BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Johannes Hirth

Johannes Hirth contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer ScienceMachine LearningInformation Theorymath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Exploring Scale-Measures of Data Sets

Measurement is a fundamental building block of numerous scientific models and their creation. This is in particular true for data driven science. Due to the high complexity and size of modern data sets, the necessity for the development of understandable and efficient scaling methods is at hand. A profound theory for scaling data is scale-measures, as developed in the field of formal concept analysis. Recent developments indicate that the set of all scale-measures for a given data set constitutes a lattice and does hence allow efficient exploring algorithms. In this work we study the properties of said lattice and propose a novel scale-measure exploration algorithm that is based on the well-known and proven attribute exploration approach. Our results motivate multiple applications in scale recommendation, most prominently (semi-)automatic scaling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Quantifying the Conceptual Error in Dimensionality Reduction

Dimension reduction of data sets is a standard problem in the realm of machine learning and knowledge reasoning. They affect patterns in and dependencies on data dimensions and ultimately influence any decision-making processes. Therefore, a wide variety of reduction procedures are in use, each pursuing different objectives. A so far not considered criterion is the conceptual continuity of the reduction mapping, i.e., the preservation of the conceptual structure with respect to the original data set. Based on the notion scale-measure from formal concept analysis we present in this work a) the theoretical foundations to detect and quantify conceptual errors in data scalings; b) an experimental investigation of our approach on eleven data sets that were respectively treated with a variant of non-negative matrix factorization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Knowledge Cores in Large Formal Contexts

Knowledge computation tasks are often infeasible for large data sets. This is in particular true when deriving knowledge bases in formal concept analysis (FCA). Hence, it is essential to come up with techniques to cope with this problem. Many successful methods are based on random processes to reduce the size of the investigated data set. This, however, makes them hardly interpretable with respect to the discovered knowledge. Other approaches restrict themselves to highly supported subsets and omit rare and interesting patterns. An essentially different approach is used in network science, called $k$-cores. These are able to reflect rare patterns if they are well connected in the data set. In this work, we study $k$-cores in the realm of FCA by exploiting the natural correspondence to bi-partite graphs. This structurally motivated approach leads to a comprehensible extraction of knowledge cores from large formal contexts data sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access