BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jeffrey D. Ullman

Jeffrey D. Ullman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
DatabasesDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingComputational ComplexityCryptography and SecurityData Structures and AlgorithmsInformation Retrieval

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Panda: Partitioned Data Security on Outsourced Sensitive and Non-sensitive Data

Despite extensive research on cryptography, secure and efficient query processing over outsourced data remains an open challenge. This paper continues along with the emerging trend in secure data processing that recognizes that the entire dataset may not be sensitive, and hence, non-sensitivity of data can be exploited to overcome limitations of existing encryption-based approaches. We, first, provide a new security definition, entitled partitioned data security for guaranteeing that the joint processing of non-sensitive data (in cleartext) and sensitive data (in encrypted form) does not lead to any leakage. Then, this paper proposes a new secure approach, entitled query binning (QB) that allows secure execution of queries over non-sensitive and sensitive parts of the data. QB maps a query to a set of queries over the sensitive and non-sensitive data in a way that no leakage will occur due to the joint processing over sensitive and non-sensitive data. In particular, we propose secure algorithms for selection, range, and join queries to be executed over encrypted sensitive and cleartext non-sensitive datasets. Interestingly, in addition to improving performance, we show that QB actually strengthens the security of the underlying cryptographic technique by preventing size, frequency-count, and workload-skew attacks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Assignment Problems of Different-Sized Inputs in MapReduce

A MapReduce algorithm can be described by a mapping schema, which assigns inputs to a set of reducers, such that for each required output there exists a reducer that receives all the inputs that participate in the computation of this output. Reducers have a capacity, which limits the sets of inputs that they can be assigned. However, individual inputs may vary in terms of size. We consider, for the first time, mapping schemas where input sizes are part of the considerations and restrictions. One of the significant parameters to optimize in any MapReduce job is communication cost between the map and reduce phases. The communication cost can be optimized by minimizing the number of copies of inputs sent to the reducers. The communication cost is closely related to the number of reducers of constrained capacity that are used to accommodate appropriately the inputs, so that the requirement of how the inputs must meet in a reducer is satisfied. In this work, we consider a family of problems where it is required that each input meets with each other input in at least one reducer. We also consider a slightly different family of problems in which, each input of a list, X, is required to meet each input of another list, Y, in at least one reducer. We prove that finding an optimal mapping schema for these families of problems is NP-hard, and present a bin-packing-based approximation algorithm for finding a near optimal mapping schema.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Efficient and Private Approximations of Distributed Databases Calculations

In recent years, an increasing amount of data is collected in different and often, not cooperative, databases. The problem of privacy-preserving, distributed calculations over separated databases and, a relative to it, issue of private data release were intensively investigated. However, despite a considerable progress, computational complexity, due to an increasing size of data, remains a limiting factor in real-world deployments, especially in case of privacy-preserving computations. In this paper, we present a general method for trade off between performance and accuracy of distributed calculations by performing data sampling. Sampling was a topic of extensive research that recently received a boost of interest. We provide a sampling method targeted at separate, non-collaborating, vertically partitioned datasets. The method is exemplified and tested on approximation of intersection set both without and with privacy-preserving mechanism. An analysis of the bound on error as a function of the sample size is discussed and heuristic algorithm is suggested to further improve the performance. The algorithms were implemented and experimental results confirm the validity of the approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Meta-MapReduce: A Technique for Reducing Communication in MapReduce Computations

MapReduce has proven to be one of the most useful paradigms in the revolution of distributed computing, where cloud services and cluster computing become the standard venue for computing. The federation of cloud and big data activities is the next challenge where MapReduce should be modified to avoid (big) data migration across remote (cloud) sites. This is exactly our scope of research, where only the very essential data for obtaining the result is transmitted, reducing communication, processing and preserving data privacy as much as possible. In this work, we propose an algorithmic technique for MapReduce algorithms, called Meta-MapReduce, that decreases the communication cost by allowing us to process and move metadata to clouds and from the map phase to reduce phase. In Meta-MapReduce, the reduce phase fetches only the required data at required iterations, which in turn, assists in preserving the data privacy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Some Pairs Problems

A common form of MapReduce application involves discovering relationships between certain pairs of inputs. Similarity joins serve as a good example of this type of problem, which we call a "some-pairs" problem. In the framework of Afrati et al. (VLDB 2013), algorithms are measured by the tradeoff between reducer size (maximum number of inputs a reducer can handle) and the replication rate (average number of reducers to which an input must be sent. There are two obvious approaches to solving some-pairs problems in general. We show that no general-purpose MapReduce algorithm can beat both of these two algorithms in the worst case. We then explore a recursive algorithm for solving some-pairs problems and heuristics for beating the lower bound on common instances of the some-pairs class of problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Assignment of Different-Sized Inputs in MapReduce

