Researcher profile

Jeff Shrager

Jeff Shrager contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Machine Learning Applications Artificial Intelligence cs.CY Human-Computer Interaction Information Retrieval math.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline

4works

0followers

7topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Weight Set Decomposition for Weighted Rank Aggregation: An interpretable and visual decision support tool

The problem of interpreting or aggregating multiple rankings is common to many real-world applications. Perhaps the simplest and most common approach is a weighted rank aggregation, wherein a (convex) weight is applied to each input ranking and then ordered. This paper describes a new tool for visualizing and displaying ranking information for the weighted rank aggregation method. Traditionally, the aim of rank aggregation is to summarize the information from the input rankings and provide one final ranking that hopefully represents a more accurate or truthful result than any one input ranking. While such an aggregated ranking is, and clearly has been, useful to many applications, it also obscures information. In this paper, we show the wealth of information that is available for the weighted rank aggregation problem due to its structure. We apply weight set decomposition to the set of convex multipliers, study the properties useful for understanding this decomposition, and visualize the indifference regions. This methodology reveals information--that is otherwise collapsed by the aggregated ranking--into a useful, interpretable, and intuitive decision support tool. Included are multiple illustrative examples, along with heuristic and exact algorithms for computing the weight set decomposition.

preprint2015arXiv

Demandance

A demandance is a psychological "pull" exerted by a stimulus. It is closely related to the theory of "affordance". I introduce the theory of demandance, offer some motivating examples, briefly explore its psychological basis, and examine some implications of the theory. I exemplify some of the positive and negative implications of demandances for design, with special attention to young children and the design of educational products and practices. I suggest that demandance offers an approach to one of the persistent mysteries of the theory of affordance, specifically: Given that there may be many affordances in any particular setting, how do we choose which to actually act upon?

preprint2015arXiv

On the Privacy Practices of Just Plain Sites

In addition to visiting high profile sites such as Facebook and Google, web users often visit more modest sites, such as those operated by bloggers, or by local organizations such as schools. Such sites, which we call "Just Plain Sites" (JPSs) are likely to inadvertently represent greater privacy risks than high profile sites by virtue of being unable to afford privacy expertise. To assess the prevalence of the privacy risks to which JPSs may inadvertently be exposing their visitors, we analyzed a number of easily observed privacy practices of such sites. We found that many JPSs collect a great deal of information from their visitors, share a great deal of information about their visitors with third parties, permit a great deal of tracking of their visitors, and use deprecated or unsafe security practices. Our goal in this work is not to scold JPS operators, but to raise awareness of these facts among both JPS operators and visitors, possibly encouraging the operators of such sites to take greater care in their implementations, and visitors to take greater care in how, when, and what they share.

preprint2013arXiv

Theoretical Issues for Global Cumulative Treatment Analysis (GCTA)

Adaptive trials are now mainstream science. Recently, researchers have taken the adaptive trial concept to its natural conclusion, proposing what we call "Global Cumulative Treatment Analysis" (GCTA). Similar to the adaptive trial, decision making and data collection and analysis in the GCTA are continuous and integrated, and treatments are ranked in accord with the statistics of this information, combined with what offers the most information gain. Where GCTA differs from an adaptive trial, or, for that matter, from any trial design, is that all patients are implicitly participants in the GCTA process, regardless of whether they are formally enrolled in a trial. This paper discusses some of the theoretical and practical issues that arise in the design of a GCTA, along with some preliminary thoughts on how they might be approached.