BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jin Lei

Jin Lei contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
nucl-thnucl-ex

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

The Hussein-McVoy formula for inclusive breakup revisited. A Tribute to Mahir Hussein

In 1985, Hussein and McVoy [Nuc. Phys. A445 (1985) 124] elucidated a formula for the evaluation of the nonelastic breakup ("stripping") contribution in inclusive breakup reactions. The formula, based on the spectator core model, acquires a particularly simple and appealing form in the eikonal limit, to the extent that it has become the standard procedure to analyze single-nucleon knockout reactions at intermediate energies. In this contribution, a critical assessment of this formula is presented and its connection with other, noneikonal expressions discussed. Some calculations comparing the different formulae are also presented for the one-nucleon removal of $^{14}$O+$^{9}$Be reaction at several incident energies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Comparison of semiclassical transfer to continuum model with Ichimura-Austern-Vincent model in medium energy knockout reactions

The full quantum mechanical (QM) model of inclusive breakup of Ichimura-Austern-Vincent (IAV) is implemented in this paper to calculate breakup from heavy radioactive nuclei on a $^9$Be target at intermediate energies. So far it had been implemented and applied only to low energy reactions with light projectiles. The IAV model is successful in predicting absolute cross sections among other observables. In order to get insight on the content of the model in the case of the complicated heavy-ion reactions, results are compared with those of the semiclassical transfer to the continuum (TC) model. Because the TC is based on analytical formulae the dynamics of the breakup as it is contained in the rather involved IAV formalism will become more transparent. Heavy-ion reactions at high energies ($>$50A.MeV) are demanding from the computational point of view because of the high number of partial waves involved, typically around 100. The TC constitutes a useful alternative to the full QM calculations whenever predictions and/or estimates are necessary. It allows also for a systematic, fast evaluation of breakup observables. In the applications of both methods we use state-of-the art optical potentials and structure information. Excellent agreement is found between the calculated results of both methods and with available experimental data which shows that the qualitative and quantitative understanding of most aspects of one nucleon breakup is well under control.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Lagrange-mesh R-matrix method for inhomogenous equations

The Lagrange-mesh $R$-matrix method is generalized to inhomogeneous equations. This method is numerically stable and efficient. It can be directly used for transfer reactions with the formalism discussed by Ascuitto and Glendenning [Phys. Rev. 181,1396 (1969)] and for inclusive breakup reactions modeled by Ichimura, Austern, and Vincent [Phys. Rev. C 32, 431 (1985)]. We first present a simple example to assess the method. Then the application to the $^{93}$Nb($d$,$pX$) non-elastic breakup is discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Reaction Theory and Advanced CDCC

The Continuum-Discretized Coupled-Channels (CDCC) has been successfully employed to describe elastic and breakup of nuclear reactions induced by weakly bound projectiles. In this contribution, we review some other, less widespread applications of the CDCC wavefunction, some of them in combination with other reaction formalisms, which are being currently employed in the analysis of reactions involving three or more fragments in the initial or final state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Unraveling the reaction mechanisms leading to partial fusion of weakly bound nuclei

Collisions between complex nuclei may give rise to their total or partial fusion. The latter case is found experimentally to gain importance when one of the colliding nuclei is weakly bound. It has been commonly assumed that the partial fusion mechanism is a two-step process, whose first step is the dissociation of the weakly bound nucleus, followed by the capture of one of the fragments. To assess this interpretation, we present the first implementation of the three-body model of inclusive breakup proposed in the 1980s by Austern et al. [Phys. Rep. 154, 125 (1987)] that accounts for both the direct, one-step, partial fusion and the two-step mechanism proceeding via the projectile continuum states. Contrary to the widely assumed picture, we find that, at least for the investigated cases, the partial fusion is largely dominated by the direct capture from the projectile ground-state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access