Researcher profile

Jing Shuang Li

Jing Shuang Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Internal feedback in the cortical perception-action loop enables fast and accurate behavior

Animals move smoothly and reliably in unpredictable environments. Models of sensorimotor control have assumed that sensory information from the environment leads to actions, which then act back on the environment, creating a single, unidirectional perception-action loop. This loop contains internal delays in sensory and motor pathways, which can lead to unstable control. We show here that these delays can be compensated by internal feedback signals that flow backwards, from motor towards sensory areas. Internal feedback is ubiquitous in neural sensorimotor systems and recent advances in control theory show how internal feedback compensates internal delays. This is accomplished by filtering out self-generated and other predictable changes in early sensory areas so that unpredicted, actionable information can be rapidly transmitted toward action by the fastest components. For example, fast, giant neurons are necessarily less accurate than smaller neurons, but they are crucial for fast and accurate behavior. We use a mathematically tractable control model to show that internal feedback has an indispensable role in achieving state estimation, localization of function -- how different parts of cortex control different parts of the body -- and attention, all of which are crucial for effective sensorimotor control. This control model can explain anatomical, physiological and behavioral observations, including motor signals in visual cortex, heterogeneous kinetics of sensory receptors and the presence of giant Betz cells in motor cortex, Meynert cells in visual cortex and giant von Economo cells in the prefrontal cortex of humans as well as internal feedback patterns and unexplained heterogeneity in other neural systems.

preprint2022arXiv

Distributed and Localized Model Predictive Control. Part I: Synthesis and Implementation

The increasing presence of large-scale distributed systems highlights the need for scalable control strategies where only local communication is required. Moreover, in safety-critical systems it is imperative that such control strategies handle constraints in the presence of disturbances. In response to this need, we present the Distributed and Localized Model Predictive Control (DLMPC) algorithm for large-scale linear systems. DLMPC is a distributed closed-loop model predictive control (MPC) scheme wherein only local state and model information needs to be exchanged between subsystems for the computation and implementation of control actions. We use the System Level Synthesis (SLS) framework to reformulate the centralized MPC problem, and show that this allows us to naturally impose localized communication constraints between sub-controllers. The structure of the resulting problem can be exploited to develop an Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) based algorithm that allows for distributed and localized computation of closed-loop control policies. We demonstrate that computational complexity of the subproblems solved by each subsystem in DLMPC is independent of the size of the global system. To the best of our knowledge, DLMPC is the first MPC algorithm that allows for the scalable distributed computation as well as implementation of distributed closed-loop control policies, and seemingly deals with additive disturbances. In our companion paper, we show that this approach enjoys recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability.

preprint2022arXiv

Distributed and Localized Model Predictive Control. Part II: Theoretical Guarantees

Engineered cyberphysical systems are growing increasingly large and complex. These systems require scalable controllers that robustly satisfy state and input constraints in the presence of additive noise -- such controllers should also be accompanied by theoretical guarantees on feasibility and stability. In our companion paper, we introduced Distributed and Localized Model Predictive Control (DLMPC) for large-scale linear systems; DLMPC is a scalable closed-loop MPC scheme in which subsystems need only exchange local information in order to synthesize and implement local controllers. In this paper, we provide recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability guarantees for DLMPC. We leverage the System Level Synthesis framework to express the maximal positive robust invariant set for the closed-loop system and its corresponding Lyapunov function, both in terms of the closed-loop system responses. We use the invariant set as the terminal set for DLMPC, and show that this guarantees feasibility with minimal conservatism. We use the Lyapunov function as the terminal cost, and show that this guarantees stability. We provide fully distributed and localized algorithms to compute the terminal set offline, and also provide necessary additions to the online DLMPC algorithm to accommodate coupled terminal constraint and cost. In all algorithms, only local information exchanges are necessary, and computational complexity is independent of the global system size -- we demonstrate this analytically and experimentally. This is the first distributed MPC approach that provides minimally conservative yet fully distributed guarantees for recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability, for both nominal and robust settings.

preprint2022arXiv

Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Diversity, Delays, and Standard Theory

Neural architectures in organisms support efficient and robust control that is beyond the capability of engineered architectures. Unraveling the function of such architectures is challenging; their components are highly diverse and heterogeneous in their morphology, physiology, and biochemistry, and often obey severe speed-accuracy tradeoffs; they also contain many cryptic internal feedback pathways (IFPs). We claim that IFPs are crucial architectural features that strategically combine highly diverse components to give rise to optimal performance. We demonstrate this in a case study, and additionally describe how sensing and actuation delays in standard control (state feedback, full control, output feedback) give rise to independent and separable sources of IFPs. Our case study is an LQR problem with two types of sensors, one fast but sparse and one dense but slow. Controllers using only one type of sensor perform poorly, often failing even to stabilize; controllers using both types of sensors perform extremely well, demonstrating a strong diversity-enabled sweet spot (DESS). We demonstrate that IFPs are key in enabling this DESS, and additionally that with IFPs removed, controllers with delayed sensing perform poorly. The existence of strong DESS and IFP in this simple example suggest that these are fundamental architectural features in any complex system with diverse components, such as organisms and cyberphysical systems.

preprint2022arXiv

Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Locality and System Level Synthesis

The presence of internal feedback pathways (IFPs) is a prevalent yet unexplained phenomenon in the brain. Motivated by experimental observations on 1) motor-related signals in visual areas, and 2) massively distributed processing in the brain, we approach this problem from a sensorimotor standpoint and make use of distributed optimal controllers to explain IFPs. We use the System Level Synthesis (SLS) controller to model neural phenomena such as signaling delay, local processing, and local reaction. Based on the SLS controller, we make qualitative predictions about IFPs that strongly align with existing experimental observations. We introduce a `mesocircuit' for optimal performance with distributed and local processing, and local disturbance rejection; this mesocircuit requires extreme amounts of IFPs and memory for proper function. This is the first theory that replicates the massive amounts of IFPs in the brain purely from a priori principles, providing a new theoretical basis upon which we can build to better understand the inner workings of the brain.

preprint2020arXiv

Separating Controller Design from Closed-Loop Design: A New Perspective on System-Level Controller Synthesis

We show that given a desired closed-loop response for a system, there exists an affine subspace of controllers that achieve this response. By leveraging the existence of this subspace, we are able to separate controller design from closed-loop design by first synthesizing the desired closed-loop response and then synthesizing a controller that achieves the desired response. This is a useful extension to the recently introduced System Level Synthesis framework, in which the controller and closed-loop response are jointly synthesized and we cannot enforce controller-specific constraints without subjecting the closed-loop map to the same constraints. We demonstrate the importance of separating controller design from closed-loop design with an example in which communication delay and locality constraints cause standard SLS to be infeasible. Using our new two-step procedure, we are able to synthesize a controller that obeys the constraints while only incurring a 3% increase in LQR cost compared to the optimal LQR controller.