BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joel Scheuner

Joel Scheuner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingSoftware EngineeringPerformance

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fusionize: Improving Serverless Application Performance through Feedback-Driven Function Fusion

Serverless computing increases developer productivity by removing operational concerns such as managing hardware or software runtimes. Developers, however, still need to partition their application into functions, which can be error-prone and adds complexity: Using a small function size where only the smallest logical unit of an application is inside a function maximizes flexibility and reusability. Yet, having small functions leads to invocation overheads, additional cold starts, and may increase cost due to busy waiting. In this paper we present Fusionize, a framework that removes these concerns from developers by automatically fusing the application code into a multi-function orchestration with varying function size. Developers only need to write the application code following a lightweight programming model and do not need to worry how the application is turned into functions. Our framework automatically fuses different parts of the application into functions and manages their interactions. Leveraging monitoring data, the framework optimizes the distribution of application parts to functions to optimize deployment goals such as end-to-end latency and cost. Using two example applications, we show that Fusionize can automatically and iteratively improve the deployment artifacts of the application.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Let's Trace It: Fine-Grained Serverless Benchmarking using Synchronous and Asynchronous Orchestrated Applications

Making serverless computing widely applicable requires detailed performance understanding. Although contemporary benchmarking approaches exist, they report only coarse results, do not apply distributed tracing, do not consider asynchronous applications, and provide limited capabilities for (root cause) analysis. Addressing this gap, we design and implement ServiBench, a serverless benchmarking suite. ServiBench (i) leverages synchronous and asynchronous serverless applications representative of production usage, (ii) extrapolates cloud-provider data to generate realistic workloads, (iii) conducts comprehensive, end-to-end experiments to capture application-level performance, (iv) analyzes results using a novel approach based on (distributed) serverless tracing, and (v) supports comprehensively serverless performance analysis. With ServiBench, we conduct comprehensive experiments on AWS, covering five common performance factors: median latency, cold starts, tail latency, scalability, and dynamic workloads. We find that the median end-to-end latency of serverless applications is often dominated not by function computation but by external service calls, orchestration, or trigger-based coordination. We release collected experimental data under FAIR principles and ServiBench as a tested, extensible open-source tool.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Review of Serverless Use Cases and their Characteristics

The serverless computing paradigm promises many desirable properties for cloud applications - low-cost, fine-grained deployment, and management-free operation. Consequently, the paradigm has underwent rapid growth: there currently exist tens of serverless platforms and all global cloud providers host serverless operations. To help tune existing platforms, guide the design of new serverless approaches, and overall contribute to understanding this paradigm, in this work we present a long-term, comprehensive effort to identify, collect, and characterize 89 serverless use cases. We survey use cases, sourced from white and grey literature, and from consultations with experts in areas such as scientific computing. We study each use case using 24 characteristics, including general aspects, but also workload, application, and requirements. When the use cases employ workflows, we further analyze their characteristics. Overall, we hope our study will be useful for both academia and industry, and encourage the community to further share and communicate their use cases. This article appears also as a SPEC Technical Report: https://research.spec.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/rg_cloud/endorsed_publications/SPEC_RG_2020_Serverless_Usecases.pdf The article may be submitted for peer-reviewed publication.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Function-as-a-Service Performance Evaluation: A Multivocal Literature Review

Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) is one form of the serverless cloud computing paradigm and is defined through FaaS platforms (e.g., AWS Lambda) executing event-triggered code snippets (i.e., functions). Many studies that empirically evaluate the performance of such FaaS platforms have started to appear but we are currently lacking a comprehensive understanding of the overall domain. To address this gap, we conducted a multivocal literature review (MLR) covering 112 studies from academic (51) and grey (61) literature. We find that existing work mainly studies the AWS Lambda platform and focuses on micro-benchmarks using simple functions to measure CPU speed and FaaS platform overhead (i.e., container cold starts). Further, we discover a mismatch between academic and industrial sources on tested platform configurations, find that function triggers remain insufficiently studied, and identify HTTP API gateways and cloud storages as the most used external service integrations. Following existing guidelines on experimentation in cloud systems, we discover many flaws threatening the reproducibility of experiments presented in the surveyed studies. We conclude with a discussion of gaps in literature and highlight methodological suggestions that may serve to improve future FaaS performance evaluation studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Serverless Applications: Why, When, and How?

Serverless computing shows good promise for efficiency and ease-of-use. Yet, there are only a few, scattered and sometimes conflicting reports on questions such as 'Why do so many companies adopt serverless?', 'When are serverless applications well suited?', and 'How are serverless applications currently implemented?' To address these questions, we analyze 89 serverless applications from open-source projects, industrial sources, academic literature, and scientific computing - the most extensive study to date.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access