BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jingya Zhu

Jingya Zhu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-phhep-exastro-ph.HE

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Light dark matter confronted with the 95 GeV diphoton excess

The correlation between Higgs-like scalars and light dark matter is an interesting topic, especially now that a $125 GeV$ Higgs was discovered and dark matter (DM) searches got negative results. The $95 GeV$ excess reported by the CMS collaboration with $132 fb^{-1}$ data recently, and the DM search results by XENONnT and LZ collaborations motivate us to revise that. In this work, we study that in the GUT-scale constrained (GUTc) Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Model (NMSSM), where most parameters are input at the GUT scale, but with scalar and gaugino masses not unified there. In the calculation we also consider other recent experimental constraints, such as Higgs data, Supersymmetry (SUSY) searches, DM relic density, etc. After detailed analysis and discussion, we find that: (i) The light DM can be bino- or singlino-dominated, but can be mixed with minor components of Higgsino. (ii) Both cases can get right relic density and sizable Higgs invisible decay, by adjusting the dimensionless parameters $λ, κ$, or suitably mixing with Higgsino. (iii) Both cases can have four funnel annihilation mechanisms, i.e., annihilating through $Z, a_1, h_2, h_1$. (iv) Samples with right relic density usually get weak signal of Higgs invisible decay at future lepton collider, but the $95 GeV$ scalar can have sizable $b\bar{b}$ signal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Smuon contribution to muon g-2 in Grand Unified supersymmetric theories

In GUT-scale constrained (GUTc) supersymmetric (SUSY) models, the mass of smuon $\tildeμ_1$ is typically heavier than that of stau $\tildeτ_1$, and stau co-annihilation is a typical annihilation mechanism of dark matter. However, light smuon is more favored by the muon $g-2$ anomaly, thus smuon-neutralino loop contribution to muon $g-2$ is usually smaller than that of sneutrino-chargino. Inspired by the latest muon $g-2$ results, we take the GUTc- Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Model (NMSSM) as an example, where the gaugino (Higgs) masses are not unified to the usual parameter $M_{1/2}$ ($M_0$), exploring its possibility of light smuon and its contribution to muon $g-2$. After complicated calculations and discussions, we conclude that in GUTc-NMSSM the smuon can be lighter than stau. In this light-smuon scenario, the contribution of smuon-neutralino loop to the muon $g-2$ can be larger than that of the sneutrino-chargino loop. The annihilation mechanisms of dark matter are dominated by multiple slepton or chargino co-annihilation. In our calculations, we consider also other latest related constraints like Higgs data, SUSY searches, dark matter relic density and direct detections, etc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Canonical interpretation of the $D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$ resonance

The $D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$ resonance observed by LHCb Collaboration is a strong candidate of the $D_{s}(2^1S_0)$ state according to its spin parity and strong decay mode. However, the measured mass seems relatively lower than the previous theoretical predictions, which interests the coupled channel interpretations in the literature. In this work, we adopt an alternate approach, taking into account the screening effects in the potential model, to describe the $D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$ resonance. The mass spectrum and strong decays of the excited charmed-strange mesons are investigated within the modified relativized quark model and $^3P_0$ model. The calculated mass and width of the $D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$ are consistent with the experimental observations, which indicate that it can be reasonably interpreted as the $D_{s}(2^{1}S_{0})$ state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The possible assignments of the scalar $K_0^*(1950)$ and $K_0^*(2130)$ within the $^3P_0$ model

We have evaluated the strong decays of the $K_0^*(1950)$ and $K_0^*(2130)$ within the $^3P_0$ model, by employing the meson wave functions from the relativized quark model. By comparing with the experimental measurements, the $K_0^*(2130)$ could be assigned as $K_0^*(3^3P_0)$, while the $K_0^*(1950)$ seems like an exotic state, because its width can not be reasonably reproduced within the $^3P_0$ model. We also predict that the $K_0^*(2^3P_0)$ state has a mass of about $1811$ MeV and a width of about $656$ MeV, while the $K_0^*(4^3P_0)$ state has a mass of about $2404$ MeV and a width of about $180$ MeV.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Novel Scenario in the Semi-constrained NMSSM

In this work, we develop a novel efficient scan method, combining the Heuristically Search (HS) and the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), where the HS can shift marginal samples to perfect samples, and the GAN can generate a huge amount of recommended samples from noise in a short time. With this efficient method, we find a new scenario in the semi-constrained Next-to Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (scNMSSM), or NMSSM with non-universal Higgs masses. In this scenario, (i) Both muon g-2 and right relic density can be satisfied, along with the high mass bound of gluino, etc. As far as we know, that had not been realized in the scNMSSM before this work. (ii) With the right relic density, the lightest neutralinos are singlino-dominated, and can be as light as 0-12 GeV. (iii) The future direct detections XENONnT and LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ-7 2T) can give strong constraints to this scenario. (iv) The current indirect constraints to Higgs invisible decay $h_2\to \tildeχ^0_1 \tildeχ^0_1$ are weak, but the direct detection of Higgs invisible decay at the future HL-LHC may cover half of the samples, and that of the CEPC may cover most. (v) The branching ratio of Higgs exotic decay $h_2\to h_1h_1, a_1a_1$ can be over 20 percent, while their contributions to the invisible decay $h_2\to4χ_1^0$ are very small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Funnel annihilations of light dark matter and the invisible decay of the Higgs boson

