BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jelle J. Goeman

Jelle J. Goeman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologymath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Cluster extent inference revisited: quantification and localization of brain activity

Cluster inference based on spatial extent thresholding is the most popular analysis method for finding activated brain areas in neuroimaging. However, the method has several well-known issues. While powerful for finding brain regions with some activation, the method as currently defined does not allow any further quantification or localization of signal. In this paper we repair this gap. We show that cluster-extent inference can be used (1.) to infer the presence of signal in anatomical regions of interest and (2.) to quantify the percentage of active voxels in any cluster or region of interest. These additional inferences come for free, i.e. they do not require any further adjustment of the alpha-level of tests, while retaining full familywise error control. We achieve this extension of the possibilities of cluster inference by an embedding of the method into a closed testing procedure, and solving the graph-theoretic k-separator problem that results from this embedding. The new method can be used in combination with random field theory or permutations. We demonstrate the usefulness of the method in a large-scale application to neuroimaging data from the Neurovault database.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Resampling-Based Multisplit Inference for High-Dimensional Regression

We propose a novel resampling-based method to construct an asymptotically exact test for any subset of hypotheses on coefficients in high-dimensional linear regression. It can be embedded into any multiple testing procedure to make confidence statements on relevant predictor variables. The method constructs permutation test statistics for any individual hypothesis by means of repeated splits of the data and a variable selection technique; then it defines a test for any subset by suitably aggregating its variables' test statistics. The resulting procedure is extremely flexible, as it allows different selection techniques and several combining functions. We present it in two ways: an exact method and an approximate one, that requires less memory usage and shorter computation time, and can be scaled up to higher dimensions. We illustrate the performance of the method with simulations and the analysis of real gene expression data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Permutation-based simultaneous confidence bounds for the false discovery proportion

When multiple hypotheses are tested, interest is often in ensuring that the proportion of false discoveries (FDP) is small with high confidence. In this paper, confidence upper bounds for the FDP are constructed, which are simultaneous over all rejection cut-offs. In particular this allows the user to select a set of hypotheses post hoc such that the FDP lies below some constant with high confidence. Our method uses permutations to account for the dependence structure in the data. So far only Meinshausen provided an exact, permutation-based and computationally feasible method for simultaneous FDP bounds. We provide an exact method, which uniformly improves this procedure. Further, we provide a generalization of this method. It lets the user select the shape of the simultaneous confidence bounds. This gives the user more freedom in determining the power properties of the method. Interestingly, several existing permutation methods, such as Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) and Westfall and Young's maxT method, are obtained as special cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Better-Than-Chance Classification for Signal Detection

The estimated accuracy of a classifier is a random quantity with variability. A common practice in supervised machine learning, is thus to test if the estimated accuracy is significantly better than chance level. This method of signal detection is particularly popular in neuroimaging and genetics. We provide evidence that using a classifier's accuracy as a test statistic can be an underpowered strategy for finding differences between populations, compared to a bona-fide statistical test. It is also computationally more demanding than a statistical test. Via simulation, we compare test statistics that are based on classification accuracy, to others based on multivariate test statistics. We find that probability of detecting differences between two distributions is lower for accuracy based statistics. We examine several candidate causes for the low power of accuracy tests. These causes include: the discrete nature of the accuracy test statistic, the type of signal accuracy tests are designed to detect, their inefficient use of the data, and their regularization. When the purposes of the analysis is not signal detection, but rather, the evaluation of a particular classifier, we suggest several improvements to increase power. In particular, to replace V-fold cross validation with the Leave-One-Out Bootstrap.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research

Motivated by the practice of exploratory research, we formulate an approach to multiple testing that reverses the conventional roles of the user and the multiple testing procedure. Traditionally, the user chooses the error criterion, and the procedure the resulting rejected set. Instead, we propose to let the user choose the rejected set freely, and to let the multiple testing procedure return a confidence statement on the number of false rejections incurred. In our approach, such confidence statements are simultaneous for all choices of the rejected set, so that post hoc selection of the rejected set does not compromise their validity. The proposed reversal of roles requires nothing more than a review of the familiar closed testing procedure, but with a focus on the non-consonant rejections that this procedure makes. We suggest several shortcuts to avoid the computational problems associated with closed testing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control

Closed testing and partitioning are recognized as fundamental principles of familywise error control. In this paper, we argue that sequential rejection can be considered equally fundamental as a general principle of multiple testing. We present a general sequentially rejective multiple testing procedure and show that many well-known familywise error controlling methods can be constructed as special cases of this procedure, among which are the procedures of Holm, Shaffer and Hochberg, parallel and serial gatekeeping procedures, modern procedures for multiple testing in graphs, resampling-based multiple testing procedures and even the closed testing and partitioning procedures themselves. We also give a general proof that sequentially rejective multiple testing procedures strongly control the familywise error if they fulfill simple criteria of monotonicity of the critical values and a limited form of weak familywise error control in each single step. The sequential rejection principle gives a novel theoretical perspective on many well-known multiple testing procedures, emphasizing the sequential aspect. Its main practical usefulness is for the development of multiple testing procedures for null hypotheses, possibly logically related, that are structured in a graph. We illustrate this by presenting a uniform improvement of a recently published procedure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access