Researcher profile

Anish A. Sarma

Anish A. Sarma contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Internal feedback in the cortical perception-action loop enables fast and accurate behavior

Animals move smoothly and reliably in unpredictable environments. Models of sensorimotor control have assumed that sensory information from the environment leads to actions, which then act back on the environment, creating a single, unidirectional perception-action loop. This loop contains internal delays in sensory and motor pathways, which can lead to unstable control. We show here that these delays can be compensated by internal feedback signals that flow backwards, from motor towards sensory areas. Internal feedback is ubiquitous in neural sensorimotor systems and recent advances in control theory show how internal feedback compensates internal delays. This is accomplished by filtering out self-generated and other predictable changes in early sensory areas so that unpredicted, actionable information can be rapidly transmitted toward action by the fastest components. For example, fast, giant neurons are necessarily less accurate than smaller neurons, but they are crucial for fast and accurate behavior. We use a mathematically tractable control model to show that internal feedback has an indispensable role in achieving state estimation, localization of function -- how different parts of cortex control different parts of the body -- and attention, all of which are crucial for effective sensorimotor control. This control model can explain anatomical, physiological and behavioral observations, including motor signals in visual cortex, heterogeneous kinetics of sensory receptors and the presence of giant Betz cells in motor cortex, Meynert cells in visual cortex and giant von Economo cells in the prefrontal cortex of humans as well as internal feedback patterns and unexplained heterogeneity in other neural systems.

preprint2022arXiv

Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Diversity, Delays, and Standard Theory

Neural architectures in organisms support efficient and robust control that is beyond the capability of engineered architectures. Unraveling the function of such architectures is challenging; their components are highly diverse and heterogeneous in their morphology, physiology, and biochemistry, and often obey severe speed-accuracy tradeoffs; they also contain many cryptic internal feedback pathways (IFPs). We claim that IFPs are crucial architectural features that strategically combine highly diverse components to give rise to optimal performance. We demonstrate this in a case study, and additionally describe how sensing and actuation delays in standard control (state feedback, full control, output feedback) give rise to independent and separable sources of IFPs. Our case study is an LQR problem with two types of sensors, one fast but sparse and one dense but slow. Controllers using only one type of sensor perform poorly, often failing even to stabilize; controllers using both types of sensors perform extremely well, demonstrating a strong diversity-enabled sweet spot (DESS). We demonstrate that IFPs are key in enabling this DESS, and additionally that with IFPs removed, controllers with delayed sensing perform poorly. The existence of strong DESS and IFP in this simple example suggest that these are fundamental architectural features in any complex system with diverse components, such as organisms and cyberphysical systems.

preprint2020arXiv

Robust Performance Guarantees for System Level Synthesis

We generalize the system level synthesis framework to systems defined by bounded causal linear operators, and use this parameterization to make connections between robust system level synthesis and classical results from the robust control literature. In particular, by leveraging results from L1 robust control, we show that necessary and sufficient conditions for robust performance with respect to causal bounded linear uncertainty in the system dynamics can be translated into convex constraints on the system responses. We exploit this connection to show that these conditions naturally allow for the incorporation of delay, sparsity, and locality constraints on the system responses and resulting controller implementation, allowing these methods to be applied to large-scale distributed control problems -- to the best of our knowledge, these are the first such robust performance guarantees for distributed control systems.