The semi-constrained NMSSM (scNMSSM), or NMSSM with non-universal Higgs masses, can naturally predict a light dark matter under current constraints including Higgs data, sparticle-mass bounds, dark matter searches, and muon g-2, etc. In this work, we take this scenario of scNMSSM as an example to study the funnel-annihilation mechanisms of light dark matter ($1\!\thicksim\!62$ GeV) and the invisible Higgs decay. In this scenario we found that: (i) There can be four funnel-annihilation mechanisms for the LSP $\tildeχ^0_1$, which are the $h_2$, $Z$, $h_1$ and $a_1$ funnel. (ii) For the $h_1$ and $a_1$ funnel with right relic density, the $\tildeχ^0_1$ mass is lighter than 12 GeV, and the invisible Higgs decay can be $2\%$ at most. (iii) For the $h_2$ and $Z$ funnel with right relic density, the invisible Higgs decay can be about $0.4\%$ and $1\%$ respectively at most. (iv) If the invisible Higgs decay was discovered at the HL-LHC, the four funnel-annihilation mechanisms of light dark matter may be all excluded with $\tildeχ^0_1$ as the only dark matter source. Four benchmark points, one for each mechanism, are proposed for future checking with updated experimental results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Higgs decay to light scalars in the semi-constrained NMSSM

The next-to minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM) with non-universal Higgs masses, or the semi-constrained NMSSM (scNMSSM), extend the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) by a singlet superfield and assume universal conditions except for the Higgs sector. It can not only keep the simpleness and grace of the fully constrained MSSM and NMSSM, and relax the tension that they face after the 125-GeV Higgs boson discovered, but also predict an exotic phenomenon that Higgs decay to a pair of light singlet-dominated scalars ($10\!\sim\! 60\;{\rm GeV}$). This condition can be classified to three scenarios according to the identities of the SM-like Higgs and the light scalar: (i) the light scalar is CP-odd, and the SM-like Higgs is $h_2$; (ii) the light scalar is CP-odd, and the SM-like Higgs is $h_1$; (iii) the light scalar is CP-even, and the SM-like Higgs is $h_2$. In this work, we compare the three scenarios, checking the interesting parameter schemes that lead to the scenarios, the mixing levels of the doublets and singlets, the tri-scalar coupling between the SM-like Higgs and a pair of light scalars, the branching ratio of Higgs decay to the light scalars, and sensitivities in hunting for the exotic decay at the HL-LHC and the future lepton colliders such as CEPC, FCC-ee, and ILC.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Light Higgsino-dominated NLSPs in the Semi-constrained NMSSM

In the semi-constrained NMSSM (scNMSSM, or NMSSM with non-universal Higgs mass) under current constraints, we consider a scenario where $h_2$ is the SM-like Higgs, $\tildeχ^0_1$ is singlino-dominated LSP, $\tildeχ^{\pm}_1$ and $\tildeχ^0_{2,3}$ are mass-degenerated, light and higgsino-dominated NLSPs (next-to-lightest supersymmetric particles). We investigate the constraints to these NLSPs from searching for SUSY particles at the LHC Run-I and Run-II, discuss the possibility of discovering these NLSPs in the future, and come to the following conclusions: (i) With all data of Run I and up to 36 $\rm fb^{-1}$ data of Run II at the LHC, the search results by ATLAS and CMS can still not exclude the higgsino-dominated NLSPs of $100\sim200$ GeV. (ii) When the mass difference with $\tildeχ^0_{1}$ is smaller than $m_{h_2}$, $\tildeχ^0_{2}$ and $\tildeχ^0_{3}$ have opposite preference on decaying to $Z/Z^*$ or $h_1$. (iii) When the mass difference between NLSP and LSP is larger than $m_Z$, most of the samples can be checked at $5σ$ level with future 300 $\rm fb^{-1}$ data at the LHC. While with 3000 $\rm fb^{-1}$ data at the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), nearly all of the samples can be checked at $5σ$ level even if the mass difference is insufficient. (iv) The $a_1$ funnel and the $h_2/Z$ funnel mechanisms for the singlino-dominated LSP annihilating can not be distinguished by searching for NLSPs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Little Higgs theory confronted with the LHC Higgs data

We confront the little Higgs theory with the LHC Higgs search data (up to 17 fb$^{-1}$ of the combined 7 and 8 TeV run). Considering some typical models, namely the littlest Higgs model (LH), the littlest Higgs model with T-parity (LHT-A and LHT-B) and the simplest little Higgs model (SLH), we scan over the parameter space in the region allowed by current experiments. We find that in these models the inclusive and exclusive (via gluon-gluon fusion) diphoton and $ZZ^*$ signal rates of the Higgs boson are always suppressed and approach to the SM predictions for a large scale $f$. Thus, the $ZZ^*$ signal rate is within the $1σ$ range of the experimental data while the inclusive diphoton signal rate is always outside the $2σ$ range. Especially, in the LHT-A the diphoton signal rate is outside the $3σ$ range of the experimental data for $f < 800$ GeV. We also perform a global $χ^2$ fit to the available LHC and Tevatron Higgs data, and find that these models provide no better global fit to the whole data set (only for some special channels a better fit can be obtained, specially in the LHT-B).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access