Source author record

Jennifer Hill

Jennifer Hill appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Applications math.ST Methodology Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

A Causal Framework for Observational Studies of Discrimination

In studies of discrimination, researchers often seek to estimate a causal effect of race or gender on outcomes. For example, in the criminal justice context, one might ask whether arrested individuals would have been subsequently charged or convicted had they been a different race. It has long been known that such counterfactual questions face measurement challenges related to omitted-variable bias, and conceptual challenges related to the definition of causal estimands for largely immutable characteristics. Another concern, which has been the subject of recent debates, is post-treatment bias: many studies of discrimination condition on apparently intermediate outcomes, like being arrested, that themselves may be the product of discrimination, potentially corrupting statistical estimates. There is, however, reason to be optimistic. By carefully defining the estimand -- and by considering the precise timing of events -- we show that a primary causal quantity of interest in discrimination studies can be estimated under an ignorability condition that may hold approximately in some observational settings. We illustrate these ideas by analyzing both simulated data and the charging decisions of a prosecutor's office in a large county in the United States.

preprint2022arXiv

The Impact of Attending a Remedial Support Program on Syrian Children's Reading Skills: Using BART for Causal Inference

This article estimates, for a sample of 1,777 Syrian refugee children, the impact on basic reading assessments of attending a remedial support program in Lebanon that was infused with social and emotional learning practices. We use flexible methods that capitalize on advantages of both machine learning and Bayesian inferential frameworks to leverage the information available in understudied contexts and help account for the problem of self-selection. Average treatment effects were estimated both using multiply imputed data and data from outcome-respondents only. We do not find conclusive evidence for an effect on one of the reading measures studied (ASER). However, we provide evidence for positive effects for three, more robust, measures of basic reading outcomes from the Arabic EGRA assessment. We discuss potential reasons for the differences in effects that are relevant for educational research and practice. We also consider the implications for future research of choices related to measurement, data collection and processing, and missing data.

preprint2013arXiv

Assessing lack of common support in causal inference using Bayesian nonparametrics: Implications for evaluating the effect of breastfeeding on children's cognitive outcomes

Causal inference in observational studies typically requires making comparisons between groups that are dissimilar. For instance, researchers investigating the role of a prolonged duration of breastfeeding on child outcomes may be forced to make comparisons between women with substantially different characteristics on average. In the extreme there may exist neighborhoods of the covariate space where there are not sufficient numbers of both groups of women (those who breastfed for prolonged periods and those who did not) to make inferences about those women. This is referred to as lack of common support. Problems can arise when we try to estimate causal effects for units that lack common support, thus we may want to avoid inference for such units. If ignorability is satisfied with respect to a set of potential confounders, then identifying whether, or for which units, the common support assumption holds is an empirical question. However, in the high-dimensional covariate space often required to satisfy ignorability such identification may not be trivial. Existing methods used to address this problem often require reliance on parametric assumptions and most, if not all, ignore the information embedded in the response variable. We distinguish between the concepts of "common support" and common causal support." We propose a new approach for identifying common causal support that addresses some of the shortcomings of existing methods. We motivate and illustrate the approach using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to estimate the effect of breastfeeding at least nine months on reading and math achievement scores at age five or six. We also evaluate the comparative performance of this method in hypothetical examples and simulations where the true treatment effect is known.

preprint2012arXiv

On the Stationary Distribution of Iterative Imputations

Iterative imputation, in which variables are imputed one at a time each given a model predicting from all the others, is a popular technique that can be convenient and flexible, as it replaces a potentially difficult multivariate modeling problem with relatively simple univariate regressions. In this paper, we begin to characterize the stationary distributions of iterative imputations and their statistical properties. More precisely, when the conditional models are compatible (defined in the text), we give a set of sufficient conditions under which the imputation distribution converges in total variation to the posterior distribution of a Bayesian model. When the conditional models are incompatible but are valid, we show that the combined imputation estimator is consistent.