workshop, the participants of the workshop, and the reviewers involved in selecting the papers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Verifying linearizability: A comparative survey

Linearizability has become the key correctness criterion for concurrent data structures, ensuring that histories of the concurrent object under consideration are consistent, where consistency is judged with respect to a sequential history of a corresponding abstract data structure. Linearizability allows any order of concurrent (i.e., overlapping) calls to operations to be picked, but requires the real-time order of non-overlapping to be preserved. Over the years numerous techniques for verifying linearizability have been developed, using a variety of formal foundations such as refinement, shape analysis, reduction, etc. However, as the underlying framework, nomenclature and terminology for each method differs, it has become difficult for practitioners to judge the differences between each approach, and hence, judge the methodology most appropriate for the data structure at hand. We compare the major of methods used to verify linearizability, describe the main contribution of each method, and compare their advantages and limitations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Data refinement for true concurrency

The majority of modern systems exhibit sophisticated concurrent behaviour, where several system components modify and observe the system state with fine-grained atomicity. Many systems (e.g., multi-core processors, real-time controllers) also exhibit truly concurrent behaviour, where multiple events can occur simultaneously. This paper presents data refinement defined in terms of an interval-based framework, which includes high-level operators that capture non-deterministic expression evaluation. By modifying the type of an interval, our theory may be specialised to cover data refinement of both discrete and continuous systems. We present an interval-based encoding of forward simulation, then prove that our forward simulation rule is sound with respect to our data refinement definition. A number of rules for decomposing forward simulation proofs over both sequential and parallel composition are developed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Proceedings 16th International Refinement Workshop

The 16th BCS-FACS Refinement Workshop was co-located with iFM 2013 held in Turku, Finland on June 11th, 2013. This volume contains the 6 papers selected for presentation at the workshop following a peer review process. The papers cover a wide range of topics in the theory and application of refinement. Refinement is one of the cornerstones of a formal approach to software engineering: the process of developing a more detailed design or implementation from an abstract specification through a sequence of mathematically-based steps that maintain correctness with respect to the original specification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Simplifying proofs of linearisability using layers of abstraction

Linearisability has become the standard correctness criterion for concurrent data structures, ensuring that every history of invocations and responses of concurrent operations has a matching sequential history. Existing proofs of linearisability require one to identify so-called linearisation points within the operations under consideration, which are atomic statements whose execution causes the effect of an operation to be felt. However, identification of linearisation points is a non-trivial task, requiring a high degree of expertise. For sophisticated algorithms such as Heller et al's lazy set, it even is possible for an operation to be linearised by the concurrent execution of a statement outside the operation being verified. This paper proposes an alternative method for verifying linearisability that does not require identification of linearisation points. Instead, using an interval-based logic, we show that every behaviour of each concrete operation over any interval is a possible behaviour of a corresponding abstraction that executes with coarse-grained atomicity. This approach is applied to Heller et al's lazy set to show that verification of linearisability is possible without having to consider linearisation points within the program code.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Proving linearisability via coarse-grained abstraction

Linearisability has become the standard safety criterion for concurrent data structures ensuring that the effect of a concrete operation takes place after the execution some atomic statement (often referred to as the linearisation point). Identification of linearisation points is a non-trivial task and it is even possible for an operation to be linearised by the execution of other concurrent operations. This paper presents a method for verifying linearisability that does not require identification of linearisation points in the concrete code. Instead, we show that the concrete program is a refinement of some coarse-grained abstraction. The linearisation points in the abstraction are straightforward to identify and the linearisability proof itself is simpler due to the coarse granularity of its atomic statements. The concrete fine-grained program is a refinement of the coarse-grained program, and hence is also linearisable because every behaviour of the concrete program is a possible behaviour its abstraction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Building a refinement checker for Z

In previous work we have described how refinements can be checked using a temporal logic based model-checker, and how we have built a model-checker for Z by providing a translation of Z into the SAL input language. In this paper we draw these two strands of work together and discuss how we have implemented refinement checking in our Z2SAL toolset. The net effect of this work is that the SAL toolset can be used to check refinements between Z specifications supplied as input files written in the LaTeX mark-up. Two examples are used to illustrate the approach and compare it with a manual translation and refinement check.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Proceedings 15th International Refinement Workshop

Refinement is one of the cornerstones of a formal approach to software engineering: the process of developing a more detailed design or implementation from an abstract specification through a sequence of mathematically-based steps that maintain correctness with respect to the original specification. The aim of this BCS FACS Refinement Workshop, is to bring together people who are interested in the development of more concrete designs or executable programs from abstract specifications using formal notations, tool support for formal software development, and practical experience with formal refinement methodologies. The purpose of the workshop is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, and discussion of common ground and key differences. This 15th workshop continued a 20 year tradition in refinement workshops run under the auspices of the British Computer Society (BCS) FACS special interest group. After the first seven editions had been held in the UK, in 1998 it was combined with the Australasian Refinement Workshop to form the International Refinement Workshop, hosted at The Australian National University. Six more editions have followed in a variety of locations, all with electronic published proceedings and associated journal special issues.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access