Researcher profile

Johannes Scholz

Johannes Scholz contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Deep-Learning vs Regression: Prediction of Tourism Flow with Limited Data

Modern tourism in the 21st century is facing numerous challenges. One of these challenges is the rapidly growing number of tourists in space limited regions such as historical city centers, museums or geographical bottlenecks like narrow valleys. In this context, a proper and accurate prediction of tourism volume and tourism flow within a certain area is important and critical for visitor management tasks such as visitor flow control and prevention of overcrowding. Static flow control methods like limiting access to hotspots or using conventional low level controllers could not solve the problem yet. In this paper, we empirically evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art deep-learning methods in the field of visitor flow prediction with limited data by using available granular data supplied by a tourism region and comparing the results to ARIMA, a classical statistical method. Our results show that deep-learning models yield better predictions compared to the ARIMA method, while both featuring faster inference times and being able to incorporate additional input features.

preprint2022arXiv

How Many Equations of Motion Describe a Moving Human?

A human is a thing that moves in space. Like all things that move in space, we can in principle use differential equations to describe their motion as a set of functions that maps time to position (and velocity, acceleration, and so on). With inanimate objects, we can reliably predict their trajectories by using differential equations that account for up to the second-order time derivative of their position, as is commonly done in analytical mechanics. With animate objects, though, and with humans, in particular, we do not know the cardinality of the set of equations that define their trajectory. We may be tempted to think, for example, that by reason of their complexity in cognition or behaviour as compared to, say, a rock, then the motion of humans requires a more complex description than the one generally used to describe the motion of physical systems. In this paper, we examine a real-world dataset on human mobility and consider the information that is added by each (computed, but denoised) additional time derivative, and find the maximum order of derivatives of the position that, for that particular dataset, cannot be expressed as a linear transformation of the previous. In this manner, we identify the dimensionality of a minimal model that correctly describes the observed trajectories. We find that every higher-order derivative after the acceleration is linearly dependent upon one of the previous time-derivatives. This measure is robust against noise and the choice for differentiation techniques that we use to compute the time-derivatives numerically as a function of the measured position. This result imposes empirical constraints on the possible sets of differential equations that can be used to describe the kinematics of a moving human.