Source author record

Jean Liénard

Jean Liénard appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Unmasking information manipulation: A quantitative approach to detecting Copy-pasta, Rewording, and Translation on Social Media

This study proposes a comprehensive methodology for identifying three techniques utilized in foreign-operated information manipulation campaigns: Copy-Pasta, Rewording, and Translation. Our approach, dubbed the ``$3Δ$-space duplicate methodology'', quantifies the semantic, grapheme, and language aspects of messages. Computing pairwise distances within these dimensions enables detection of abnormally close messages that are likely part of a coordinated campaign. We validate our approach using a synthetic dataset generated with ChatGPT and DeepL, further applying it to a real-world dataset on Venezuelan actors from Twitter Transparency. Our method successfully identifies all three types of inauthentic duplicates in the synthetic dataset, and is able to uncover inauthentic duplicates across political, commercial, and entertainment contexts in the Twitter dataset. The distinct focus on clustered alterations to messages, rather than individual messages, makes our approach efficient and effective at detecting large-scale instances of textual manipulation, including AI-generated ones. Moreover, our method offers a robust tool for identifying translated content, overlooked in previous research. This research also represents the first comprehensive analysis of copy-pasta detection, providing a reliable technique for tracking duplicate textual content across social networks.

preprint2022arXiv

Impact of gender on the formation and outcome of mentoring relationships in academic research

Despite increasing representation in graduate training programs, a disproportionate number of women leave academic research before obtaining an independent position. To understand factors underlying this trend, we analyzed a multidisciplinary database of Ph.D. and postdoctoral mentoring relationships covering the years 2000-2020, focusing on data from the life sciences. Student and mentor gender are both associated with differences in rates of student's continuation to independent mentor positions of their own. Although trainees of women mentors are less likely to take on independent positions than trainees of men mentors, this effect is reduced substantially after controlling for several measurements of mentor status. Thus the effect of mentor gender can be explained at least partially by gender disparities in social and financial resources available to mentors. Because trainees and mentors tend to be of the same gender, this association between mentor gender and academic continuation disproportionately impacts women trainees. On average, gender homophily in graduate training is unrelated to mentor status. A notable exception to this trend is the special case of scientists having been granted an outstanding distinction, evidenced by membership in the National Academy of Sciences, being a grantee of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, or having been awarded the Nobel Prize. This group of mentors trains men graduate students at higher rates than their most successful colleagues. These results suggest that, in addition to other factors that limit career choices for women trainees, gender inequities in mentors' access to resources and prestige contribute to women's attrition from independent research positions.

preprint2015arXiv

A biologically constrained model of the whole basal ganglia addressing the paradoxes of connections and selection

The basal ganglia nuclei form a complex network of nuclei often assumed to perform selection, yet their individual roles and how they influence each other is still largely unclear. In particular, the ties between the external and internal parts of the globus pallidus are paradoxical, as anatomical data suggest a potent inhibitory projection between them while electrophys-iological recordings indicate that they have similar activities. Here we introduce a theoretical study that reconciles both views on the intra-pallidal projection, by providing a plausible characterization of the relationship between the external and internal globus pallidus. Specifically, we developed a mean-field model of the whole basal ganglia, whose parameterization is optimized to respect best a collection of numerous anatomical and electrophysiological data. We first obtained models respecting all our constraints, hence anatomical and electrophysiological data on the intrapallidal projection are globally consistent. This model furthermore predicts that both aforementioned views about the intra-pallidal projection may be reconciled when this projection is weakly inhibitory, thus making it possible to support similar neural activity in both nuclei and for the entire basal ganglia to select between actions. Second, we predicts that afferent projections are substantially unbalanced towards the external segment, as it receives the strongest excitation from STN and the weakest inhibition from the striatum. Finally, our study strongly suggest that the intrapallidal connection pattern is not focused but diffuse, as this latter pattern is more efficient for the overall selection performed in the basal ganglia.

preprint2015arXiv

Multi-objective analysis of computational models

Computational models are of increasing complexity and their behavior may in particular emerge from the interaction of different parts. Studying such models becomes then more and more difficult and there is a need for methods and tools supporting this process. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms generate a set of trade-off solutions instead of a single optimal solution. The availability of a set of solutions that have the specificity to be optimal relative to carefully chosen objectives allows to perform data mining in order to better understand model features and regularities. We review the corresponding work, propose a unifying framework, and highlight its potential use. Typical questions that such a methodology allows to address are the following: what are the most critical parameters of the model? What are the relations between the parameters and the objectives? What are the typical behaviors of the model? Two examples are provided to illustrate the capabilities of the methodology. The features of a flapping-wing robot are thus evaluated to find out its speed-energy relation, together with the criticality of its parameters. A neurocomputational model of the Basal Ganglia brain nuclei is then considered and its most salient features according to this methodology are presented and discussed.