A MapReduce algorithm can be described by a mapping schema, which assigns inputs to a set of reducers, such that for each required output there exists a reducer that receives all the inputs that participate in the computation of this output. Reducers have a capacity, which limits the sets of inputs that they can be assigned. However, individual inputs may vary in terms of size. We consider, for the first time, mapping schemas where input sizes are part of the considerations and restrictions. One of the significant parameters to optimize in any MapReduce job is communication cost between the map and reduce phases. The communication cost can be optimized by minimizing the number of copies of inputs sent to the reducers. The communication cost is closely related to the number of reducers of constrained capacity that are used to accommodate appropriately the inputs, so that the requirement of how the inputs must meet in a reducer is satisfied. In this work, we consider a family of problems where it is required that each input meets with each other input in at least one reducer. We also consider a slightly different family of problems in which, each input of a set, X, is required to meet each input of another set, Y, in at least one reducer. We prove that finding an optimal mapping schema for these families of problem is NP-hard, and present several approximation algorithms for finding a near optimal mapping schema.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Computing Marginals Using MapReduce

We consider the problem of computing the data-cube marginals of a fixed order $k$ (i.e., all marginals that aggregate over $k$ dimensions), using a single round of MapReduce. The focus is on the relationship between the reducer size (number of inputs allowed at a single reducer) and the replication rate (number of reducers to which an input is sent). We show that the replication rate is minimized when the reducers receive all the inputs necessary to compute one marginal of higher order. That observation lets us view the problem as one of covering sets of $k$ dimensions with sets of a larger size $m$, a problem that has been studied under the name "covering numbers." We offer a number of constructions that, for different values of $k$ and $m$ meet or come close to yielding the minimum possible replication rate for a given reducer size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Handling Skew in Multiway Joins in Parallel Processing

Handling skew is one of the major challenges in query processing. In distributed computational environments such as MapReduce, uneven distribution of the data to the servers is not desired. One of the dominant measures that we want to optimize in distributed environments is communication cost. In a MapReduce job this is the amount of data that is transferred from the mappers to the reducers. In this paper we will introduce a novel technique for handling skew when we want to compute a multiway join in one MapReduce round with minimum communication cost. This technique is actually an adaptation of the Shares algorithm [Afrati et. al, TKDE 2011].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

SharesSkew: An Algorithm to Handle Skew for Joins in MapReduce

In this paper, we investigate the problem of computing a multiway join in one round of MapReduce when the data may be skewed. We optimize on communication cost, i.e., the amount of data that is transferred from the mappers to the reducers. We identify join attributes values that appear very frequently, Heavy Hitters (HH). We distribute HH valued records to reducers avoiding skew by using an adaptation of the Shares~\cite{AfUl} algorithm to achieve minimum communication cost. Our algorithm is implemented for experimentation and is offered as open source software. Furthermore, we investigate a class of multiway joins for which a simpler variant of the algorithm can handle skew. We offer closed forms for computing the parameters of the algorithm for chain and symmetric joins.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Enumerating Subgraph Instances Using Map-Reduce

The theme of this paper is how to find all instances of a given "sample" graph in a larger "data graph," using a single round of map-reduce. For the simplest sample graph, the triangle, we improve upon the best known such algorithm. We then examine the general case, considering both the communication cost between mappers and reducers and the total computation cost at the reducers. To minimize communication cost, we exploit the techniques of (Afrati and Ullman, TKDE 2011)for computing multiway joins (evaluating conjunctive queries) in a single map-reduce round. Several methods are shown for translating sample graphs into a union of conjunctive queries with as few queries as possible. We also address the matter of optimizing computation cost. Many serial algorithms are shown to be "convertible," in the sense that it is possible to partition the data graph, explore each partition in a separate reducer, and have the total computation cost at the reducers be of the same order as the computation cost of the serial algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Upper and Lower Bounds on the Cost of a Map-Reduce Computation

In this paper we study the tradeoff between parallelism and communication cost in a map-reduce computation. For any problem that is not "embarrassingly parallel," the finer we partition the work of the reducers so that more parallelism can be extracted, the greater will be the total communication between mappers and reducers. We introduce a model of problems that can be solved in a single round of map-reduce computation. This model enables a generic recipe for discovering lower bounds on communication cost as a function of the maximum number of inputs that can be assigned to one reducer. We use the model to analyze the tradeoff for three problems: finding pairs of strings at Hamming distance $d$, finding triangles and other patterns in a larger graph, and matrix multiplication. For finding strings of Hamming distance 1, we have upper and lower bounds that match exactly. For triangles and many other graphs, we have upper and lower bounds that are the same to within a constant factor. For the problem of matrix multiplication, we have matching upper and lower bounds for one-round map-reduce algorithms. We are also able to explore two-round map-reduce algorithms for matrix multiplication and show that these never have more communication, for a given reducer size, than the best one-round algorithm, and often have significantly less.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Vision Paper: Towards an Understanding of the Limits of Map-Reduce Computation

A significant amount of recent research work has addressed the problem of solving various data management problems in the cloud. The major algorithmic challenges in map-reduce computations involve balancing a multitude of factors such as the number of machines available for mappers/reducers, their memory requirements, and communication cost (total amount of data sent from mappers to reducers). Most past work provides custom solutions to specific problems, e.g., performing fuzzy joins in map-reduce, clustering, graph analyses, and so on. While some problems are amenable to very efficient map-reduce algorithms, some other problems do not lend themselves to a natural distribution, and have provable lower bounds. Clearly, the ease of "map-reducability" is closely related to whether the problem can be partitioned into independent pieces, which are distributed across mappers/reducers. What makes a problem distributable? Can we characterize general properties of problems that determine how easy or hard it is to find efficient map-reduce algorithms? This is a vision paper that attempts to answer the questions described above.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access